You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Count Timothy von Icarus

Comments

That certainly describes part of the "far-right". And it would be fair to say that POMO is often used selectively. Arguments against the institutions ...
February 17, 2024 at 13:16
If you are defining superveniance with B-minimal properties or P Regions this is not the case. Any change in P, the (relevant) brush strokes (or their...
February 17, 2024 at 12:46
I slogged my way though a lot of Kant asking this question. So I found it amusing to find out that there are a significant number of Kantians who say ...
February 17, 2024 at 01:34
Ok, so since Hitler never murdered anyone, and wasn't even in the room when anyone was murdered, he cannot be a criminal. All he did was speak words. ...
February 16, 2024 at 22:03
A bitterly ironic area to consider considering that most POMO thinkers tended to be far to the left side of the political spectrum. For decades they s...
February 16, 2024 at 18:40
I'm not sure what he is referring to but if collapse/decoherence is real (not a limit in possible observation, but an ontic change) then the Schroding...
February 16, 2024 at 17:13
An example might be helpful. Consider the experience of seeing an apple. It seems plausible that physical constituents of the apple could vary dramati...
February 16, 2024 at 16:31
Ha, not to go back on my OP, but I am now thinking that B-Minimal Properties do not rule out multiple realizability in an important sense. If we consi...
February 16, 2024 at 14:32
Certainly. Yes, but I don't think it's exactly the same. We can, in a roundabout, absential way, observe these processes. If you look at how people de...
February 16, 2024 at 14:05
That's a fair point. I suppose it's also worth considering that while B-Minimal properties remove the possibility of multiple realizability, perhaps t...
February 16, 2024 at 13:58
I edited to clarify. In general, we want to use superveniance to explain in some way how the mental is in some way dependant on the physical, whereas ...
February 16, 2024 at 13:39
For Hoffman, the core mistake would be the presupposition that experiences must necessarily be of objects "out there," which in turn leads to the conc...
February 16, 2024 at 11:38
This, or maybe a Bohm-de Broglie guy, retrocausal, or one of the new "super determinism" types (who I've never quite wrapped my mind around)? The prob...
February 16, 2024 at 11:16
It's not this, my comment was just about the context in which math is consistent within assumed axioms. Saying "if these are the rules of the game, th...
February 16, 2024 at 10:23
Actually, having written that, I wonder if it might be more accurate to say that mathematics is one of the origin points of the POMO perspective and t...
February 16, 2024 at 02:35
By no means. It's just that a lot of people into POMO are very open and vocal about wanting their work to achieve some sort of positive "social change...
February 16, 2024 at 02:22
There is already a lot of pluralism and "questioning all assumptions," in the foundations of mathematics/philosophy of mathematics, so it's hard to se...
February 16, 2024 at 01:35
No, I'm aware of that. I think there are good issues to raise there. For example, Donald Hoffman does a good job bringing these issues to the fore in ...
February 15, 2024 at 20:05
I haven't read Brewer's paper so I cannot speak to it. If that's how the phrase is intended, then it seems like a silly position to advance, and I wou...
February 15, 2024 at 19:36
I have not expressed a "doctrine." I have expressed what follows from your claim that "words cannot cause people to act." This is not an either/or dis...
February 15, 2024 at 19:28
I would agree that this would be a very difficult problem if this is what is being implied in the bolded text, but I don't see how that is the case. I...
February 15, 2024 at 19:06
No, we are dealing with an infinite regress in cases where we have to posit an infinite number of past causes for something. E.g., X began because of ...
February 15, 2024 at 17:43
Right, but my point is that multiple entities experiences don't need to be identical or even particularly similar to share a direct relationship with ...
February 15, 2024 at 17:20
If you look at the part of my post above under the heading "Supervenience Relations," perhaps that might be helpful in elucidating such a "bridge." It...
February 15, 2024 at 16:57
I don't disagree with anything you wrote. However, contemporary versions of direct realism, intentionality theories, and phenomenological theories all...
February 15, 2024 at 15:14
But how do they know what they are being employed to do without words and laws? How do they know what their job entails? It can't be because they read...
February 15, 2024 at 13:17
If you don't want to call is causal it still seems like you'd need to explain the counterfactual. How does B fail to occur without A, and when A occur...
February 15, 2024 at 12:52
It can't involve both? It seems prima facie unreasonable to me to assume that someone who responds to the question "what is the capital of Florida," w...
February 15, 2024 at 03:39
So the genesis — begining — of the process that ends up with the bank teller giving the robber the money begins with the teller, not the robber? This ...
February 15, 2024 at 03:20
If I ask someone "what is the capital of Florida?" and they respond "Tallahassee," would they have uttered the word Tallahassee if I hadn't asked the ...
February 15, 2024 at 01:25
The definition is sort of besides the point, I was just trying to express what I intended to you. Although for future reference you might consider rev...
February 14, 2024 at 21:09
Yes, I am aware of how ways in which Popper specifies the term "falsification" vis-a-vis scientific theories (although in The Logic of Scientific Disc...
February 14, 2024 at 20:34
And only scientific claims can be falsified? The claim "the Goldbach Conjecture is false," wouldn't be falsified by a successful mathematical proof de...
February 14, 2024 at 20:08
But then all the semantic meaning of the word bachelor isn't derived from (Male(x) & Adult(x) & ~Married(x)). If it were, you wouldn't need multiple u...
February 14, 2024 at 19:49
Do they? It seems to me like intentionality theory was developed precisely because indirect realism makes naturalists uncomfortable. That is, it's a m...
February 14, 2024 at 19:44
So, a bachelor's degree is equivalent to an "unmarried man's degree?" But then how do married men and women have bachelor's degrees? It seems like the...
February 14, 2024 at 19:32
We have had a great many threads on this topic. In general, I think your line of reasoning works. However, proponents of uncaused existence generally ...
February 14, 2024 at 19:03
If agent's actions were actually determined by "nothing outside the agent," then it should be the case that agent's actions have no relation to the wo...
February 14, 2024 at 18:44
Is the "elimination of the impossible," or discovery of "ways the world necessarily could not have been or cannot be described," not, broadly speaking...
February 14, 2024 at 18:13
The statement that reality does not exist simpliciter, or that there can be no canonical representation of reality as it exists simpliciter, advances ...
February 14, 2024 at 16:09
I am confused by this interchange. Is your claim that words cannot play a causal role in people's actions or that this would amount to magic? The asse...
February 14, 2024 at 15:02
It doesn't seem unquestioning at all. I was referring back to your statement that: "only within a taken-for-granted , unquestioned set of normative pr...
February 13, 2024 at 20:45
I don't want to sound like a broken record, but my reading on emergence has caused me to question if the concept might be fundamentally broken. It tak...
February 13, 2024 at 15:55
It doesn't always suppose multiple different acts. I've seen it framed as a single act preforming multiple "functions." Other schemes are more categor...
February 13, 2024 at 01:06
Gotcha. If imagine = visualize, it makes sense. Although I think it might make it sort of trivial in that it would seem to hold for the essential elem...
February 12, 2024 at 23:26
Is this true though? I feel like I have a pretty easy time imagining abstract objects without having to attribute extension to them. I don't know if I...
February 12, 2024 at 22:23
Right, and this is validation of what? Validation that something is or is not the case. Or in more fallibilist terms, that something appears or does n...
February 12, 2024 at 19:53
You seem to be missing my point, which is that experiences of truth and falsity are (initially) prephilosophical. Every human has some conception of t...
February 11, 2024 at 13:42
It's just a comment on methodology in the field writ large. I was thinking this makes it, in certain respects, quite different from apophatic theology...
February 10, 2024 at 13:50
I mean that all makes sense, although my understanding was that the question of whether or not space-time is infinitely divisible was an open one. I k...
February 10, 2024 at 13:38