You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Skiessa

['Member']Joined: June 23, 2017 at 17:01Last active: July 21, 2017 at 17:09None discussions5 comments

Comments

In: Questions - something and nothing  — view comment
the block universe. very fascinating idea, and i think that the wave function of particles may actually suggest it to be true. we know that the partic...
June 25, 2017 at 22:08
In: Questions - something and nothing  — view comment
gravity waves are a good notice. i'm not too familiar with the concept but they seem to be kind of direct observation of the space-time. maybe some wh...
June 25, 2017 at 17:43
In: Questions - something and nothing  — view comment
if you define the 'nothing' as something that exists it must be something rather than nothing, because it at least has the property of existence. and ...
June 24, 2017 at 17:50
In: Questions - something and nothing  — view comment
"no matter, no energy" no space, no time, no laws of physics, no nothing. Yet it is still something if you define it existent.
June 23, 2017 at 21:38
In: Questions - something and nothing  — view comment
In my opinion either you define the 'nothing' as a pre-existing state to the universe which means its something existent (leading to guestion of why d...
June 23, 2017 at 18:22
⇧