Procreation is intrinsically NOT a personal matter. Firstly you need two people to do it and a third or even more persons are created who have no say ...
My leg not yours! You will give your kids the gift of disease and decay for your needs without the possibility of consent. That's what my thought expe...
Absolutely you're kind of getting it. I don't think we need to worry then about creating people no one gets hurt because of our needs if we choose not...
Only for people who exist to be deprived of goods. No it wouldn't lol. There'd be no one there to be haunted! Please tell me you can recognise that? I...
They're not tho. We've no duty to create them. If the universe went silent there'd be no issue. Only to existing people. Only for those who exist in s...
Camus was wrong <shrugs> Religious Buddhists believe something as unverifiable and irrationally optimistic as Christians. But they're not necessary. A...
She was an ardent Christian. Died at 47. Hard to know how authentic he was. No because no one is deprived of the happiness. No one suffers. No one los...
We're trying to walk two paths here. 1) the asymmetry we could talk about that. 2) you talking about my perceptions of my life. 1) is fine to talk abo...
I agree with the asymmetry don't get me wrong. I think it's correct. Benatar just formalized something I already thought. If you could be terribly wro...
"There is no empirical evidence that most people don't value their lives or that there aren't good moments that we did not expect." Well cool, because...
What progress do you speak of? A lot of the progress I see is in the ability to support more and more sentient beings. But I'm not sure if that's just...
This argument strikes me as at best indentured servitude to a hypothetical or slavery to a hypothetical at worst. Am I off the mark? "You must exist a...
"Firstly, most people do seem to value their lives" One can value one's life and because of that come to the conclusion of antinatalism. "I value my l...
Comments