Not language games, just that translating the math is hard because quantum physics isn't exactly intuitive. Yes they do, otherwise you end up with peo...
Knowing what's going to happen is a requirement, that's how we make decisions. We do what we think is best based on reasons. No we're not, because the...
It’s just facts. Most of the nonsense I heard around this is just misunderstanding the science. That’s actually a good reason to not partake in it and...
Ummm...yes. The reasons for suicide aren't temporary, we just say that because of hindsight. At that moment you don't know what's gonna happen. Think ...
I don't really care because half of what they have to say isn't worth listening to. Or none of that. The whole "world beyond our senses" is just noise...
Science is consensus, that’s how it works. It makes perfect sense which is right or wrong because one explains the data and the other doesn’t. The pro...
Well no, philosophy isn’t required and just kicks up the data since philosophers don’t understand what’s going on. Stuff like this just reinforces my ...
Not even a reply because it's speaking massively of privilege and doesn't grasp the whole scope of life. Outside of modern society life is pretty brut...
The anti-realism is based on a misunderstanding of quantum physics, it still hinges on the notion that consciousness is involved when it's not. The pa...
You are keeping you alive when you eat and all that stuff. I already covered that at the start, you’re just not paying attention. No it’s not incohere...
That’s not a problem with it. The workings are pretty much standard for something with no design or intelligence. Tell me you don’t understand the the...
They’re not, you’re just not able to engage with them. It’s easier to just dismiss such things rather than wonder why we even bother with them. It’s t...
Sounds more like you don’t have an actual case to make. I already addressed this with my “so what” at the beginning. Not an argument. Like I’ve mentio...
Irrelevant, for reasons I already mentioned. There is no real need to be concerned over what happens to others if one is dead. All that stuff vanishes...
They aren't really philosophical categories, they're pretty well defined TBH. Except it is. Yes we do, yes we do, and we have some solid ideas. Not re...
I guess some indication that my replies and posts are being read and engaged with. The whole "love" thing I covered at the start and yet it just feels...
It's pretty much done every day, you don't really need philosophy to do that. The fact it pans out and leads to discoveries that we can manipulate and...
You didn't even read the original post I made which addresses why your argument fails. Never mind that I've done that before and it doesn't lead to me...
https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?cluster=16295625758829094935&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_vis=1#d=gs_qabs&t=1734279682125&u=%23p%3DF6i2K0qxJeIJ Yeah I cou...
Well it’s not much of a problem per se because this only applies to very small stuff, not our day to day. The interpretations are just a way to explai...
that was a bad answer, definitely not 100. The same applies to your so called love. At the end it’s still about you and feeling better for yourself it...
They aren't answers thought. Love isn't a reason it's just platitudinous nonsense, same with making meaning. I gave the case at the start why such rea...
I'm not reading all that, summarize into English. I don't understand why people assume everyone understands this on the level that they do. Do any of ...
It's not, that is EXACTLY what he means by the participatory universe and it's pretty much regarded as false. Also consciousness doesn't cause collaps...
From what I see it can’t, especially in this case where the interpretations of quantum physics aren’t even close to the math that is taking place. The...
Sorta, I think the Copenhagen is saying that nothing exists unless you look at it, but that’s not true. The particles still exist, just that some thin...
Even still you have to posit an external reality with peer review otherwise there isn’t really a point to science. Even the crazier interpretations do...
Well the issue with that is we are working with interpretations of extremely high level math, so our wondering is really more like butchering the evid...
Ummm, not really? I've seen a few of them and the only thing they have in common is how they don't understand the science. Most physicists I've talked...
that was my initial response to what they said, however after further thought I have no reason to take the person in the Quora answer seriously. No am...
Except that we do. Also good work showing how useless this sort of thinking is in day to day. Looking back at the guy in the answer he's obviously wro...
Considering all you're doing is parroting one thing it's likely you. Like I said it does deceive in certain instances, like water and mirages, and not...
Again, it depends on the context, science is more gray than most think. Especially in biology. Like I said you don't understand it as well as you thin...
That’s just not true. Refraction can sometimes be a trick like with water. That is also well understood in physics. I’m thinking you don’t get this as...
There is no stance, it's really just the brain. That fact is more or less solved at the moment and I am well aware of refraction hence it's not the br...
I mean it's been 5 pages and you haven't really gone anywhere with this. You kinda have to accept other minds otherwise there isn't a reason to take a...
No it is behaving wrongly because it appears bent when it isn't. It has nothing to do with the intuitive interpretation of the light, hence why it's a...
Comments