You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

apokrisis

Comments

That is rather the point. Peirce was highlighting the presumption you have “truthfully” identified an object. Some concrete particular under the first...
July 28, 2020 at 21:06
:up:
July 28, 2020 at 20:44
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_wave#/media/File:ComplexSinInATimeAxe.gif
July 28, 2020 at 20:22
The PNC is not about "truth". It is about "validity". Or indeed, merely about "computability". So let's take the deflationary tack here. The PNC could...
July 28, 2020 at 03:31
It only contradicts some assumptions you take as axiomatic to your theism. The PNC is a case in point. A belief in some Newtonian and non-thermal mode...
July 28, 2020 at 01:42
U(1) is just the simplest possible symmetry group. It is the symmetry of a rotating circle. And nothing is more symmetric than a circular object. If y...
July 28, 2020 at 01:06
Yes, we can consider this a contest between pragmatic naturalism and dogmatic theism if you like. One holds consequences here in the real world. The o...
July 27, 2020 at 20:34
But Euclidean geometry was merely shown to be a special limit case on non-Euclidean geometry. The two were consistent. The advance was to find a param...
July 27, 2020 at 01:57
If time is what is emergent, then it is necessary that nothing be happening before it gets started. The idea of "before" becomes the incoherent claim ...
July 27, 2020 at 01:07
This is a good example of the tensions now developing because mathematical research looks to be cutting deeper than empirical research. We simply can'...
July 26, 2020 at 23:37
I certainly find that any good metaphysics has a mathematical clarity. So there is a deep connection. But not a simple one. In general, good metaphysi...
July 26, 2020 at 23:22
I agree with that argument too. Which is why I say the matter of origination can only be solved by adding a logic of vagueness to our metaphysical too...
July 26, 2020 at 20:31
Yep. Guess so,
July 26, 2020 at 09:44
Where was your question? Were you wanting a definition of force as a term of art in modern physics as opposed to the many other ways of using the same...
July 26, 2020 at 09:12
Are you high?
July 26, 2020 at 08:39
Hmm. Is this philosophy as practiced by academia or the kind of “philosophy” that believes in crystals and scented candles? Seriously. Show me the phi...
July 26, 2020 at 06:28
The social definition of inertia; demonstrated here as “meaning is use”. :lol:
July 26, 2020 at 05:12
Next demonstrate your comprehension of today’s set word by using it successfully in a whole sentence. Tomorrow, we can try using it in a paragraph. In...
July 26, 2020 at 03:33
Do you have a source where it is clear that is the argument? The Stanford article I cited on the prime matter issue fits with my view that Aristotle n...
July 26, 2020 at 03:30
Lol. Why are you trying so hard to avoid talking about inertia? What is that when it is at home in your naive realism paradise?
July 26, 2020 at 02:34
That seems more like a huge difference. :grin: Do you see how one contradicts the other? We have tapped into quantum tunnelling/entanglement in a big ...
July 26, 2020 at 02:25
Err no. Mass is not a simple matter of a weighing a kilo of stuff when you get beyond schoolboy physics. It is defined in terms of inertia - resistanc...
July 26, 2020 at 02:19
“What a thing means is simply what habits it involves.” CP 5.400) :up:
July 26, 2020 at 02:06
First, reductionist is a technical term. Second, you are well recognised as the name caller and scoffer in chief around these parts. :hearts:
July 25, 2020 at 22:38
How many times do we have to scratch the same itch. :smile: The process of “definition” is circular. For a reductionist like Banno, that is a bad thin...
July 25, 2020 at 22:28
I’m unclear as to what you mean. But tunneling and entanglement don’t seem relevant even if axons were understood as copper wires with a flow of elect...
July 25, 2020 at 22:06
Surely what he wanted to refute was an efficient first cause to the Cosmos. And this led him to claim that the actuality of Being must therefore be et...
July 25, 2020 at 02:40
Conversation? I asked you a question that you can’t/won’t answer. I supplied the reference to how modern physics would quantify substance. Play or go ...
July 25, 2020 at 00:23
You had your chance to reply. And...
July 25, 2020 at 00:14
I wouldn't. Banno did. What else did you think I was picking out here?....
July 25, 2020 at 00:00
You mean that I just exposed your own disingenuous game here. Yes, you can buzz off now.
July 24, 2020 at 23:21
It's what you said. And it seems legit. :grin:
July 24, 2020 at 23:11
I mean it could be that you are just trolling, or lazy, or something else. But I don't mind if you believe it is this.
July 24, 2020 at 23:07
But we agree why that is so.
July 24, 2020 at 22:59
We agree then. :ok:
July 24, 2020 at 22:50
I realise you are not interested in the real answer here. But physics has arrived at its most general way of measuring units of substantial being - ht...
July 24, 2020 at 22:40
The usual lumpen riposte. How heavy is your 1kg mass in outer space? What are your units of measurement now? Are you going to rely on a pair of scales...
July 24, 2020 at 22:30
Great. I’m just pointing out how it contradicts your broad generalisation in the OP. You now need to modify your statement to claim only a community o...
July 24, 2020 at 20:22
Sure. That is why I used that example. As a great big question-mark counter to the OP's generalisation.... If Isis collectively agreed that its course...
July 24, 2020 at 05:15
Always looking for the loopholes that might lie in what we don't know? :razz: In fact we do know plenty about glia. And you keep talking about electri...
July 24, 2020 at 04:50
Thanks for digging out the bit you had in mind. We have of course been through this hoop before. Not that I mind a re-run. :razz: As this Stanford art...
July 24, 2020 at 02:23
I have. Although it’s been a while. Which quote or paragraph did you mean?
July 24, 2020 at 01:33
I think you are in essence right. The problem is how do you then define flourishing? Isis flourished in some sense as a community bound by shared prec...
July 24, 2020 at 01:31
Which passage did you have in mind where he labelled it a fiction?
July 24, 2020 at 01:15
Sorry, I misread your "primary substance" as "prime matter". But then I'm still not sure which you have in mind here. However I would see Primary Subs...
July 24, 2020 at 00:19
So "mass" has been properly identified and defined? Or did you mean "massiveness"? Oh dear. Back into the good old metaphysical debate about "substanc...
July 23, 2020 at 23:44
Trans means "beyond" and so that would be a claim of dualism. Pan is a claim of monism. My own approach is semiotic and so triadic - about a relation ...
July 23, 2020 at 23:38
So the cryptochrome example would go to my point. The nanoscale is where quantum effects can be harnessed by molecular machinery. The claim is that is...
July 23, 2020 at 21:37
Surely what Aristotle meant by prime matter is one of the most fraught debates in metaphysics. But it can’t be cashed out as mental stuff. Nor even, i...
July 23, 2020 at 02:48
It has to be the case that the matter~antimatter symmetry couldn’t actually cancel away, and so some latent asymmetry exists. This has been confirmed ...
July 23, 2020 at 02:32