You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

apokrisis

Comments

The real world problem is that the AI bubble is debt driven hype that has already become too big to fail. Its development has to be recklessly pursued...
October 12, 2025 at 00:14
Indeed. And if laws are constraints, then the regularities can be statistical. Exceptions get to prove the general rule. You arrive at the Peircean vi...
October 11, 2025 at 23:57
I prefer Bergson to Whitehead, although you are right about the triadic structure of relations and how all this fits the thermo-picture of the growing...
October 11, 2025 at 22:47
To be honest, I hated it. Absolutely not my taste. But I am very picky about my music. The rap works - and harder would be better - as the bombast of ...
October 11, 2025 at 09:35
For fun’s, I just gave Gemini a whirl. I don’t think there is much to worry about quite yet if this is how it performs. I asked it to make your point ...
October 11, 2025 at 08:29
Growing block has the advantage that we have the stable foundation of our past and the open challenge that is our future - to the degree we haven’t al...
October 11, 2025 at 01:57
This is the reality. The tool is now ubiquitous. Every intellectual is going to have to factor it into their practice. Time to learn what that means. ...
October 11, 2025 at 01:50
I’m definitely seeing posters who are suddenly injecting chunks of more organised and considered material into their responses. There are AI tools to ...
October 11, 2025 at 01:41
And AI agrees. :razz:
October 11, 2025 at 00:30
There are many many versions of this in world culture as it is simply what is obvious once you think about how anything could come to have existence. ...
October 10, 2025 at 19:32
Correct. I had a shudder at the mention of Tooley and Sosa’s Causation. Made me think how lucky I was to have an instinctive aversion to reductionism ...
October 10, 2025 at 01:07
It would be guilty of the dualism of Cartesian representationalism if it were not instead the enactive story of a self in interaction with its world. ...
October 10, 2025 at 00:45
I think the problem is that if you train in philosophy and then specialise in logic, you can't help but become a metaphysical-strength reductionist. T...
October 09, 2025 at 23:00
Yep. The growing block universe is a way to see both sides of the story. The fact that the future is free, and so can evolve in unpredicted ways. And ...
October 09, 2025 at 22:27
Precisely. It is not a theory of consciousness but a meta-theory of self-organisation. And one large enough to encompass the meta-theories of self-org...
October 09, 2025 at 21:28
:lol: :lol: :lol:
October 09, 2025 at 20:27
Sure. But I am drawing attention to the tricky fact that Nature is organised by both “complicity” and “simplexity” as Stewart and Cohen waggishly put ...
October 09, 2025 at 20:21
AI gives a nice summary…. You might note that your own AI prompt ends up referencing a lot of my own PF posts. :lol:
October 09, 2025 at 20:09
Sure. The molecule must be a message. But it is also a molecule. And there must be a message. The issue is not semantics becoming physics. It is seman...
October 09, 2025 at 20:01
So you accept the principle of feedforward in general, just not in Friston’s particular case? And yet Friston is generalising the feedforward story as...
October 09, 2025 at 09:37
Fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, and other maths of complexity do a good job of modelling physical processes over all scales. A vortice is a vortice fr...
October 09, 2025 at 05:05
But this is just a basic principle of cognitive science. There is already abundant evidence for it. The mind is a predictive model. Some of the most d...
October 09, 2025 at 02:27
I like the Britney version for being more like how the words would echo in their own confusion. Serious, but not taken seriously. :cool:
October 09, 2025 at 01:42
Reading your post again, it does sound like you are stressing that my view would be based on immanence rather than transcendence in terms of any "firs...
October 08, 2025 at 23:43
I’m not sure what you mean there. But the fact that fundamental physics is rooted in the maths of symmetry is rather Platonic and hylomorphic. It is a...
October 08, 2025 at 19:56
But that is exactly what gauge symmetry does. It explains why particles are created and annihilated in matter-antimatter pairs. You break a chiral or ...
October 08, 2025 at 18:48
So physics did not organise this new situation and evolution did. Thus your simple complexity thesis has a sudden hole in it. Sure. But this isn’t jus...
October 08, 2025 at 10:02
Probably not. But what is it in terms of a simple continuum of physical complexity that a DNA base carries a semiotic meaning. Try to make that connec...
October 08, 2025 at 08:59
Life and mind depend on the emergence of codes. The information processing possibilities of genes, neurons, words and numbers. So how do codes “just e...
October 08, 2025 at 08:41
Caught red-handed!
October 08, 2025 at 05:37
Aha! AI now writing your posts. That will solve one of your problems. :lol: Now you just need to learn to write honest prompts. Anyways, as AI replies...
October 08, 2025 at 05:26
Brilliant! Hysterical! Not Death Valley Girls, but perhaps valley girls. And the bombastic rap treatment works I’m now seeing Britney Spears in front ...
October 08, 2025 at 04:39
It's pretty shit. :razz: I was thinking more a pastiche of the Death Valley Girls. But only as this immediately sprang to mind. I kind of dread the AI...
October 08, 2025 at 01:54
I already pointed out the issue of priors. Others have noted your failure to cash out semantics in stabilising ontic commitments. It is about the open...
October 08, 2025 at 01:02
Any choice of the music genre? Does AI do psych rock?
October 08, 2025 at 00:45
:up:
October 07, 2025 at 23:50
I think you neatly demonstrate the pitfalls of relying on words when doing serious metaphysics - as in here, trying to say something useful about epis...
October 07, 2025 at 23:48
If you are asking me, then invariance is the globally constraining symmetry of the Cosmos. And so what we mean by talking about Nature’s laws. And the...
October 07, 2025 at 23:29
That’s pretty impressive if you just whipped it up. :grin:
October 07, 2025 at 22:55
But the unity of opposites is preSocratic. And not any old forms but gauge symmetries. Special relativity zeroes the spacetime metric to a set of loca...
October 07, 2025 at 22:21
I hear people talking about it all the time. Just not very meaningfully. And certainly not at all scientifically.
October 07, 2025 at 20:25
And so my reply was precisely about that. The holistic view of a first cause. The unit 1 story of the first symmetry-breaking. The unit 1 story of a u...
October 07, 2025 at 19:43
I thought I was arguing against using a reifying term such as consciousness. I thought I was saying this is where folk already went off track. The cal...
October 07, 2025 at 19:26
So it seems I am both not talking about philosophy yet talking about philosophy in your book? Ought one consider where logic sits in all this at this ...
October 07, 2025 at 19:09
I prefer the past constrains the future. It has already eliminated a huge range of possibilities. That is what makes the future so predictable. But al...
October 07, 2025 at 04:24
Such mock humility. :up:
October 07, 2025 at 04:18
But then these "customs, habits, and shared practices" are what are left vague. Half-baked. Contingencies treated as obligations. So I prefer the Baye...
October 07, 2025 at 01:29
Had anyone mentioned this?… I was pretty dismissive before. But this demonstrates the dangers of the Tech Bros “move fast and break things” approach t...
October 07, 2025 at 00:33
Sure. The problem that remains is do we aim to eliminate every wrong hypothesis or magically leap to the only correct one? This appears to be how you ...
October 07, 2025 at 00:27
Welcome to the 1960s? Anglophone logic choppers wake up to realise something or other might be slightly amiss. They begin shift in their armchairs and...
October 06, 2025 at 22:56