You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

apokrisis

Comments

If your point is that we don't doubt our conceptual frames, we only doubt within the constraints of those frames, then of course I agree. And also, as...
August 24, 2024 at 22:18
So how does that impact my position given that I've already been explicit that I am rejecting Cartesian representationalism – the ontology that permit...
August 23, 2024 at 23:12
Dialectic. Broad as opposed to narrow. Synthetic as opposed to analytic. Meta-theoretic as opposed to applied.
August 23, 2024 at 20:20
But don’t we - even at the meta-epistemic level - ground it all in pragmatism? A chair is real enough to take my weight. Your quote aims at the usual ...
August 23, 2024 at 20:07
Synthesising expertise. It seems you think you are the expert after all. And you have only just heard of Turchin's work. Probably not even read the pa...
August 22, 2024 at 21:58
And that is no different at the level of fundamental physics. Maths gives us the topological simplicity of particle physics as a SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) stru...
August 22, 2024 at 21:52
Of course. He wound things right back to raw phenomenology so as to get going again on a more solid epistemic basis. That is how he could then commit ...
August 22, 2024 at 21:15
Not sure that is how it works. Seems it ought to require being expert across all fields. But they are not different approaches.
August 22, 2024 at 20:19
Hence the “God of the gaps” issue. My position argues from the point of view that even chaos can’t help but self-organise itself into some form or ord...
August 22, 2024 at 20:09
That’s still just epistemology.
August 22, 2024 at 19:19
[ It is hard to reply given you say nothing about your expertise or interests here. But if you want an example of what a mathematical and systems appr...
August 22, 2024 at 19:14
Here is how I explained that in a similar thread using the reality of organising an actual army... Then further... And more generally... Not to mentio...
August 22, 2024 at 01:11
Well here again is your starter from your own source… I will briefly note again why this is silly. Hierarchy theory in the systems science tradition i...
August 22, 2024 at 00:47
Are you too disinterested to try to say what you mean in your own words? Or even cut and paste from your source? I might as well point to the internet...
August 22, 2024 at 00:03
But that was because economics lacked the larger constraint of a historical perspective on social order. It was concerned with the plumbing of markets...
August 21, 2024 at 23:07
The systems view is now moving from thermodynamics and biology to social science and human history. It claims to add mathematical rigour to the conver...
August 21, 2024 at 21:00
But Rouse’s concern here appears epistemological whereas I was talking ontological commitments. Rouse wants to place the scientific image within some ...
August 21, 2024 at 20:50
But I am talking about hierarchy theory as a branch of science and not in that everyday sense.
August 21, 2024 at 20:01
And maybe I am not your classical naturalist. If you take structuralism seriously, matter isn’t really very material when you get down to it. Even Ari...
August 21, 2024 at 10:11
No, I meant that you are delusional in claiming to be well travelled, unlike me. I had lived in four countries and visited another twenty or so by 12....
August 21, 2024 at 09:22
Indulge your illusions if they give you comfort. :up:
August 21, 2024 at 03:07
But the facts forced him to change his mind. A cosmological constant was added to his equation of state. He remained uncomfortable, but so what. The i...
August 21, 2024 at 02:57
But it is perfectly clear how little idea you have about what that is. You are just babbling in the fashion expected of the standard crypto bro digita...
August 21, 2024 at 01:54
You can see I did in fact reply to @"Ludwig V" on this. So I might as well expand on where I suspect you are going wrong. You have this notion of "pow...
August 21, 2024 at 01:44
So when bar owners are paying off or intimidating the local police so as to be able to fleece the rich tourists, suddenly this becomes evidence for yo...
August 21, 2024 at 00:15
No. The Origins of Political Order, Political Order and Political Decay, and the postscript, Identity, are a really great trilogy. No. I am pointing o...
August 20, 2024 at 21:35
If you can’t present this beetle in a box private theory of yours here, then there is nothing to discuss.
August 20, 2024 at 20:36
I’m not clear what you are driving at. But I have no problem if you are saying the negative can’t be proved. I can’t claim evidence against a transcen...
August 20, 2024 at 20:30
You really are a low effort sort of guy. You can't even cut and paste your example, let alone explain it in terms that are relevant as any kind of cou...
August 20, 2024 at 02:54
NZTA’s multimodal approach was to create safe separation to allow everyone pick the transport choice they best preferred. If you can whiz to work on a...
August 20, 2024 at 01:59
For goodness sakes. Read Fukuyama. All three volumes. :grin: He analyses political structure across the world from the year dot. Read Debt as well for...
August 20, 2024 at 01:49
Just amusing but not related to the thread. On the other hand, it did point to the real world issue of why transport planning is in a bind. I’m not cl...
August 20, 2024 at 01:40
Hold up. Biosemioticians like Stan Salthe explicitly recognise a hierarchy of grades of telos that runs from human purpose to biological function to p...
August 20, 2024 at 01:26
So are there countries where you would be sure that you would hate them less? What do their transport habits look like exactly? Remembering that was t...
August 20, 2024 at 01:04
Well I only got started on the first point. How nature is in general always organised into hierarchical or fractal flows. Then would come how hierarch...
August 20, 2024 at 00:57
How does entropy apply naturally to order except as its negation or inverse? Just as is the relation between signal and noise in the information persp...
August 20, 2024 at 00:29
I was mocking Banjo’s abuse of these dichotomies to serve his rhetorical purposes. The need to tease out what is neurobiological about consciousness, ...
August 20, 2024 at 00:15
So not good vs bad hierarchies, just hierarchy in general. Boo, hiss! Hierarchy, dude! It's baaad! If you could give a concrete example, it would help...
August 19, 2024 at 23:38
Well if you are interested in processing signals, that requires you to have a model of noise. This was Shannon's actual job given he worked with a pho...
August 19, 2024 at 23:32
He gave the game away. If you want to talk about the biology of consciousness, he is just going to confuse you by talking about its sociology. That wa...
August 19, 2024 at 22:34
Claims that the dichotomy of private/public is undeniable. Then denies the dichotomy of private/public can be the subject of a claim. Sounds legit. :u...
August 19, 2024 at 22:21
It goes by a great many names. Here is a sample. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-world_network https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat-tailed_distributi...
August 19, 2024 at 21:37
So then your target isn’t really hierarchical order but some notion of social injustice. If we step back to understand hierarchical order as a pure fo...
August 19, 2024 at 20:41
Yep. That’s where it started. With a conceptual similarity. But then an actual physical connection got made. Folk like Szilárd, Brillouin, Landauer an...
August 19, 2024 at 09:56
Yet the holographic principle in fundamental physics says it means something that the same formalism works for information and entropy. At the Planck ...
August 19, 2024 at 05:17
But I gave you that example. You failed to respond to it. And I can understand why. You have no real argument to make in terms of any evidence you can...
August 19, 2024 at 02:49
It is almost as if crime believed in the statistical utility of risk/reward equations. Dignify it how you like. Arbitrage is arbitrage. The issue is t...
August 19, 2024 at 02:40
Again, no point bothering me until you understand hierarchies. I could explain to you of course. But you don't want to be put in the position that wou...
August 19, 2024 at 01:46
Still nothing being said to back up your claims. Just some annoyed mutterings as you depart the scene. :up:
August 19, 2024 at 01:32
Yep. You really don't understand hierarchies in any theoretical sense. Hence the idiot response. I'll just note how you failed to back up your claims ...
August 19, 2024 at 01:17