You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

apokrisis

Comments

More horsefeathers. Science is only inflexible in demanding the constraint of measurable testing. And that allows a more "anything goes" approach when...
September 04, 2017 at 04:43
Who do you have in mind exactly? And how much is this simply just a fact about what the public wants to buy? The best-sellers are probably those that ...
September 04, 2017 at 04:35
But mathematical physics makes simplifying assumptions to allow tractable calculation. Understanding is then demonstrated because the equations make p...
September 04, 2017 at 04:12
A von Neumann machine or programmable computer. That is what made Turing computation practical. But then that throws the spotlight on to transistors a...
September 04, 2017 at 01:10
The answers show that "one technology" is an ambiguous idea. All technology traces itself back to the one critical formal thought of "a machine". That...
September 04, 2017 at 00:16
We know how a hologram can be recorded in a material medium. How is it recorded in an immaterial one? If we are to grant Bergson some subtlety of thou...
September 03, 2017 at 23:25
You are confusing a problem of maths with a problem of reality. Calculations break down when they arrive at a singularity - a point of circular self-r...
September 03, 2017 at 23:09
I was reading his published papers. The Atlantic article is a gloss. In his papers, he at least makes a separation between the ontic agnosticism of hi...
September 03, 2017 at 23:03
The Hard Problem, or explanatory gap, can only exist philosophically to the extent that you believe in the metaphysical constructs of both self and wo...
September 03, 2017 at 22:42
Yeah. Hoffman starts off with his MUI story, and that is reasonable as an analogic account of psychologiocal processes. Then he goes of into weirdness...
September 03, 2017 at 21:39
Was there some actual question there? I couldn't get anything definite. Perhaps you just wish to assert dualism but are unable to muster the appropria...
September 03, 2017 at 06:40
Does the ball still break the glass if no one is around to observe? (I am trying to imagine things as you are describing them.)
September 03, 2017 at 03:16
On the one hand, Hoffman is just making a standard semiotic or modelling argument. We understand the world through a system of sign. But on the other ...
September 03, 2017 at 03:12
Remember that the maths was developed to deal with idealised point objects. So the Zeno-style paradox of jumping to the first next point to get moving...
September 03, 2017 at 01:57
So you don't even believe in it yourself enough to try to defend it?
September 03, 2017 at 01:52
So the answer is no?
September 03, 2017 at 01:40
What is a holographic energy field? Only reference seems to be to crackpottery - http://ambafrance-do.org/spirituality/24334.php
September 03, 2017 at 01:35
Don't you mean that the Heat Death is eternal? That's quite a surprising conclusion if you think about it.
September 02, 2017 at 05:32
So you can subtract away all acceleration to arrive at an inertial frame. But after constraining second derivative motion to get first degree motion, ...
September 02, 2017 at 05:30
You are very flattering. But its just standard cosmology. You can read all about it yourself.
September 02, 2017 at 04:55
But in one, the glass is not bending, nor the ball flattening. In the other, the snapshot looks completely different. The electrostatic bonds holding ...
September 02, 2017 at 04:54
Most people probably can follow simple math. If the Universe had a temperature of 10^32 degrees at the Big Bang, and the Heat Death is defined by it b...
September 02, 2017 at 03:52
So you support your position of there being no preferred frame by stating your preference for a frame?You support the reciprocality principle by denyi...
September 02, 2017 at 03:37
You are like someone plunging off a skyscraper, now being inches from the ground, shouting out I'm not dead yet, you don't know what you're talking ab...
September 02, 2017 at 03:33
Blub, blub, blub....
September 02, 2017 at 03:03
Just measure the cosmic background radiation. Its 2.7 degrees above absolute zero. The average energy density is down to a handful of protons per cubi...
September 02, 2017 at 03:01
Drowning not waving.
September 02, 2017 at 02:56
Sure. I get that you want to get going with real world modelling. That is where correlations between variables start to mess up attempts to model in t...
September 02, 2017 at 02:50
Ho, ho! Trying to slip out from under the rubble of the wreck of your own argument. Reciprocality says there is a "preferred" and absolute connection ...
September 02, 2017 at 02:20
What a revealing remark.
September 02, 2017 at 02:15
No we bloody don't. Dark energy is a fact. The Heat Death is gonna happen. Of course we now have to account for dark energy. And again - in my view - ...
September 02, 2017 at 02:11
I reject parallel worlds and parallel minds because immanence has to be more reasonable than transcendence when it comes to metaphysics. An immanent e...
September 02, 2017 at 02:00
To be fair to Deutsch, he wrote that book back in the 1990s. Many people got carried away and were taking the most literal metaphysical view of the ne...
September 02, 2017 at 01:50
So they have an inverse relationship, and yet are the same? Did 1/x = x/1 when you went to school, getting your mighty fine grades while apparently pa...
September 02, 2017 at 01:16
Franks - https://stevefrank.org/reprints-pdf/09JEBmaxent.pdf I don't get your objection. If you observe a powerlaw statistics, then that is when you s...
September 02, 2017 at 01:08
They are being metaphysically extravagant in a way the mathematics of decoherence doesn't require. To build an actual quantum computer will require a ...
September 02, 2017 at 00:26
Many worlds is used by many to avoid the physical reality of wavefunction collapse or an actual epistemic cut. Or rather, to argue that rather than lo...
September 02, 2017 at 00:04
Modest or radical? The Copenhagen Interpretation is metaphysically radical in paving the ground to acknowledge that there must be an epistemic cut in ...
September 01, 2017 at 23:43
Models simplify. They shed information. A plot of a frequency distribution is a snapshot of the state of affairs that has developed over time. It is n...
September 01, 2017 at 23:12
I like the quantum information approach where the view is that uncertainty is irreducible because you can't ask two orthogonal questions of reality at...
September 01, 2017 at 22:46
It is an assertion of immanence and a rejection of transcendence. The self is the system as a whole. And it is a whole in that all four causes evolve ...
September 01, 2017 at 22:29
You did badly in science class? Is that what causes you to blather on here?
September 01, 2017 at 21:48
Yep, machines need a creator. That is why organisms need explanation in terms of a logic of self organisation.
September 01, 2017 at 21:47
Fruitloop.
September 01, 2017 at 21:00
A powerlaw distribution is a log/log plot. So the result of exponential growth or uninhibited development in two contrasting or dichotomous directions...
September 01, 2017 at 20:56
Bonkers.
September 01, 2017 at 20:35
Not just the nuts. The absolute coconuts.
September 01, 2017 at 13:01
Surely whether you want unbounded growth or a steady state is what would determine whether you decide to engineer for a powerlaw or Gaussian situation...
September 01, 2017 at 12:15
And yet a muon travelling at relativistic speed takes much longer to decay. Fancy that.
September 01, 2017 at 12:03
Receptivity?
September 01, 2017 at 11:40