You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

apokrisis

Comments

If a difference doesn't make a difference, is it really a difference? The Laws of Thought are framed for dealing with actual differences - differences...
November 21, 2017 at 20:36
I defined indirect in saying that we see signs and not facts. I defined indirect as a triadic interpretive process rather than a dyadic observational ...
November 21, 2017 at 01:07
I'm not following your point.
November 20, 2017 at 20:11
It doesn't matter much that Peirce was a believer of some kind any more that it does Newton, Darwin and Einstein were. As to exactly what kind of thei...
November 20, 2017 at 03:17
That seems the likely story. But Porat is still listing it as part of his investment portolio. So all part of some grander clickbait marketing strateg...
November 20, 2017 at 02:56
As I've just posted, I don't find it possible to literally "not think about anything". And neuroscience explains why that would be the case. When we s...
November 19, 2017 at 21:44
Yeah. There is no escape from it. And the question is why would one even want to escape from it? If you do Zen, you will know that you can't actually ...
November 19, 2017 at 21:34
But that is what I am saying. That is what makes knowledge indirect. We don't see the world directly - which would be a simple dyadic relation of self...
November 19, 2017 at 21:09
But the linguistic framing begins when we are infants and becomes an engrained habit. So this is not about what you report to me using words. It is th...
November 19, 2017 at 20:23
Nice one. Truth neither needs a definition nor could one be defined. That will keep post-truth at bay. (I declare ... bullshit! :) )
November 19, 2017 at 06:12
And I want to acknowledge that the Hard Problem has something to it, while also deflating it as much as possible. The way it is usually presented is m...
November 19, 2017 at 04:15
Surely the debate is normally over which it is, not that it is both? Generally I take the distinction to mean that the causes of being are either full...
November 19, 2017 at 02:37
As usual, you missed the fact you also had to mention the "you" that has "the experience". Yep. The cognition does have to come from somewhere. The "y...
November 19, 2017 at 00:45
Yep. You can conceive of no middle ground between absolutism and relativism. And so - forced to make your choice - you side with absolutism. One can c...
November 19, 2017 at 00:41
Well that's true. Except you are talking only of simple anti-symmetry here, not the proper asymmetry of a reciprocal or inverse relation. So higher an...
November 19, 2017 at 00:30
Laughable. Sure, interpretation must be rooted in physical marks. Something must defy physics, defy the usual fundamental process of entropification a...
November 19, 2017 at 00:16
That's what I'm saying. Exactly. I always agree that there is this kind of Hard Problem issue. But then my position is that this boils down to an issu...
November 18, 2017 at 23:56
Well, if its immanent, it ain't transcendent. So we still have a contradiction I hope.
November 18, 2017 at 23:44
It's dichotomisic rather than dualistic. Yes. My point is that what is primal is the process of "separating out" (that being "apokrisis" :) ) We are b...
November 18, 2017 at 23:43
Did I say God? I said consider the evidence from psychological science. Are you only a recent visitor to our planet?
November 18, 2017 at 23:20
You mean judged by someone to be true or false about something. If a statement isn’t subject to an interpretation, it is just some trail of noise or s...
November 18, 2017 at 23:15
But my argument is that the very fact we can start to deconstruct the social construction is telling. We find ourselves having to step outside ourselv...
November 18, 2017 at 22:10
Yep. Thompson was on to what has become the evo-devo point of view. Nature has self organising dissipative structure. So biosemiosis has pansemiosis t...
November 18, 2017 at 22:04
Is this what you really felt or what you’ve talked yourself into feeling as a way to feel better? Honestly now. If you were to explore your most immed...
November 18, 2017 at 21:43
It must be hard for you to talk about differences in pressure or temperature when you don’t even believe in macrostate descriptions. Oh the tainted sa...
November 18, 2017 at 19:43
But are you agreeing there is more to truth than a world of real facts? That was the important point I wanted to make. Yes, there is a reality out the...
November 18, 2017 at 02:27
So this is another thing I've regularly repeated. Biology can internalise that kind of information. That is what the epistemic cut permits. The Cosmos...
November 18, 2017 at 00:48
Uh huh.
November 18, 2017 at 00:12
Right then. The thermodynamic imperative is not pointing towards anything particularly grand. Just a Cosmic heat death. So it represents the constrain...
November 18, 2017 at 00:08
That also happens with great regularity. Right now I really ought to be going and having lunch.
November 17, 2017 at 23:38
Uh huh. I get that you see the world through the eyes of a reductionist ontology. You don't abide with holism or systems thinking. Your loss.
November 17, 2017 at 23:36
Or evolvability evolves?
November 17, 2017 at 23:31
Again? Even I feel I have repeated myself enough. :)
November 17, 2017 at 23:22
It's an important topic. As usual, I would argue that the notion of "objective truth" itself is a non-starter. We can't combat post-truth simply by sa...
November 17, 2017 at 23:20
The mathematical forms were a pretty convincing motivation for positing a concrete realm of abstracta. Philosophy began with the realisation that the ...
November 17, 2017 at 22:17
Metaphysics and phenomenology couldn't be more connected. Epistemology doesn't get going until we accept that we find ourselves already thrust into th...
November 17, 2017 at 22:06
Hmm. I thought you were referring to a realm of meaning, value, wisdom and consciousness rather than a realm of mathematical abstracta. I'd say that P...
November 17, 2017 at 21:42
Sure. The regulation of instability is something I've started to focus on because of the recent discoveries in biophysics. It is actually quite revolu...
November 17, 2017 at 02:07
I asked about this "higher plane of being". You've said a lot but nothing that counts as an explanation. What is it? How is it? What is it? Where is i...
November 17, 2017 at 02:04
History locks them in. When a wavefunction collapses, an event has now happened in some spatiotemporal location with a definite energy. By the same to...
November 17, 2017 at 01:50
But his hylomorphism led towards both a prime mover and prime matter. So there was some ultimate form/purpose (like the global shaping hand of circula...
November 17, 2017 at 00:28
I didn't say it had to be a recognised science. I was arguing that Western philosophy actually does employ "the scientific method of reasoning". This ...
November 17, 2017 at 00:13
I'm not seeing this as a good summary of some Aristotelian position - scholastically revisionist, or otherwise. This smashes together a whole bunch of...
November 16, 2017 at 23:54
If you want to claim that the higher plane of being is an ontological foundation to being, you will need to show how that isn't just a hollow formula ...
November 16, 2017 at 22:55
Yes. We can eliminate theories that are "not even wrong". If some formula of words makes no observable difference, then it is an empty and meaningless...
November 16, 2017 at 22:27
Well which do you want to say it is? My position is that the relating creates the division into knower and known. So I don't in fact claim there to be...
November 16, 2017 at 21:57
So where you are fudging things is talking about "the knowledge" and not "the knower". You concede my point about the relating, but seek to reify "the...
November 16, 2017 at 21:40
That misrepresents me. Quantification is the third step following the abductive formation of a hypothesis and the deductive formation of a general the...
November 16, 2017 at 21:06
I agree about Kant, but... ...seems too strong. I think this is because knowledge and perception are already such loaded words. Knowledge suggests dir...
November 16, 2017 at 20:42