You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

apokrisis

Comments

Here's a book chapter arguing the same thing in a more general philosophical way. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert_Ulanowicz/publication/29...
December 04, 2017 at 01:07
This is an example of our different interests. You presume parameter spaces can be glued together. I'm concerned with the emergent nature of parameter...
December 03, 2017 at 21:41
I’ve been talking about the thermodynamic constraints that shape dissipative systems like ecologies. You have failed to show why I should care about a...
December 03, 2017 at 11:30
This is the bit that puzzles me. It seems that all your arguments want to circle back to this species diversity index. But that is an utter triviality...
December 03, 2017 at 10:20
I see you jiggling with joy on the sidelines. SX and his man-crushes.
December 03, 2017 at 03:23
And yet something still ties all this variety back to some general intuition. The usual response is "disorder". As I have said, at the metaphysical le...
December 03, 2017 at 03:22
Your comfort is definitely my number one priority. I mean "number one priority".
December 03, 2017 at 02:42
What else do you expect if you take the attitude that we are free to construct metrics which are valid in terms of our own particular interests? I agr...
December 03, 2017 at 02:37
You seem terribly concerned by things that don't seem a big issue from the thermodynamic point of view. A lot of your focus seems to be on how to we s...
December 03, 2017 at 00:40
But the OP was about extracting a political analogy from a lifecycle understanding of ecosystems. I simply responded by saying Salthe's infodynamic pe...
December 03, 2017 at 00:14
Its not metaphorical if infodynamics/semiosis is generalisable to the material dissipative structures in general. Again, you might have to actually re...
December 03, 2017 at 00:08
Does that remain the case now that information theory has been tied to the actual world via holographic theory? Boltzmann's k turned out to be physica...
December 02, 2017 at 22:15
I'm baffled that you say Shannon entropy came before Boltzmann's entropy. But anyway, again my interest is to generalise across the different contextu...
December 02, 2017 at 22:05
What's wrong with a reciprocal relation? If Shannon entropy is the degree of surprise to be found in some system, then the Boltzmann entropy is the de...
December 02, 2017 at 21:47
Up to you. It's a nice day outside. I doubt I will tick off every point you raised.
December 02, 2017 at 21:37
In mechanics, degrees of freedom are a count of the number of independent parameters needed to define the configuration of a system. So your understan...
December 02, 2017 at 21:22
Yeah. But just have a go. Let's see what you could come up with. It truly might help to make sense of your attacks on mine. If instead you really want...
December 01, 2017 at 02:35
What's your single sentence definition then? I mean, just for fun.
December 01, 2017 at 02:16
So already we agree that the notion is ill-defined? It is a fast and loose term in fact. Just like entropy. Or information. Maybe this is why I am rig...
December 01, 2017 at 01:54
Hmm. Just not convincingly butch coming from you. And more importantly it has no sting. You've got to be able to find a real weakness to pick at here....
December 01, 2017 at 01:05
Sousing? You really do have a tin ear when it comes to your ad homs. It absolutely spoils the effect when you come across as the hyperventilating clas...
December 01, 2017 at 00:52
Why the sudden interest in Nick Lane and Peter Hoffmann? Couldn't possibly be anything I said.
December 01, 2017 at 00:25
I'll find time to respond to your post later. But it is a shame that you bypass the content of my posts to jump straight back to the world from your p...
December 01, 2017 at 00:07
I'd say from experience it goes both ways. These days I live in a small city surrounded by awesome mountains. So taking a trip back to one of the worl...
November 30, 2017 at 21:35
First up, I'm not bothered if my arguments are merely qualitative in your eyes. I am only "merely" doing metaphysics in the first place. So a lot of t...
November 30, 2017 at 21:06
Your questions seem off the point so I’m struggling to know what you actually want. If you have a professional interest, then there is a big literatur...
November 30, 2017 at 11:05
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascendency
November 30, 2017 at 08:42
What do you mean? Either we do blow ourselves up, or we do find a long-run ecological balance. Well, I was just trying to cheer you up. I realise ther...
November 30, 2017 at 03:35
Hah. There certainly is an official position on this. But it is more about what has to be agreed to make the maths come out right than one based on fo...
November 30, 2017 at 03:11
Cheer up Schop. Take the long view. Either humanity will work out what it is about or your wish will be granted. You can wait 50 years surely?
November 30, 2017 at 01:09
Canopy succession is an example. Once a mighty oak has grown to fill a gap, it shades out the competition. So possibilities get removed. The mighty oa...
November 29, 2017 at 23:39
Senescent is probably a bad word choice by Salthe as he means to stress that a climax ecology has become too well adapted to some particular set of en...
November 29, 2017 at 21:10
Give snark and you get snark. Fair enough? Even in philosophy of maths, these are routine debates. And physics doesn't base itself on the "correctness...
November 29, 2017 at 03:33
You do get your knickers in a twist with great rapidity. As you know, that was Michael's terminology. I went along with it for the sake of discussion....
November 29, 2017 at 01:34
Nonsense? I think it really gets us to the heart of some really telling confusion. This is a philosophy discussion group. When things seem unarguably ...
November 28, 2017 at 20:41
If the odds of earth being the case on any one roll are 1 in infinity, then the odds of earth being the case every time in an infinite series of rolls...
November 28, 2017 at 20:33
You are just ignoring the fact that your scenario demands an infinite creation of multiverses. That is different from figuring the odds of repeated co...
November 28, 2017 at 11:47
If you are interested in the best account of this, try Stan Salthe’s story on the immature-mature-senescent arc of living systems. And it would accoun...
November 28, 2017 at 11:39
Jeez, you were serious? The odds of landing on the face marked Earth might be 1/?. The odds of landing on the face marked Earth an infinite number of ...
November 28, 2017 at 11:27
That would be helluva loaded dice. Get you banned from the cosmic casino for sure. It just wouldn’t fit the description of being random. And if every ...
November 28, 2017 at 10:55
Each of your regions would contain about 10^120 degrees of freedom. That would be the entropy content of a Hubble radius. So, naively, we would be tal...
November 28, 2017 at 10:44
Yeah. But you get to pick these infinite sequences out of an infinite hat. So you would pick that exact sequence an infinite number of times. But now ...
November 28, 2017 at 03:40
No. That was indeed necessary to explain how a Big Bang universe could be so remarkably thermally homogenous. And before that, just to resolve Olbers ...
November 28, 2017 at 03:01
Agreed. But any kind of topology could be screened off in that fashion with a sufficiently small hubble radius. Anyway, I see now that SophistiCat rat...
November 28, 2017 at 02:24
Apologies. I thought your mention of a torus was a typo. Didn't realise it had been introduced into the thread. If we lived in a 3-torus, we would be ...
November 28, 2017 at 02:02
You might be surprised. Peirce was Harvard's top of the class for his first degree in chemistry. He was up with the thermodynamics of his time. So yes...
November 28, 2017 at 01:33
The three axes are orthogonal. So not arbitrary but fixed by this exact relation to each other. They don't need to be fixed in terms of some larger "s...
November 28, 2017 at 00:19
I have no problem with decoherence as a formalism that describes the time evolution of the probability of sets of observables. As such, it "safely" si...
November 28, 2017 at 00:13
So you are fine to say the same object can have the two locations at the one time? Cool. We're making progress. The 100% similar obeys the principle o...
November 27, 2017 at 23:24
The point about semiosis is that Peirce worked out a fundamental notion of self-organising relations that could apply both to "the mind" and to "the w...
November 27, 2017 at 23:17