You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael

Comments

Never heard of anyone using bollocks in that way, only in the same way as "damn!" or "rubbish".
October 17, 2017 at 15:41
Dunno, not Australian. Just heard it used in a friendly manner. Perhaps "numpty" is a better example. It might mean "a stupid or ineffectual person", ...
October 17, 2017 at 15:38
I wonder if part of the problem here is that calling someone a "lemon" has different connotations in Britain than it does elsewhere. Here in the UK, i...
October 17, 2017 at 15:31
Reversing Brexit would boost economy, says OECD Right, someone give me the wheel. Time to turn around and go home.
October 17, 2017 at 15:23
Yes, it happens. If you find a post that you believe to be highly offensive dreck, whether by a mod or by a non-mod, then flag it. If another moderato...
October 17, 2017 at 15:02
I didn't intend to call you a crappy person. I intended to make a pun. You're taking it far too personally. I would have said the same thing even if y...
October 17, 2017 at 14:49
I understood the double entendre. That's why I said it. It was a joke, said in response to your claim that the moderators in that discussion were purp...
October 17, 2017 at 14:42
They weren't bitter sarcasm. They were facetious. Much like my joke about bitter lemons. I would hazard a guess as to assume all of them were. Which, ...
October 17, 2017 at 14:13
I haven't. None of my comments were purple-prosed, hyperbolic, or ill-tempered. Neither was andrewk's. jamalrob and Hanover didn't post. So, again, at...
October 17, 2017 at 14:02
As far as I can see, I made two "terse, biting little comments": Note, incidentally, that neither were actually in response to someone arguing against...
October 17, 2017 at 13:54
I've just gone through all my posts in that discussion. I can't find any of mine that are "purple prose-laden, hyperbolic, and ill-tempered". Also, Ha...
October 17, 2017 at 13:40
The thing about the gun-control discussion is that I don't even see it as a left vs right issue at all. Conservatives in the UK seem to be as much in ...
October 17, 2017 at 13:03
Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations.
October 16, 2017 at 19:08
We were only bitter because we had to deal with so many lemons.
October 16, 2017 at 18:39
This is really confused. It's not at all how these things work. I'm applying the principle of charity. Sure, and he could also decide to just break hi...
October 16, 2017 at 14:33
You just strengthen the initial premise to "Pinocchio's nose grows if and only if he tells a falsehood". You just strengthen Socrates' reply to "you w...
October 16, 2017 at 14:20
So the issue is that only an actual contradiction can satisfy the imperative. It's the same issue that arises with Buridan's bridge and the Pinocchio ...
October 16, 2017 at 13:59
Perhaps, but that's not relevant in this case as the OP isn't really arguing in favour of prescriptivism over cognitivism but is asking if the imperat...
October 16, 2017 at 13:47
That's debatable. A prescriptivist will argue that ethical sentences, which might appear to be truth-apt propositions, are actually imperatives, so "o...
October 16, 2017 at 13:41
As I said, I don't know anything about your case, but in the case of Thanatos I didn't think it deserving of deletion. It had nothing to do with him b...
October 16, 2017 at 09:49
Actually, sorry, I may have been confusing Thanatos with John Harris. Thought you were talking about this discussion.
October 16, 2017 at 09:38
I don't know anything about your post that was deleted, but I remember Thanatos' and I didn't think it warranted that they should be deleted. You said...
October 16, 2017 at 09:28
Willow? She's awesome. Actually, they all are. It's just a great show.
October 15, 2017 at 12:14
It ain't.
October 15, 2017 at 12:11
Buffy is one of the best TV shows ever. Just a few months ago I went back and watched it all (and Angel).
October 15, 2017 at 12:10
Wesley Wyndam-Pryce. He was in both, although it wasn't until Angel that he called himself a rogue demon hunter. He became quite the bad-ass.
October 15, 2017 at 12:08
Aha. Proof that Hachem ain't had no education.
October 15, 2017 at 12:00
Well, we have a ban-gun.
October 15, 2017 at 11:58
It's not even that (@"jamalrob" excepted). We're just volunteer security guards.
October 15, 2017 at 11:54
I think both parents deserve credit, not just one of them. I think the notion of "natural" rights isn't a very clear one. What sort of thing is entitl...
October 14, 2017 at 15:08
This seems like nonsense. Attraction is just due to brain chemistry. A physiological response to certain types of visual (or other) stimulation. In mo...
October 14, 2017 at 14:36
Correlation does not imply causation. It could be that those with promiscuous desires just aren't as suited to long-term monogamous relationships as t...
October 14, 2017 at 14:27
Same thing. Is that controversial?
October 14, 2017 at 14:22
S?o?m?e?t?h?i?n?g? ?c?o?n?t?r?o?v?e?r?s?i?a?l? ? Edited by Hanover.
October 14, 2017 at 14:20
Some of them aren't even science.
October 14, 2017 at 13:35
Congress. The Congressional Budget Office and The Department of the Treasury. The Department of Justice.
October 14, 2017 at 13:32
Trump walked into a bar. "I invented bars, you know. Mine are the best." he said, before getting his bribe from Putin and leaving. Better?
October 14, 2017 at 12:49
The problem with that is that all discussions appear on the main page, irrespective of category (unless you manually turn them off here). So moving ba...
October 14, 2017 at 12:42
I agree with you @"SophistiCat", but I'm not sure if you do. ;)
October 14, 2017 at 11:39
Why shouldn't moderators be allowed to vote? We're posters as well.
October 14, 2017 at 11:35
Not strict enough.
October 14, 2017 at 11:32
More like an old man, an owl, and whatever I am (a disembodied suit?).
October 13, 2017 at 23:26
The bit where I said "I don't think has anything to do with metaphysics" and you responded with the rhetorical "Oh and I said it is? :s", despite the ...
October 13, 2017 at 14:20
You said "I think the phenomenon of transexualism involves such a degree of infatuation of desire with its object that the object is transformed from ...
October 13, 2017 at 13:41
The nature of the self is. Someone born with the male genitals and wanting to be a woman isn't.
October 13, 2017 at 13:23
I don't think it has anything to do with metaphysics.
October 13, 2017 at 13:12
Well, body-rejection. Not everybody equates their self with their body.
October 13, 2017 at 13:00
Clearly not everybody accepts the claim that the right body is the one you're born with.
October 13, 2017 at 12:51
I forgot it. @"Baden": come on, this has got to be as good as @"Sapientia"'s piranha snack joke?
October 13, 2017 at 10:58
October 13, 2017 at 10:57