You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mutakalem

['Member']Joined: August 28, 2020 at 17:43Last active: September 19, 2020 at 04:362 discussions7 comments

Discussions (2)

Comments

In: Contingency argument Ibn Sina (Avicenna)  — view comment
I am using a law of bi-valence here, speaking metaphysically/rationally. Things could have been in another way. For example a matter that needs to be ...
September 19, 2020 at 04:37
In: Omnipotence argument, what do you think?  — view comment
I really think what's evil was defined evil by the ex-nhilo creating God, you cannot use what he created to define it as wrong or right, he's God, he ...
September 10, 2020 at 16:36
In: Omnipotence argument, what do you think?  — view comment
1) I mean by possible essence is that anything that can rationally exist (Its possibility in existing in any possible world doesn't make any logical c...
September 09, 2020 at 23:55
In: Omnipotence argument, what do you think?  — view comment
Possible essence is possible state of existence, possible things maybe yeah..
September 04, 2020 at 15:47
In: Omnipotence argument, what do you think?  — view comment
I don't know man, I am just inspecting valid arguments for God.. I mean no harm nor force my beliefs on others..
August 29, 2020 at 04:17
In: Omnipotence argument, what do you think?  — view comment
Are you familiar with contingency and emergence VS Necessity? To put it simple: What I argue here is, either the potentiality of any probable essence ...
August 29, 2020 at 00:31
In: Omnipotence argument, what do you think?  — view comment
If emergent, then possible essences did not accept existence before the emergence of this potential. Entailing that possible essences were not possibl...
August 29, 2020 at 00:13
⇧