You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Malcolm Lett

Comments

I considered doing that and then deleted it. I knew if I wrote a summary then people would read that and jump to conclusions without reading the whole...
September 09, 2020 at 00:59
My understanding of ? is that it means exactly you originally quoted it as: "there exists some ....". So a statement that ?m(m is a man and m is Greek...
September 06, 2020 at 08:49
Sadly @"Wayfarer" and @"JerseyFlight" have just epitomised a number of points that @"Ansiktsburk" was raising : discussions that go off topic and prod...
September 04, 2020 at 04:13
Wow. Nice summary. You have thoroughly convinced me of the need to learn more about triadicism.
August 31, 2020 at 10:12
Interesting. You don't think that term is suitable for generalising into the virtual? ie: simulated physicality?
August 30, 2020 at 09:49
Likewise. I'm equally annoyed by those who claim conscious experience isn't something of importance, just because they can't measure it or account for...
August 30, 2020 at 09:30
I'm simply referring to the fact that different systems/individuals can have differing degrees of understanding. eg: my calculator has zero of underst...
August 30, 2020 at 09:13
I'm not ignoring all the history of how humans came to be. I was focusing on a particular behaviour to highlight that we can introspect ourselves - ie...
August 30, 2020 at 09:00
@"apokrisis" do you know what term would apply semiotics to cognitive computation, irrespective of the physical substrate? I like the idea behind Patt...
August 30, 2020 at 08:51
There is indeed some difficulty associated with the subject trying to objectively analyse themselves, or a researcher attempting to analyse the subjec...
August 30, 2020 at 07:20
Precisely. If science was truly restricted to what we understand then we never would have got to where we are today. The reality is that people aren't...
August 30, 2020 at 06:54
Cheers. Appreciated.
August 30, 2020 at 00:29
I see only two rational possibilities: 1. everything is physical 2. everything is metaphysical Modern science takes #1 as assumed and tries to slowly ...
August 30, 2020 at 00:26
Yes. That looks promising. I think it offers some useful tools for "measuring" more of the explanatory gap. Biosemiotics basically says three things: ...
August 30, 2020 at 00:09
The problem is the assumption that 'understanding' is binary. A calculator understands maths in much the same way as the room in the Chinese Room anal...
August 29, 2020 at 22:04
This is pretty much my view too. Almost Dennet-like, I suppose. That in the long run we'll figure out the mechanisms and we'll see all of consciousnes...
August 29, 2020 at 21:55
Hmm, yes. I see I'm going to have a hard time picking the right words.
August 29, 2020 at 20:25
Its interesting that it still treats consciousness as a separate thing from those other qualities. My own opinion is that it will ultimately be proven...
August 29, 2020 at 08:24
Oh. I've got some reading to do. Thanks.
August 29, 2020 at 06:14
Greetings. I've been looking for a suitable forum to share some of my own ideas on consciousness. I've been thinking about it on and off since 2014 an...
August 27, 2020 at 10:25