Hmmmmm. A really interesting idea here, but the analogy is pretty faulty once you consider a few things. You are asserting that: P1) We have an aversi...
`Hi Robbiefrost, It doesn’t seem like you are advocating for a specific side here, but some of the questions you have raised are interesting. So, I’ll...
My entire quote was, "You have made several points elsewhere on this post to say that certain morally bad things, like racism and slavery, “must exist...
Hey TheMadFool, hope you are well. I appreciate the post about the problem of natural evil, as I find it fairly difficult to reconcile with the omnibe...
Hi Batsushi, I think we can both agree that chronic pain sucks and that this argument from back pain is somewhat a personal repackaging of the problem...
You are right about the first part here. I haven't offered my own beliefs on the topic, not because I seek to defend agnosticism and the "inconclusive...
Hey Judaka, That’s a good point, I definitely don’t think a climate change denier should be off the hook because of “inconclusiveness”. the reasonable...
Hi Gnomon, What if it’s not a matter of feeling that a God is necessary, but that alternative theories about existence don't seem to be satisfactory f...
Hi Tim! Yeah i think I didn’t make it clear what I meant with valid and non-conclusive. In my response to Dingo I think I clarified what I meant a lit...
Hey Dingo, Thanks for catching this, I think I meant to say, “ If a belief has valid arguments defending it, though they are non-conclusive, then it i...
Hi Jjnan1, I think that my primary concern with this argument is premise 1, and that the FTA makes claims about the existence of life in the universe ...
“The standard argument, used by apologists in countless books and all over the internet, for Christianity is that the alleged resurrection of Jesus ma...
Comments