You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

Feeling impatient is one thing, showing it another; there is private experience as distinct from public behavior after all...
April 15, 2023 at 05:53
Thanks...don't you just love pedantry?
April 15, 2023 at 02:49
I agree it's not a simple equation, otherwise Being and Time would be just Being. And there is of course a conceptual difference between #being# and #...
April 15, 2023 at 02:46
Even a coma wants life support...
April 15, 2023 at 01:25
The equation of being and time seems to be a truistic pseudo-profundity if it is accepted that time is nothing over and above change, and being is not...
April 15, 2023 at 01:09
Apparently I misunderstood you then; my apologies. Cheers Tom.
April 15, 2023 at 00:55
He critiques onto-theology, but perhaps that is a screen (for himself and others).
April 14, 2023 at 23:18
I think you're right on the ball here. Knowing other people are conscious is not a propositional knowing, like knowing it is raining, it is a sense of...
April 14, 2023 at 22:32
Almost nobody reads anybody's posts charitably and thoroughly as far as I have been able to tell judging by the bulk of replies. For what it's worth, ...
April 14, 2023 at 22:07
Thanks, I have read that book, but maybe twenty years ago. I think it is still on the shelves somewhere, so I might revisit it. Another example is sem...
April 14, 2023 at 21:59
Right, death is the other face of the manifest universe, the twin of non-being to the universal being, the dark unknowable counterpart to the sunlit k...
April 14, 2023 at 21:44
What god is there other than the universe? It presents us with the face of the knowable and the face of the unknowable. We cannot but be its followers...
April 14, 2023 at 11:22
No, I'm saying just give me a brief rundown of a current theory. I'm saying I've never heard of any cogent explanation for how matter can give rise to...
April 14, 2023 at 11:17
Promissory notes or wrigglin' and squirmin' won't cut it. Present an account or admit you cannot.
April 14, 2023 at 09:43
:up: I don't see how it is possible not to be confused about it.
April 14, 2023 at 08:45
All that signifies for me is the seeing of both sides of the argument. I don't hold any magical views, but I also don't dismiss the possibility.
April 14, 2023 at 08:44
Can you cite anywhere where I've peddled any magical theory?
April 14, 2023 at 08:28
The difference is we have a basic idea of how things become hot; and idea which is consistent with all our understanding of combustion, chemical actio...
April 14, 2023 at 08:27
I agree we are always already linguistic once having been inducted into a language; I just don't think it follows that we are therefore linguistic thr...
April 14, 2023 at 08:23
How do you know that no one can suspend the linguistic/ conceptual function and just see whatever it is they are seeing without identifying what it is...
April 14, 2023 at 07:25
We have a pretty clear physicalist understanding of how, for example, a material object can become hot; by agitation of the molecules.Do you have an e...
April 14, 2023 at 07:22
Recognition would not seem to require language since animals can do it. So perceiving a dog as a dog is ambiguous. A dog recognizes other dogs as her ...
April 14, 2023 at 07:15
Yes, riddled with that and many other dualistic cliches...can we escape it discursively?
April 14, 2023 at 04:12
It seems obvious: we witness dances, we don't witness meanings, purposes and consciousness.
April 14, 2023 at 03:13
So, the indirect realist asserts a reality (what the world is like in itself) beyond appearances. In any case doesn't perception inform us about about...
April 13, 2023 at 23:00
The universe is a two faced god and we are its two faced acolytes.. They have strict codes of conduct those Pythagorean Punk sages: don't bring up the...
April 13, 2023 at 22:26
Interesting thanks.
April 13, 2023 at 09:02
Of course, do you?
April 13, 2023 at 09:00
It's possible the dominance is regional and shifting. Perhaps starling still predominate in some areas. It's an interesting subject I may researvh whe...
April 13, 2023 at 06:29
When I was a kid living in Epping, a Sydney suburb, it was Starlings, no Mynas. The Starlings were supplanted by Mynas, and I never saw Starlings agai...
April 13, 2023 at 06:05
Adjective and noun: a wise sage.
April 13, 2023 at 01:29
I don't think we can identify sages reliably...maybe other sages can. Even then maybe there are not 'universal' sages but rather musical sages, mathem...
April 13, 2023 at 00:24
I actually agree with you. There is no captain at the helm of the ship of state, and to rerun the old metaphor, what is presently being done in the na...
April 13, 2023 at 00:16
NIce retort and a fair point. Perhaps I should have said "undecidable" instead of "meaningless". We just see which ones are the best. :razz: Seriously...
April 12, 2023 at 23:54
I agree with you; I was really just pointing out that any analysis is necessarily dualistic. In the East awakening is understood to be a return to a u...
April 12, 2023 at 23:44
I think it is pretty much universal: when people see or feel a quality, they tend to think others should see or feel it too. You dislike both but can ...
April 12, 2023 at 23:19
It was Kant who pointed out that when we deem something to possess aesthetic value, we take ourselves to be talking about something universal. and not...
April 12, 2023 at 22:48
And the way you see it is completely free from bias, right?
April 12, 2023 at 22:26
Right, but the thrust of the Euthyphro dilemma is the undecidability between whether something is good because the gods love it or whether the gods lo...
April 12, 2023 at 21:56
:up: Some good subtle analysis from both of you there! These points in particular I strongly agree with. Complete, or even substantial revolution: des...
April 12, 2023 at 05:37
The point is that the theist can say that, in her view, the creation is good, and that God loves it because it is good and it is good because God love...
April 12, 2023 at 05:09
I don't see how the thought of being in something is not dualistic. The thought of simply being is not dualistic, but when it 'in-the-world' is posite...
April 12, 2023 at 01:15
Right, you could interpret "neither true nor false" as not not merely not demonstrably true or false but as not capable of being true or false.
April 12, 2023 at 00:39
I agree the claim that theism is true should be challenged, even dismissed, but not on the grounds that it is demonstrably untrue, but that it is demo...
April 12, 2023 at 00:25
That was a dilemma in the context of the Greek gods, because they might disagree with one another about what is good. It is a false dilemma in the mon...
April 12, 2023 at 00:18
The same kind of thing happened in the Sydney art scene in the late sixties and early seventies. But I see that as tribal politics being enacted by in...
April 11, 2023 at 23:54
Right, but people don't fight egregiously over whether Rembrandt was a greater artist than Leonardo or Jackson Pollock is better than Andy Warhol, or ...
April 11, 2023 at 23:15
Conversely atheists may claim that a calling to science is higher than a calling to religion, which would be an equally arrogant claim. The world woul...
April 11, 2023 at 22:55
Excellent OP, Tom! The way I see it there is beauty in courage and cowardice is ugly. Greed, jealousy, hatred, exploitation and cruelty are ugly. Gene...
April 11, 2023 at 22:35
Very well described! I agree wholeheartedly.
April 11, 2023 at 21:45