You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

If only the neurophysiology could still handle it! :’(
September 15, 2016 at 06:41
Yeah, I'm old enough to remember those... or should I have said "old enough to have experienced and young enough to remember'?
September 15, 2016 at 06:13
What's a "red night"? Sounds intriguing...or wicked... >:)
September 15, 2016 at 05:01
I agree with this; poetry is no substitute for philosophy. But it's also true that philosophy is no substitute for poetry. Poetic philosophy and philo...
September 15, 2016 at 04:56
:)
September 15, 2016 at 04:03
Cheers :)
September 15, 2016 at 03:44
This doesn't contradict what I have been saying at all. I haven't said the two account become one at all. But they do not "express a unity" ( you ar c...
September 15, 2016 at 03:26
You're falling into the same mistake again. There can be freedom in cogitans,(the mind) because the mind freely chooses one reason over another. There...
September 15, 2016 at 03:13
Apparently I was mistaken about getting the idea there is no identity across time for the Cyreniacs from you then. It's true that at any time we have ...
September 15, 2016 at 03:09
As in my response to TWoD, I think Spinoza in a way sets the stage for Kant also. The unity of substance is not exhausted by either of its attributes ...
September 15, 2016 at 02:52
You are falling into the same trap Spinoza did. He posited that cogitans and extensa are the two possible attributes, that is, 'parrallel' accounts of...
September 15, 2016 at 02:45
I wouldn't agree that those orientations "obscure what's really going on"; I think they both reveal aspects of whats going on that would otherwise not...
September 15, 2016 at 02:36
Fair enough, I suppose; but for me that's a one-sided psychologically based story; right enough from its own perspective, but severely limited by its ...
September 15, 2016 at 02:29
Personally, I have never found any notion of free will even intelligible, let alone convincing, other than the libertarian.
September 15, 2016 at 02:11
I agree the intelligibility of interactionism seems on one hand to be very the main problem for him, but on the other hand, since he envisages nature ...
September 15, 2016 at 02:08
8-)
September 15, 2016 at 00:15
No, seriously, I just want to understand your thought process in considering those you mentioned to be "far greater", is all.
September 15, 2016 at 00:13
Yes, fair enough. I introduced "immediate" because my understanding (derived from something you have written previously I'm pretty sure) is that the C...
September 15, 2016 at 00:11
Seamless variance in a spatial sense is instanced by any surface which is not homogeneous, but which shows no clear boundaries between the different a...
September 14, 2016 at 23:56
It's interesting that, in their own different ways the philosophies of Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz all seem to make free will impossible. Descartes...
September 14, 2016 at 23:42
Me???? Outraged?????? ;)
September 14, 2016 at 23:36
I don't know what it could mean to say that truth is objective. The idea of truth seems to be the idea of something really being the case; the idea of...
September 14, 2016 at 23:34
Seriously??? Far greater what? Philosophers? Writers? Human beings?
September 14, 2016 at 23:19
Here again you seem to be demanding that a process that may be seamlessly variant, both temporally and spatially, must consist in series of static mom...
September 14, 2016 at 22:29
If the fool on the hill understands the world. (Why is he always on the hill, by the way?).
September 14, 2016 at 10:29
The idea that pleasure is the only "good" that is sought for its own sake seems entirely unconvincing; in fact I would go further; I don't think it ev...
September 14, 2016 at 09:16
Your proposal that there is a "problem" involving an intermediate state between being and becoming or between the being and non-being of a thing, seem...
September 14, 2016 at 03:17
None of what you say here shows that you have the least understanding of what I have been saying or that you are making any effort to genuinely engage...
September 13, 2016 at 21:34
If you want to claim that views and the claims they make are not necessarily logically dependent on presuppositions that underpin them and do not them...
September 13, 2016 at 03:03
It seems to me you're not interested in serious discussion at all, just in mouthing off. As such, there is no point engaging with you. I wonder how ma...
September 12, 2016 at 23:09
This is incomplete, it should read "Logic is nothing more than how all individuals think about the world at the most abstract, generalized "level" of ...
September 12, 2016 at 23:06
This is again nonsense. If someone is looking out on a view of the mountains and there is say a cabin which is clearly visible; but she simply doesn't...
September 12, 2016 at 22:59
There is either one 'correct' version of naive realism or there are various versions of it. Which one do you want to claim?
September 12, 2016 at 22:56
This is quite wrong. If some naive realists don't see some logical entailment of their view and posit that as part of it, and other naive realists do ...
September 12, 2016 at 22:55
The problem is that if there are a whole lot of naive realists who all believe different things, as you claim, then there could be no coherent view th...
September 12, 2016 at 22:50
It would depend on the conception of God you are concerned with and whether the logic of that conception is compatible with the logic of free will, de...
September 12, 2016 at 22:36
A precondition for understanding the world: that the world is always already conceptually articulated.
September 12, 2016 at 22:20
Naive realism may logically entail things that some naive realists are not aware that it entails, so yes, their view might not be what they think it i...
September 12, 2016 at 22:03
Many people are naive realists to be sure; from that it doesn't follow that they have necessarily worked through all the logical concomitants of their...
September 12, 2016 at 21:59
Seems ridiculous to ask someone for empirical evidence to support the correctness of their characterization of a metaphysical standpoint.Thinking abou...
September 12, 2016 at 21:40
I was saying something along the lines that, for example, if an envatted person calls a vat a 'tull' then if he was able to visit the real world of th...
September 12, 2016 at 10:09
But if the virtual brains and vats are modeled on real brains and vats in the programmers world, it wouldn't then seem to matter what words are used, ...
September 12, 2016 at 09:55
If that's the way you want to stipulate it, then does the name really matter anyway? The programmers would have chosen brains and vats as perceptible ...
September 12, 2016 at 09:42
if you want to say that, then you are claiming that the link between word and object must be intentional, and in terms of the user of the name, not th...
September 12, 2016 at 09:27
I suppose you could talk about all the real composite parts that make up the dragon being simulated, but I am still not convinced that it makes proper...
September 11, 2016 at 23:47
This is taken out of context db; Levinas is referring only to passively endured suffering. The kind of suffering that is inflicted by an active evil a...
September 11, 2016 at 06:11
Then you should make it more clear if you are not referring to what you think are your real qualities; I am not a mind-reader. Clarity is the foundati...
September 10, 2016 at 23:40
This is not entirely true for a start; some knives are designed for spreading. In any case knives are designed to cut a variety of different materials...
September 10, 2016 at 22:53
This lame argument quite obviously fails simply because there are real meteorites and a real Earth, whereas there are no real dragons. The notion of s...
September 10, 2016 at 22:03
So, there is not a great variety of different kinds of knives made for different purposes? I am well aware that Aristotle did not explicitly speak abo...
September 10, 2016 at 21:56