You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

If God can be experienced it would not be like experiencing any empirical object, which may be reliably available as a public object. It would be more...
November 02, 2016 at 07:51
In: Qualia  — view comment
So, what was the fact prior to its discovery?
November 02, 2016 at 07:16
Are space aliens purportedly empirical entities?
November 02, 2016 at 01:36
But who's really doing the ignoring here? I already explained, against this very kind of point, that the mistake you guys are making lies in thinking ...
November 02, 2016 at 01:21
What it is possible to know from the deliverances of pure reason and empirical observation, yes.
November 02, 2016 at 01:03
No, he posted here to let would-be philosophers know that he has come to a belief which is precisely not up for discussion because it has not been arr...
November 01, 2016 at 21:54
But the problem is the bare noumenon hypothesis doesn't actually explain our experience at all, but rather it says that we can never know (discursivel...
November 01, 2016 at 21:16
So, his judgement is not a matter for him, but rather a matter for... who?,,,You? Whose reason? What kind of evidence? This is hilarious! :s >:O :D X-...
November 01, 2016 at 21:10
In: Qualia  — view comment
So, for you there are no unknown facts about the universe that are yet to be discovered? Such as for example, whether some particular distant galaxy h...
November 01, 2016 at 21:03
But what use is a 'reality' which never be real to us; but rather only the source of endless skepticism?
November 01, 2016 at 20:59
Brain, I think the mistake you are making lies in thinking of the 'entities' encountered in mystical experiences in terms such that they must be eithe...
November 01, 2016 at 20:57
So, for you there is nothing at all, in the sense of nothing real beyond the phenomenal, then?
November 01, 2016 at 20:40
Your examples and attitude seems so typical of what I call the 'intellectual mediocracy' as to be somewhat laughable. Although I have to say I find me...
November 01, 2016 at 02:48
Yes, unless you have had such an experience, you understandably would not be able to imagine it. It would be like a man deaf from birth trying to imag...
November 01, 2016 at 02:40
I doubt the veracity of the story, and others like it, about the aboriginals not even being able to see the ship. Of course they would not have been a...
November 01, 2016 at 00:09
So, is "our particular kind of processing system" itself noumenal or phenomenal? Because if you say it is phenomenal and that we have no warrant for s...
October 31, 2016 at 22:01
No, I don't read it that way. I would say that, if the honesty of his account be granted, he became utterly convinced at the moment of experience, and...
October 31, 2016 at 21:51
The things in themselves are objectively real in the sense that they are reliably available to be be perceived. It seems obvious from experience that ...
October 31, 2016 at 21:43
I cannot see anywhere in the OP where he gives a process of reasoning for his belief in God. He specifically says his belief is simply on account of e...
October 31, 2016 at 21:17
Perhaps the word 'absence' creates confusion here. We may experience the existence of God, as palpably as we experience the existence of a tree. But w...
October 31, 2016 at 21:15
The consciousness, self-consciousness and non-predictable responses I can understand. Are you saying, though, that if someone possessed no emotions or...
October 31, 2016 at 20:51
I'm surprised that some of you don't seem to understand that Colin's testimony was never meant to be an argument for the existence of God. I don't thi...
October 31, 2016 at 20:34
In: Qualia  — view comment
I do think of myself as a kind of realist; I used to say I am a logical realist. I think this is kind of like Kant's notion of being an empirical real...
October 31, 2016 at 20:03
In: Qualia  — view comment
A dinosaur is only a dinosaur insofar as it is conceived of as such. The name applies only to something familiar to us as an object, or possible objec...
October 31, 2016 at 04:13
You only included half the picture. Without the existence of others there can be no self; so if the existence of others is neither subjective nor obje...
October 31, 2016 at 02:12
I don't believe such fundamentalist notions are either widespread or widely preached. I would say that if you don't go to fundamentalist churches or m...
October 30, 2016 at 22:53
This leaves me wondering what you think personhood consists in.
October 30, 2016 at 22:37
Sure, that might hold if you are operating under the presupposition that intelligence is mechanistic or modular.
October 30, 2016 at 22:24
That's a specifically rationalist image of the idea of enlightenment; the project of the West. The Oriental project has actually been quite the opposi...
October 30, 2016 at 21:39
For me the key to being genuine lies in seeing what is specific to each situation rather than what is general. This ties in with intuition. And to ans...
October 30, 2016 at 08:14
I don't think of stoicism as a system, so much as a set of recommended exercises; exercises designed to free you of attachments to things, situations ...
October 30, 2016 at 07:01
Sure, but they only provide an understanding of religious belief, behavior and experience 'from without' as they are seen as objectified empirical phe...
October 30, 2016 at 04:23
Thanks for your explanation Punshhh, it makes your position clearer to me. I think it would be a great idea to create a thread to discuss these ideas....
October 30, 2016 at 04:19
In: Qualia  — view comment
You see the red cup via your representation of it. The red cup is what appears via your and others' representations of it. It doesn't make sense to sa...
October 30, 2016 at 02:02
In: Qualia  — view comment
Since the idea of the thing-in-itself is precisely the (admittedly empty or apophatic) idea of what is not part of the phenomenal realm, what you say ...
October 30, 2016 at 01:20
In: Qualia  — view comment
I'm not sure what school of thought you refer to here. The central point about the noumenon, which is the idea of the 'in itself', is that we cannot k...
October 30, 2016 at 00:45
In: Qualia  — view comment
For parsimony's sake it is better to stick with the example at hand. So, explain to me how the chess program obeys the laws of physics.
October 29, 2016 at 23:59
In: Qualia  — view comment
All this example seems to show is that it is a category error to speak of the chess program either obeying or disobeying the laws of physics.
October 29, 2016 at 23:41
In: Qualia  — view comment
I would say that how and what we think about the question concerning the dependency and direction of dependency between mind and matter is itself depe...
October 29, 2016 at 23:23
In: Qualia  — view comment
Yes but on this account "to be itself" is not to be anything at all; and so seems somewhat oxymoronic.
October 29, 2016 at 23:10
In: Qualia  — view comment
These two statements seem to contradict one another, or to be, at the very least, inconsistent with one another. If states of the world cannot be expl...
October 29, 2016 at 23:06
In: Qualia  — view comment
The fact is, though, that we really do only know things, know what things are, in the context of them being experienced by us. Put another way, we onl...
October 29, 2016 at 03:42
Of course whatever is communicated must be communicated in the language and the terms of the culture in which it is communicated; but from that obviou...
October 29, 2016 at 00:44
This is simply not true, or at least it is merely a perfunctory truism. Because the writings of mystics and sages, like all writings, are associated w...
October 28, 2016 at 22:31
In: Qualia  — view comment
It sounds to me like you are claiming 'noumenon' and 'subject' are synonymous. I can actually see some logic to this idea, but I doubt it is the logic...
October 28, 2016 at 22:17
In: Qualia  — view comment
:D X-) >:) Of course, come to think about it, conversely Willow knows just how it feels as well.
October 28, 2016 at 22:07
In: Qualia  — view comment
That's funny, because the meaning of 'subject' that is alternative to "aware experiencer" or "conscious agent" is something along the lines of "area o...
October 28, 2016 at 22:03
In: Qualia  — view comment
I'm still trying to understand what it could possibly mean to be a "non-reductive materialist". if the mind is not reducible to material, then "states...
October 28, 2016 at 21:45
In: Qualia  — view comment
This seems to be an obvious truistic definition of mind. I am trying to find out what the materialist thinks mind is if he wants to say both that mind...
October 28, 2016 at 21:21
It would be logically inconsistent to claim that there are more than one absolute, supreme, all-encompassing deity; but that is not the claim. Zeus, H...
October 28, 2016 at 20:46