You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

The constant formation of new modes is known only in the formation of the modes themselves. The constancy of this formation of modes is known only fin...
February 23, 2017 at 02:07
You are the person being dishonest here. You said: You are saying here that my reading a post is a mode; so I am saying 'right, then, it is an activit...
February 23, 2017 at 01:09
Reading a post is an activity. You say it is a mode, and yet you denied modes are activities. :s
February 23, 2017 at 00:46
You're just playing with words.
February 23, 2017 at 00:17
What are modes if they are not activity? Spinoza, I seem to recall, refers to the modes as "affections of substance", thus he sees them not as general...
February 23, 2017 at 00:09
Agutsino claims God is an activity. I haven't said that God is the modes: I have asked what He is over and above the activity ( the only activity we k...
February 22, 2017 at 23:53
This is so only because in principle the set of, say, even numbers, can be placed in one to one correspondence with the set of both even and odd numbe...
February 22, 2017 at 23:22
Coherent alternative. What is it then? Surely you don't mean this?: I've already dealt with that. This is utter garbage, Agustino, and I suspect you k...
February 22, 2017 at 23:12
Didn't I say in my previous post that it is not possible, actually or logically (in principle in other words) to finish counting an infinite series. I...
February 22, 2017 at 04:48
You answered the question yourself in the previous paragraph. I think you are being unnecessarily pedantic about what is a self-evident and trivial po...
February 22, 2017 at 03:47
As someone already pointed out, countability is defined as the ability to place a set, whether finite or infinite, in one to one correspondence with t...
February 22, 2017 at 00:56
This is a nonsense reading of what I said. You are trying to understand the infinite, eternal process of unification in finite and temporal terms. In ...
February 22, 2017 at 00:29
Where did I state or imply "God has a beginning"?
February 22, 2017 at 00:20
True, but I know some highly intelligent well-educated people, who are extremely disaffected with the modern global democratic market machine who have...
February 22, 2017 at 00:11
Well I find that simply incredible, but since I haven't gone to personally ask "a great number of religious believers" to explain precisely what they ...
February 22, 2017 at 00:04
God is never merely "a viewpoint"; God always experiences every possible viewpoint, and no one of them in particular. So, you are incorrect, no limita...
February 22, 2017 at 00:01
Sure, it can only come from the mind; the arse (corrected spelling, yours means a donkey) produces only shit. The mind is an organ of interpretation; ...
February 21, 2017 at 23:56
Yes, you keep saying that, but I am yet to find a coherent account of an alternative view. Maybe I'll discover one when I get further into the Machere...
February 21, 2017 at 23:43
Regarding your first point, I was referring specifically to the the decline of religious belief in the advanced industrial societies, because that is ...
February 21, 2017 at 23:27
Yes, and there is no experience beyond all the many experiences of individuals. These experiences and the individuals are what Spinoza refers to as 'm...
February 21, 2017 at 22:48
Substance is literally nothing except its modes. Why should I love nothing? In accordance with Spinoza's philosophy, God's experience is nothing witho...
February 21, 2017 at 22:19
Yes, but organized religion as a whole has declined insofar as it has failed to adapt to the prevailing modern scientific worldview. Now, maybe such i...
February 21, 2017 at 22:06
Sorry, I missed that. In any case, from Wiki: "Mainline Protestants were a majority of all Christians in the United States until the mid-20th century,...
February 21, 2017 at 03:53
Have you got any argument to support your claim that religious organizations escape the common condition constraining all things such that they must a...
February 21, 2017 at 02:50
I said "How do you know it is "new age"?", referring to the Center he founded and you said "look at his videos". Since, as you admit, his videos are n...
February 21, 2017 at 02:45
Knowledge, in any determinate sense of the term, can only be phenomenal or logical. If we think there are no conditions that do not appear as phenomen...
February 21, 2017 at 02:38
Rubbish. It's adapt or become extinct. His videos are not the Center..doh! If that's your penchant, then off you go... :-}
February 21, 2017 at 01:54
Some traditional (or even contemporary) Franciscans might. You cannot possibly speak for all of them. Are you saying there can be no change within rel...
February 21, 2017 at 01:35
Seems to me you are being quite unnecessarily judgemental. After all, his target audience is not professional or even serious amateur philosophers. Th...
February 21, 2017 at 01:17
Do you have any actual evidence for your confidence that he is a rich man?
February 21, 2017 at 01:01
But you're not understanding anything that is not purely tautologous; that self-definition is self-definition, in other words. Sure, anything is defin...
February 21, 2017 at 00:56
This is absolute nonsense, Willow; any finite entity is defined in terms of its attributes and relations to other entities. These definitions are form...
February 20, 2017 at 23:39
I don't even know what that could mean unless it means that substance is infinite personalty. Anyway, I am enjoying the book. I do find this a fascina...
February 20, 2017 at 23:30
Then why should we care about substance one way or another or spend any time thinking about it? As I have pointed out before the idea of substance as ...
February 20, 2017 at 23:24
The point is Willow, that we can coherently define things only in terms of other things. To say that something can only be defined in itself or throug...
February 20, 2017 at 23:21
But I have read the Ethics, and Spinoza cannot explain how substance produces its attributes and modes. The whole thing has intuitive appeal for sure,...
February 20, 2017 at 23:14
All you have done in pretending that we know what self-defining means is to repeat in different words, that we know it defines itself. We define it as...
February 20, 2017 at 23:05
I said something must be useful, beautiful or personal to you in order to be significant. I could have added other categories like good, admirable, an...
February 20, 2017 at 23:03
If all we can say about Substance is that it is self-defining; that it's definition is simply that it is self-defining; then that is really no definit...
February 20, 2017 at 22:55
Yes, I have thought this myself. But the way it is stated in the Ethics certainly makes it seem that Spinoza has a quantitative sense in mind. And I d...
February 20, 2017 at 22:46
If you understand something that isn't stated by an author then you have no way of knowing whether that understanding is truly a reading of or a readi...
February 20, 2017 at 22:35
But since we cannot say what that activity is it is not really an activity at all for us. It is a purported, and yet incomprehensible, 'activity'; so ...
February 20, 2017 at 22:30
Think about entities in the world. An entities can have significance for you only insofar as it is either useful, beautiful, or you can have a persona...
February 20, 2017 at 22:27
God can be understood to have both an immanent and a transcendent aspect. The same applies to being; it has both a phenomenal and a noumenal aspect; i...
February 20, 2017 at 22:06
The "materialist" supposition sees to the truth of this. The working of the brain cannot fail to be real - because our brain is embedded within realit...
February 20, 2017 at 21:44
You haven't shown that at all, you have merely asserted it.
February 20, 2017 at 01:44
Yes but is it true or knowable beyond the human domain? If you say "No' then it is just logic as understood by us, and it may have no significance bey...
February 20, 2017 at 01:43
That sounds like a worthwhile and interesting project. I can sympathize insofar as I have been self-employed for pretty much my entire working life an...
February 20, 2017 at 00:19
I have always found my work, "creative and interesting". But there are different kinds and levels of creativity and interest, and it cannot be expecte...
February 20, 2017 at 00:02
That book is actually on my shelves, I picked it up cheap somewhere I imagine, and yet I have never opened it. Since Spinoza and Hegel have one thing ...
February 19, 2017 at 23:24