You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

You could, as suggested, "ask a lot of questions", but you could not do anything with an experience like that, or the answers to your questions, unles...
June 08, 2017 at 23:14
(1) I had been talking about personailty in the sense of personhood, though; not in the sense of manifesting an active personailty. If function is los...
June 08, 2017 at 23:05
In: Causality  — view comment
IIn a causally closed, deterministic world there is no you making prior decisions; that also is a rationalization after the fact, or an illusory epiph...
June 08, 2017 at 22:46
It might be true that someone who is brain dead is simply gone from this world, and certainly will no longer be counted as a person if 'person' is def...
June 08, 2017 at 09:29
That's true if you are referring to the fact of belief and not to the content of beliefs, and I haven't suggested otherwise. I agree, as per above, th...
June 08, 2017 at 09:17
Great! You've succeeded in saying precisely nothing about what constitutes observable evidence of the existence of intentionality in people generally;...
June 08, 2017 at 09:05
I don't think it makes sense to say the person is diminished, its just their capabilities that are diminished. We still accord them the same degree of...
June 08, 2017 at 04:19
How exactly does human behavior display intentionality? Remember we are looking for something that is not merely an interpretation, but something dire...
June 08, 2017 at 04:16
I can see that there would be no good reason for you to assign anthropomorphic qualities to the world because for you good evidence would be empirical...
June 08, 2017 at 03:16
I made no claim about "most folks". I said that it's a matter of definition. If any of a person's beliefs contradict a central tenet of a religion, or...
June 08, 2017 at 01:45
My God...the rigor!
June 08, 2017 at 01:29
I agree that nothing Hume says entails mysticism, but I think andrewk's point was probably: that since, according to Hume, we can know only representa...
June 08, 2017 at 01:26
But, all you're saying is that the world doesn't manifest obvious person-hood in its parts. Most of the parts of our bodies do not, merely in themselv...
June 08, 2017 at 01:23
No, I'm not; it's a mere matter of definition. If you believe something that contradicts a central tenet of s religion, then you are simply not an adh...
June 08, 2017 at 01:17
They are deluding themselves if they think they are Buddhists (as opposed to people who merely accept some Buddhist tenets) and they also believe in G...
June 08, 2017 at 00:53
I only said it because it certainly didn't seem as though it was obvious to you that you were doing nothing more than trotting out an unsupported, fas...
June 08, 2017 at 00:48
Of course it is already obvious that it is correct in your opinion, so that unsupported comment seems redundant, and hence pointless.
June 08, 2017 at 00:20
Yeah, that's one explanation, and a very fashionable one indeed.
June 07, 2017 at 23:47
This just shows that you are ignorant about Buddhism. There are Buddhists who believe in gods. It is considered more fortunate in Buddhism to be born ...
June 07, 2017 at 23:41
Regarding Hume I think it would have been more apposite if you had written "limits within which there is nothing more to expect".
June 07, 2017 at 23:27
I say you merely repeated yourself, and didn't address anything I (and probably the others) wrote. :-}
June 07, 2017 at 23:16
Anglo survey, no? Perhaps Anglo/American at best.
June 07, 2017 at 23:09
In: Causality  — view comment
Sure there would be practical outcomes that result from praising and blaming behavior, just as there are from any behavior. In a deterministic world t...
June 07, 2017 at 22:33
Examples? I don't know what this means. No it does not mean an impossibility, and I stated that myself. K chose to pursue his genius, and he could hav...
June 07, 2017 at 02:39
How many well-documented cases of great, lasting loves can you cite? The practical day to day exigencies of living together and raising a family are n...
June 07, 2017 at 01:06
This is a very important point you make, and one that is often missed. My only question is: what could it mean for Jesus to be either real or not? Any...
June 07, 2017 at 00:45
You do.
June 06, 2017 at 23:55
I think that marrying Regine would have been a mistake, unless he was able to be wholehearted about it, which he obviously was not. What we imagine a ...
June 06, 2017 at 22:56
Yes, I don't agree that anyone should feel constrained by "normative oughts" in any case. Morality and ethics should be a matter of conscience and int...
June 06, 2017 at 22:51
Schopenhauer was able to avoid the necessity to work and still live pretty well by all accounts, due to a bursary from his father. So, he didn't reall...
June 06, 2017 at 22:43
Then it would alternatively be possible to say: 1. If order (laws of nature) do not exist, then God does not exist and anything is possible: that is, ...
June 06, 2017 at 22:08
I think you may well be right about that, at least for a significant number of cases. But I don't believe that such overweening self-belief is a guara...
June 06, 2017 at 12:29
Is there any difference between "transcending the ethical" and "being unethical'?
June 06, 2017 at 12:22
After reading the article you linked, I am inclined to think that K cancelled his engagement to Regine out of an apprehension that he could not both f...
June 06, 2017 at 12:08
In: Causality  — view comment
The logic of praise and blame entails that the person to be praised or blamed for some act or achievement is the unconstrained agent and origin of the...
June 06, 2017 at 11:53
Yes, although I wasn't referring to that kind of "hinge proposition" knowledge. I was concerned more with so-called empirical knowledge; specifically ...
June 06, 2017 at 01:06
Isn't it just the social instinct to be aligned with peers?
June 05, 2017 at 23:52
>:O
June 05, 2017 at 23:22
It depends on what you mean by 'know'. Does anybody ever really know anything in the empirical sphere (in the sense that it is absolutely impossible t...
June 05, 2017 at 23:21
'Smart-arse' or 'one-upman' Atheism?
June 05, 2017 at 23:03
I think this is an interesting question. Is the Christian God the only really personal God, due to His human incarnation? On the other hand, the Islam...
June 05, 2017 at 22:58
I haven't read much about this, so I can only speculate. Perhaps K was expecting to be able to reach a total commitment, and then realized he could no...
June 05, 2017 at 22:51
Regrettably I have to tootle off now Agustino, so, until later...
June 05, 2017 at 10:41
Unfortunately I have to stop now ND, but I will return to this conversation as soon as I am able.
June 05, 2017 at 10:39
Perhaps K was not prepared to be decisive for merely practical reasons; and was waiting until he could commit himself absolutely. Of course this waiti...
June 05, 2017 at 10:37
To be decisive is not necessarily, or perhaps even often, to be wholly committed in the sense I was meaning, though. Decisiveness is often driven mere...
June 05, 2017 at 10:32
"How we all see"; that is intersubjectivity. How I see, or how you see; that is subjectivity, or personailty. I agree with you that what is deeply per...
June 05, 2017 at 10:27
It probably would have been better if I had said "you suspect X is true but you really want to believe Y", since I don't believe we ever know when it ...
June 05, 2017 at 10:16
This sounds like the Buddhist or Hindu idea of going for satchitananda over transient worldly pleasure or merely comforting belief. How many, if any, ...
June 05, 2017 at 09:58
You say that 180 Proof is well known; I'm just saying that that fact does not guarantee that his thoughts were truly unique or of high value. To be ho...
June 05, 2017 at 09:50