You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

I'm not convinced that any of what you suggest would be possible, except maybe for the most rudimentary language. In any case the possibility cannot b...
February 22, 2019 at 00:28
What happens when you encounter a vehicle with numbers that add to a prime, and whose driver is not of Slav descent? What will you do? In other words,...
February 21, 2019 at 22:39
You can only follow a rule that involves criteria of which you were aware at the time of applying the rule I would say. If you knew that the numbers o...
February 21, 2019 at 08:08
I don't think you are addressing the same issue as I was. Imagine you wanted to create a new private language; how would you specify what the words of...
February 20, 2019 at 23:19
Try to imagine for a moment that for Nietzsche "criteria for correctness" were irrelevant. It's just like aesthetics where there can be no definitive ...
February 20, 2019 at 22:54
What exactly do you mean by "private rule" though? A rule that no one else could understand, or merely a rule that no one else does understand because...
February 20, 2019 at 22:43
If Nietzsche had his own set of rules to live by, and told no one what those rules were. then his set of rules would be understood only by himself. If...
February 20, 2019 at 08:21
I don't know why you would want to avoid talk about feeling. Compassion and empathy are fundamentally feelings no matter how conceptually elaborated t...
February 20, 2019 at 04:57
Firstly, mathematics is not reducible to logic (Whitehead and Russell tried that). Secondly, if you want to claim that mere logic tells us anything ab...
February 20, 2019 at 04:54
The way I see it a moral feeling at simplest would just be an un-selfconscious disposition to behave towards others in ways motivated by empathy or co...
February 20, 2019 at 04:45
Fundamentally just a moral feeling then, upon which explicit moral injunctions are based and elaborated?
February 20, 2019 at 04:28
:smile: As an aside: I think Hegel also rejects the notion of "moral rules". I seem to recall reading a passage in one of his works to the effect that...
February 20, 2019 at 01:54
I don't think Nietzsche can be read as endorsing any general set of moral rules. He certainly does have an aesthetic notion of something like "greatne...
February 20, 2019 at 01:37
I think Nietzsche would say that Joe should have a very good reason to kill Bill, and not act compulsively as a slave to passion, because such a dispo...
February 20, 2019 at 01:09
I can't see why someone could not have a moral rule for themselves that takes the general form of 'if X do Y'. I mean it would more accurately be expr...
February 20, 2019 at 01:04
Yes, and they just keep coming; when will the fun ever end? :rofl:
February 19, 2019 at 21:46
Firstly, I don't see why an individual could not have a private set of rules that governs their moral behavior. Although of course there are common ru...
February 19, 2019 at 21:42
I think it's a profound mistake to believe that logic alone can tell us anything about the way the world actually is.
February 19, 2019 at 21:29
So there is no morality beyond conceived morality? From which it would seem to follow that morality is subjective, since conception is exclusively an ...
February 19, 2019 at 05:05
I don't know...maybe a clusterfallacy? Or a clusterphallusy?
February 19, 2019 at 05:01
Holy Jesus To that I simply would say: "how do you know; you haven't been there"?
February 19, 2019 at 04:54
Fair point.
February 19, 2019 at 01:10
Only if you don't clusterfuck off!
February 19, 2019 at 00:49
I wasn't talking about identifying truths (or truth claims) in texts, but about discovering truths or insights in texts. The point is that you actuall...
February 19, 2019 at 00:42
So, you think a "small sign or impression" would be enough to signal to those with a competent grasp of the pitfalls and fallacies of thought that thi...
February 19, 2019 at 00:38
It cannot be both fallacious and true in its entirety. If it is mostly fallacious and yet contains a nugget of truth, then the nugget of truth should ...
February 19, 2019 at 00:34
@"fdrake" perhaps you are thinking of eurythmics or eurythmy?
February 19, 2019 at 00:30
I don't know about you, but I don't even have time to read everything I want to read, let alone spend time sifting through garbage hoping to uncover s...
February 19, 2019 at 00:17
This presupposes that the proposed additional guidelines would be so prominent, so overbearing, as to render everything else on the site more or less ...
February 19, 2019 at 00:12
I don't think Nietzsche accepted the validity of systems; where systems are understood to be universal, overarching. It doesn't follow from that that ...
February 19, 2019 at 00:09
By all means praise them for their insights if there are any. If someone produces a nest of fallacies, though, whatever insights may be there may only...
February 18, 2019 at 23:53
There may possibly be gems of insight hiding in nests of fallacy, but who would care to take the trouble to search for and unearth them? That's very k...
February 18, 2019 at 23:11
Sure, but I would say that "wrangling over fallacies" only occurs because some people don't understand or, even worse, obstinately refuse to accept, t...
February 18, 2019 at 23:00
You continue to conflate length with measurement. Is an anaconda longer than a maggot? Of course it is, and you don't need to measure them to see that...
February 18, 2019 at 22:11
Well thanks, @"S", I probably still have some philosophical sympathies that you would disagree with, but to me this is more an argument about form tha...
February 18, 2019 at 22:00
Yes, @"StreetlightX" does tend to universalize his own personal preferences.
February 18, 2019 at 21:53
I think Nietzsche was concerned with a "revaluation of all values" not a rejection of all values. I read Nietzsche as rejecting what he called "slave ...
February 18, 2019 at 21:50
If the fallacies were deliberately woven into the text I suppose it could be something interesting; a kind of novelty; but could it be philosophically...
February 18, 2019 at 21:38
Of course I knew you are right, technically speaking. But I am arguing that 'sound' means 'true' in the sense that a straight board or an arrow can be...
February 18, 2019 at 21:36
I voted 'agree' to the OP, because despite protestations that it would take up precious space; I can't see how it could take up more precious space th...
February 18, 2019 at 21:30
So something could be philosophically interesting, even if it were riddled with fallacies? :confused:
February 18, 2019 at 21:25
@"Harry Hindu" is correct and @"unenlightened" is incorrect here. To be sound (which means true) an argument must have both true premises and a conclu...
February 18, 2019 at 21:19
If what you claim were true, then we could not be wrong in any of our measurements. The fact that multiple measurements can be taken completely indepe...
February 18, 2019 at 04:30
I'm with @"S" here, because I can't see any sense in the idea that the objective/ subjective distinction "fails". As I see it, in the moral context th...
February 17, 2019 at 22:51
I wouldn't hold my breath when it comes to MU. :grin:
February 17, 2019 at 21:57
This is not correct. A thing has length if it is measurable, it is measurable if it has length. It need not be measured to have length, In fact it mus...
February 17, 2019 at 21:53
Yeah, it's a consequence of your transmission failing to engage.
February 17, 2019 at 02:55
The open question argument as I remember and understand is a purported refutation of the idea that moral goodness could be identical with any non-mora...
February 17, 2019 at 01:26
I don't agree that it shows any such thing. All it asserts is that good is something indefinable. Even if we were to accept that good is indefinable, ...
February 17, 2019 at 01:07
You're missing the point here. The point is that the fundamentals are the So, almost everyone believes that social harmony is good; but people may obv...
February 17, 2019 at 00:34