You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

It doesn't seem tendentious to me at all. There is no doubt that the idea of a hierarchy of being has been used to justify human exploitation of the n...
October 13, 2019 at 00:14
Here is a nice summation I came across concerning the detrimental effect of the idea of "The Great Chain of Being" and the inevitable belief in human ...
October 12, 2019 at 23:28
The irony! :rofl:
October 12, 2019 at 23:04
This is right. Worship establishes the existence of God for the worshipers. I think that much cannot be argued against.
October 12, 2019 at 23:02
And your point?
October 12, 2019 at 23:00
I doubt Dennett would be stupid enough to deny there are subconscious mental processes (or brain processes if you prefer). Do you claim to be aware of...
October 12, 2019 at 22:58
Capitalistic thinking, as it has evolved historically, is attributable to a whole range of conditions, not least of which has been the discovery and e...
October 12, 2019 at 05:34
If you say that is the extent of god's existence, I can find no disagreement. :grin:
October 12, 2019 at 04:41
It's not a matter of believing anything but of recognizing what is the most effective way to live harmoniously and happily with community. So, if huma...
October 12, 2019 at 04:32
:strong: :rofl: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KEnsRTfIKzc/hqdefault.jpg https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KEnsRTfIKzc/hqdefault.jpg
October 12, 2019 at 04:20
The subject has compelling evidence for the existence of an experience that s/he conceptualizes as 'seeing god". Alternatively s/he could conceptualiz...
October 11, 2019 at 23:10
If a complex system such as the Universe were to be intentionally planned, then the mind that planned it would need to be at least as complex.
October 11, 2019 at 22:54
You're talking about a feeling, and I can relate to that. But no feeling entails the existence or reality of anything in particular (other than the on...
October 11, 2019 at 22:19
Do theists understand what it is they think exists?
October 11, 2019 at 21:59
Not quite what I had in mind but that works, too! Yeah, nice! :grin:
October 11, 2019 at 21:40
Yes, it seems reasonable to say there are different ways of being or existence, but not radically different kinds of being or existence. The idea of a...
October 11, 2019 at 04:15
I agree that mystical experiences, and other kinds, communal, aesthetic and ceremonial, for example, can be religious motivators, but I would not coun...
October 11, 2019 at 03:56
Neither Maslow, nor James endorse any particular religion; and James at least (whose work I am most familiar with) does not count mystical experience ...
October 11, 2019 at 03:51
That seems irrelevant. Are there any who don't?
October 11, 2019 at 01:34
I have had quite a few what I would count as mystical or religious experiences, and yet I am not religious, because I don't interpret those experience...
October 11, 2019 at 01:17
Ah, but you're forgetting the distinction between being real and existing! :lol: Say I'm bald and my hair is nonetheless real (and it's blonde :joke: ...
October 11, 2019 at 00:01
:cool:
October 10, 2019 at 23:52
Multiple factors have gone into the decline of the nuclear family and the increasing lack of desire to marry. The problem with religion is that it is ...
October 10, 2019 at 23:52
Did I say it's a "totally new thing"? Of course it's never been a good idea. But then being ruled by crusty old farts isn't a good idea either; seems ...
October 10, 2019 at 21:55
I agree with what I think you are saying there: the gazelle senses danger just as we do, and responds instinctively rather than rationally. My point a...
October 10, 2019 at 20:50
Of course that's true, and it is what I meant, but I spoke ambiguously: as though there might have been a prize to be won and no one had won it rather...
October 10, 2019 at 05:39
The totality of the physical world or domain just is usually defined as the Universe Even if there were another separate "ideal" domain (and how would...
October 10, 2019 at 05:33
How could that ever be tested? What could it even mean to say that the physical world is not physical? It is physical by definition. Are there measura...
October 10, 2019 at 03:14
Gazelles are constantly wary of danger. I would say that the gazelle that sees no danger where there is danger has a false picture. I acknowledge that...
October 10, 2019 at 03:10
What you say makes sense to me. I'm partial to Sanders myself.
October 10, 2019 at 02:57
I was responding to "Being true does not (require language)" and agreeing with that. As I said I think a human being without language or an animal cou...
October 10, 2019 at 02:21
Sanders is just five years older than Trump. Should Sanders be dismissed as potential candidate just because he had a heart attack?
October 10, 2019 at 01:04
Yes, you could have a true or false picture of things without language.
October 10, 2019 at 01:01
We do until we are asked to say what it is.
October 10, 2019 at 00:59
It would be hard to definitely demonstrate, but I think it is arguable that our present age of consumerism, entertainment media and mortgage slavery c...
October 10, 2019 at 00:54
Yeah, no one's ever won a Nobel prize for philosophy either!
October 10, 2019 at 00:33
Indeed! If things continue on the current course, the whole of the Third World will likely be thrown under the bus to preserve our precious lifestyles...
October 10, 2019 at 00:25
We don't need to bother about it unless we want to try to analyze what makes propositions true and false, or explore the ways in which we are able to ...
October 10, 2019 at 00:10
I knew I could count on you for some serious discussion.
October 10, 2019 at 00:06
The fate of the world in the hands of the enraged inexperienced? What a terrifying prospect! I suppose in the long run the collapse of civilization as...
October 09, 2019 at 23:53
The two notions are related and the OP is explicitly about the "power of truth", which truth as the merely formal property of propositions on its own ...
October 09, 2019 at 23:45
So, all terms have only one sense for you? What a strangely limited viewpoint!
October 09, 2019 at 23:29
I see no need for confusion. It's not that difficult. They are simply different ways of thinking about truth; and they don't need to be "compatible"; ...
October 09, 2019 at 23:20
What more does the T-sentence tell or show us in your opinion? As I've said repeatedly I'm not claiming we can do any more than unravel the logic inhe...
October 09, 2019 at 23:17
What do you mean? I thought we are here to discuss all senses of the term, not merely the notion of propositional truth. The OP is concerned with the ...
October 09, 2019 at 23:13
It's just a broader notion of truth, akin to Heidegger's "truth as unconcealement" or "alethia". Of course if you think narrowly that truth is only a ...
October 09, 2019 at 23:03
I would say that actuality is what makes statements true or false, and I'm still not seeing how that is out of sync with the "conventional" understand...
October 09, 2019 at 22:58
I kind of agree with that. I think truth is more of a general notion than a clear concept with clear facets. And I think the inherent logic(s) in the ...
October 09, 2019 at 22:53
Are you referring to the "iff"? If so, I would respond that the correspondence theory also affirms that statements are true iff they correspond to act...
October 09, 2019 at 22:41
The point is that the intuition is all you're going to get. All accounts rely on intuition, it's not the other way around. For example how would you k...
October 09, 2019 at 22:36