You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

The second is a strange statement,considering that science is not a matter of faith at all, but of provisional hypotheses. The idea behind science is ...
December 05, 2021 at 23:37
:up: Local negentropic processes "steal" order at the expense of increasing global entropy.
December 05, 2021 at 23:32
The problem is that logic alone cannot determine plausibility only validity, and what you would count as constituting evidence, in anything beyond sim...
December 05, 2021 at 23:28
You said I pointed out that experienced properties of the object are not imposed by us (that is, are not subjectively imposed), then you cited the gen...
December 05, 2021 at 23:21
Perhaps Kant's tiny repertoire of jokes was the cause of the stereotypical notion of German humour.
December 05, 2021 at 22:55
Unless the claim is that the self-in-itself is part of the noumenal. :wink: But.... if the noumenal cannot have parts, then the self-in-itself must be...
December 05, 2021 at 22:51
Those are also imposed on us though, aren't they?
December 05, 2021 at 22:50
We do not impose those properties; they are imposed upon us, like it or not.
December 05, 2021 at 22:35
Apart from representational models another simple way of framing perception is saying that we see objects as they are revealed to us via reflected lig...
December 05, 2021 at 22:18
Can't read it, sorry...not bad calligraphy, though... :wink: This is more legible https://i.pinimg.com/originals/1a/0c/f0/1a0cf0be9b8ab17692a35d8598ba...
December 05, 2021 at 21:20
Consider this from Beyond Good And Evil, (Gutenberg edition, translated by Helen Zimmern) Chapter 1, section 9 sourced from here You desire to LIVE “a...
December 05, 2021 at 21:14
Mu-tha?
December 05, 2021 at 21:01
Fair enough, but if you look back I think you'll find that it has been predominantly you initiating these conversations by responding to posts I've ma...
December 05, 2021 at 21:00
Is it so obvious, though? This is one way of thinking about the situation, to be sure, but is it the best way? To imagine is to represent, to make a p...
December 05, 2021 at 20:45
"Hap-piness is a warm gun"?. :wink:
December 05, 2021 at 20:31
Not merely sitting, but sitting in a certain way; nothing to do with chickens. This is not according to me, but according to Soto Zen. On the other ha...
December 05, 2021 at 20:27
It's an image of the "famous solo cup". not the famous solo cup itself (if such a thing exists apart from images). One image on your computer and one ...
December 05, 2021 at 04:40
Did you mean "not allowing..."? Regardless of what the self is, would Nietzsche not agree that you must follow your own passion and not live according...
December 05, 2021 at 04:33
You can live more or less enslaved to what you might think are the expectations of others.
December 05, 2021 at 02:06
Surely Nietzsche would have said that "being who you really are" is preferable to not being who you really are. It seem to me this is where the existe...
December 05, 2021 at 02:05
The secular view is default because it is the view that grounds ethics in nothing more than arguments that may be derived from empirical and rational ...
December 05, 2021 at 01:57
What's wrong with being cruel to animals if we don't think it is because they have a right not to be treated cruelly? What about children who are not ...
December 05, 2021 at 01:33
How do you interpret Kant's notion of the 'thing in itself'; is it. for him, unknowable or merely not exhaustively knowable?
December 05, 2021 at 00:53
You don't understand it as an idea of flourishing, but simply of change, whether for the better or worse?
December 05, 2021 at 00:38
My apologies if I offended you by my straight talking. Do you want to say that philosophical pragmatists acknowledge unknowable things in themselves o...
December 05, 2021 at 00:35
I think this is on the right track. Nietzsche conceived of the fundamental aim of all life to be, not merely survival, but power; by which I take him ...
December 05, 2021 at 00:06
This is a weak argument: F=ma cannot be understood simply by virtue of understanding English. Do you read Pali? If not I presume you read the Pali Can...
December 04, 2021 at 23:26
And...?
December 04, 2021 at 23:01
I knew you'd say that. :wink:
December 04, 2021 at 06:36
But then the unpredictable is expected, so to be truly unpredictable the madman should sometimes be predictable, because that would be unexpected.
December 04, 2021 at 06:21
It's the term used by Buddhists. Whether complete non-attachment is possible to cultivate is a question I can't answer, since I haven't done it. I do ...
December 04, 2021 at 06:09
Your apparent puzzlement is amusing.You think everything is black and white: either no attachment at all or complete attachment? No diversity of attac...
December 04, 2021 at 01:58
I simply mean that we don't consciously experience dopamine, just as we don't consciously experience neural networks. Not on the experiential level.
December 04, 2021 at 01:31
Pragmatism does not accept any notion of unknowable things in themselves. You apparently don't know what you're talking about.
December 03, 2021 at 23:20
Still deflecting? The question was how do we know that things in themselves are unknowable if we are basing that supposed knowledge on a story that as...
December 03, 2021 at 23:15
Nice bit of deflection. I'm already familiar enough with the literature thanks.
December 03, 2021 at 23:11
I'd forgotten about that essay; I encountered it as an undergraduate: looks like radical independence of spirit begins with Kant. Keeping the flame al...
December 03, 2021 at 23:10
If we are modeling the world then there must be a world that is being modeled, no? Or perhaps you are wanting to say the world is a model? Whose model...
December 03, 2021 at 22:43
Right, I have no argument with dopamine being a part of the story, and only a part, even in the biological, neurological context. From the experientia...
December 03, 2021 at 21:53
LOL, yes I remember that one too. It always reminds me of when I used to be interested in kabbala, and I remember reading that Hebrew letters each hav...
December 03, 2021 at 21:17
Que?
December 03, 2021 at 21:03
I haven't read the dopamine book; I am prejudicially suspicious of any attempt to explain complex human motivations and behavior in terms of the effec...
December 03, 2021 at 21:03
I think you can find similar ideas to enlightenment-as-non-attachment in Spinoza, the Epicureans, the Skeptics, the Stoics and the Existentialists. Ni...
December 03, 2021 at 20:46
I don't know; I'm not sure a non-attached person would experience disappointment.
December 03, 2021 at 06:16
That seems true, although I would say the cultural stuff is most important, and although it is obviously absorbed via the senses, it is not mere sense...
December 03, 2021 at 06:14
For me there are different kinds of beauty. There is moral beauty for example. A saint would be morally beautiful. To admire something would be to lov...
December 03, 2021 at 05:57
I don't know. Imagine if there could be a person who was blind, had no feeling in their body, no senses whatever; could they have a mind? I really don...
December 03, 2021 at 05:55
Why could you not? You might, although non-attached, find one tree more beautiful than another, no? Surely a saintly person would be more loveable tha...
December 03, 2021 at 05:48
From what I have read of people being in sensory deprivation chambers, I doubt anyone would last that long. Instead they might become psychotic, but t...
December 03, 2021 at 05:44
Is it necessary that to feel something, pain, love, grief, happiness or whatever, that I be attached to the feeling? What does it mean to say I am att...
December 03, 2021 at 05:37