You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Srap Tasmaner

Comments

Then your beef is with really simplistic sociobiology, right? Humans respond to the Beatles as they do because 200,000 years ago... Eh. Everyone knows...
October 17, 2020 at 18:13
My understanding as well. It's been my impression that there is a long-running debate about what exactly is selected in natural selection, a healthy d...
October 17, 2020 at 17:53
Are you talking about change within our species, rather than its emergence?
October 17, 2020 at 17:19
I'm reserving judgment. "Gene-juggling" doesn't look all that good to me -- but I've not finished reading it. It's early, for all involved. For instan...
October 17, 2020 at 15:04
The appeal of edges and corners is that some of the directions you might go in are not available, so your search space is reduced -- or, rather, is re...
October 17, 2020 at 02:55
She looks terribly interesting, so thanks.
October 16, 2020 at 22:51
There's a lot going on between most decisions and the consequences of those decisions. I think we all shoot ourselves in the foot, but some of us are ...
October 16, 2020 at 14:38
No. But "result" is a weasel-word, isn't it? Being born is a necessary condition of being alive; being alive is a necessary condition of suffering; th...
October 16, 2020 at 14:25
Okay. In one sense, that's just obvious, and in another it's ridiculous. If I don't deliberately crush my hand with a 2-pound sledgehammer, then my ha...
October 16, 2020 at 06:37
Then why bring it up? Is someone claiming that the pain and distress of being born is justified because the fetus chose to be born?
October 16, 2020 at 02:20
In: Platonism  — view comment
My argument was precisely that I can happily say "Joe is thinking the same thing as Allison" if Joe is thinking it's going to rain and so is Allison, ...
October 16, 2020 at 01:10
Did I freely choose to be born?
October 15, 2020 at 22:56
I took the "common sense" understanding of whether some particular suffering is justified to be the difference between "I brought this on myself (it's...
October 15, 2020 at 21:47
But why should I not feel responsible for this poor decision just because it's a certainty that some of the decisions I make in my life will be poor o...
October 15, 2020 at 18:52
Understanding an utterance in a language you know is not a voluntary action. You don't get the meaning through a conscious and laborious process somet...
October 15, 2020 at 02:35
Or pieces we don't yet know how to connect, that have no affordance in the work in progress. You can set those aside until their place is revealed, or...
October 13, 2020 at 18:54
I think rather that how a language is learned, and that it may be learned, is the source of the habit of taking people at their word, but itself is no...
October 13, 2020 at 18:08
I only want to say that you don't need a reason to take someone at their word. This is some kind of default, and all the theorists I mentioned, Davids...
October 13, 2020 at 15:05
You don't see anything systematic in English phonology, morphology or syntax? Also: might want to rethink your concept of "habit". Putting on your sli...
October 13, 2020 at 13:44
In: Platonism  — view comment
Because a referring expression doesn't always refer. Displacement is a core feature of language, but if you have the tools to create an expression tha...
October 13, 2020 at 13:35
The connection between storm clouds and rain is not mental.
October 13, 2020 at 04:53
Not by me. I only said we need to be careful, because there are problems in this domain distinguishing algorithm from implementation. But clearly a wh...
October 13, 2020 at 03:05
Something in this neighborhood happens, however we characterize it. There are differences among Davidson's account (charity) and Grice's (cooperation)...
October 13, 2020 at 01:42
Another example, slightly different, is the "falling beams story" from The Maltese Falcon: Sam Spade tells the story of a time he was hired to find a ...
October 12, 2020 at 18:02
Always loved that bit! (And his many appearances on QI.)
October 12, 2020 at 17:52
For each of the believers in the two stories, there seems to have been a prior state in which there was an inferential structure: The pictures on a tv...
October 12, 2020 at 17:04
In: Platonism  — view comment
Let's suppose you're right, and there are Properties and concrete particulars are instances of them. There is Wrenchhood, and there is the concrete pa...
October 11, 2020 at 18:23
You might find this article interesting.
October 11, 2020 at 17:51
No, I mean is there a procedure to maximize agreement -- as an abstract goal, sure, whatever -- but is it conceivable that an interpreter has at his d...
October 11, 2020 at 03:08
Here's another attempt. If we're going to do truth conditional semantics, we recognize we're talking about reasoning. Davidson's principle of charity,...
October 11, 2020 at 01:47
And related. Basically all the approaches inspired by Carnap and Tarski. I don't know if there is any experimental evidence at all for the whole model...
October 10, 2020 at 22:43
That's possible. In a little while I might not endorse what I just wrote. I'm uncomfortable with this whole approach to semantics, so I keep finding n...
October 10, 2020 at 19:04
I'm saying Davidson chooses, as is his right under the Treaty of Abstraction, to ignore the processes that solve the problem of defective utterance, w...
October 10, 2020 at 18:26
@"Banno" I don't think I've ever really directly tackled how an interpreter should handle an utterance like (1) Sure, if I reprehend any thing in this...
October 10, 2020 at 15:56
I was being picturesque.
October 10, 2020 at 14:14
is picturesque. Why are you pestering this thread when there's a perfectly good Platonist to argue with in another thread? Why should I have to deal w...
October 10, 2020 at 13:10
In: Platonism  — view comment
No. If I don't take predicates as Properties that have independent existence, I don't have to take vacuous predicates as Properties that themselves ha...
October 10, 2020 at 13:01
Exactly. Anyway, proved my point. You called reference a fantasy; implication of choosing a word like that is usually that this should influence what ...
October 10, 2020 at 11:46
What's the intended force of this though? Are you distinguishing reference from something we do with language that is not a fantasy? If you are, what'...
October 10, 2020 at 00:01
In: Books  — view comment
There is no evidence this is something I can manage. I read much less than I'd like, but in practice what that really means is that I read and don't r...
October 09, 2020 at 19:36
In: Platonism  — view comment
If this translation system works so well, I can just as well translate your Platonish into something else, like regular English. From the beginning I'...
October 09, 2020 at 01:58
Or you could say, as LW might in different words, that it's the context in which you state that leads people to treat your statement as an assertion; ...
October 09, 2020 at 01:06
Yeah. It's already obvious that kids are generalizing. ("I breaked it." Or Google the wug experiment if you don't know it.) Chomsky's idea was that if...
October 08, 2020 at 23:40
I dunno. The way we all encountered that sentence, not just in the context of philosophical discussion, but even set off specially by itself as an exa...
October 08, 2020 at 23:00
Just to gesture back at the context of this paper again... Chomsky somewhere said his entire life's work is organized around two problems: 1. Plato's ...
October 08, 2020 at 22:47
I'm just thinking we need to be careful here, and that phrase might have been conflating three different things. There's no reason to avoid talking in...
October 08, 2020 at 21:39
That looks like an infelicitous phrase to me. Algorithm is very high-level, perhaps as high as you can get before purpose. Below there's implementatio...
October 08, 2020 at 21:06
That occurred to me, but there's also the "assigning a new role to 'epitaph'" at the end of the passage. (Just for jollies, I emailed Lepore yesterday...
October 08, 2020 at 18:41
October 08, 2020 at 15:45
It's just shoptalk. "Theory of meaning for a language" is just Davidson-speak for a semantics for that language. Not expected to be something you're a...
October 08, 2020 at 04:45