You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Srap Tasmaner

Comments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxIG2msJ7ow
October 30, 2020 at 04:14
As the subject, this is my tendency to be capable of reporting -- but not just on any mental activity, on my mental activity. I'm wondering if there a...
October 29, 2020 at 14:10
I think that's a nice question, but not necessarily one that has an answer, and thinking it has to be answerable is probably a mistake. Philosophy is ...
October 27, 2020 at 16:38
This is the sort of thing I think is ripe for philosophical analysis, though "analysis" is a lousy word there. I even started a thread on a related ph...
October 26, 2020 at 18:32
The presuppositions of moral claims, viz. the existence of human beings interacting with each other. Maybe that you state it as if the two are unrelat...
October 26, 2020 at 04:08
You might be assuming that but I'm not. I thought your idea of their being two different rates of change was spot on, and very close to what others ha...
October 26, 2020 at 01:27
No, I'm just saying a prescriptive claim that would, if followed, lead to the presuppositions of moral claims being unfulfilled and unfulfillable cann...
October 25, 2020 at 23:03
Here's a "moral theory": Thou shalt not have children, but if there be no people then do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.
October 25, 2020 at 22:45
Morality is premised on people existing, presupposes them as the cards to be sorted are presupposed in asking for them to be sorted. There are no mora...
October 25, 2020 at 22:06
But you don't end up with a sorted deck, which was the whole point. You've redefined the goal, and maybe the way you redefined it almost works, maybe ...
October 25, 2020 at 21:39
Suppose you're supposed to figure out how to sort a bunch of playing cards; the answer you come up with is throwing all the cards away, on the grounds...
October 25, 2020 at 19:50
Yeah. That is not a possible result for a "moral argument" if there is such a thing. Morality is for people dealing with each other; if you've got an ...
October 25, 2020 at 19:02
Are you under the impression I'm defending the existence of the abstract object "set of all persons" rather than the existence of the individual membe...
October 25, 2020 at 18:33
The paradox is immediate: the only way to make sure others are treated as they should be is to make sure there are no people at all. (As I said a very...
October 25, 2020 at 17:36
Many of us believe there is a pretty straightforward story that starts at kinship, which natural selection takes an interest in, to the great variety ...
October 25, 2020 at 16:48
And I claim that the substance of morality is how we must treat each other if we're going to live together in social groups, and nothing else. I don't...
October 25, 2020 at 14:49
How are we to understand this? If it's an element of the social contract, then other parties to the contract have a corresponding duty not to harm you...
October 25, 2020 at 14:36
I can't say I really understood your suggestion, maybe because this mostly isn't my thing. I could understand what the confusion you describe would me...
October 25, 2020 at 01:36
Well, watching public hearings where elected officials clearly have no idea what the tech people they're talking to are really up to -- not encouragin...
October 25, 2020 at 00:17
But I am very far from dismissing your worries. Oppenheimer is heroic precisely because he was rare. But after Oppenheimer, it's pretty hard to hide b...
October 24, 2020 at 23:34
Hrmmmm. That doesn't seem like a particularly good analogy here. I mean, almost everyone seems to think they have something like a direct experience o...
October 24, 2020 at 23:14
WTF? Is that anything like what I said in the post as a whole? I thought you brought up a really interesting issue; I pointed out that others have not...
October 24, 2020 at 22:55
Well I can say that your paradox had the sort of result I always hope for: gave me an opportunity to think through my ethical intuitions and understan...
October 24, 2020 at 18:19
Not alien, no, and not unheard of, but I still think the Kantian approach is wrongheaded. But to me this is clearly a mistake -- it's just a case of t...
October 24, 2020 at 15:06
Oppenheimer. For AI: Yudkowsky and Bostrom spring to mind. For genetic engineering: like, everyone, it's been part of the discussion all along. This i...
October 24, 2020 at 14:33
Well spotted -- but I wouldn't say he was confused, just wrongheaded. He had the example of Hume right in front of him, but was unable to follow it be...
October 24, 2020 at 14:05
Insofar as a club or a voluntary association relies on morality to be possible, that's indirect: to be a member of the club, you have to be a member o...
October 24, 2020 at 06:27
This is my argument all stripped down: Morality is social. Always has been. The whole point of morality is to make social groups sustainable. An idea ...
October 24, 2020 at 05:00
I don't think Dennett is defending something rather like "we think we're thinking but we're not". It would appear to be the philosophical theory that'...
October 24, 2020 at 00:07
This is fascinating. You do leave out exactly what's in your post, and which could show up in more restricted domains, which is precisely the knowledg...
October 23, 2020 at 19:05
In: Platonism  — view comment
Science, if it's going to offer explanations, needs something to explain. Our everyday understanding of things is a starting point; our sophisticated ...
October 23, 2020 at 18:39
I thought I was answering a version of "no", but mainly pointing out that his question was based on a misunderstanding of the difference between "I br...
October 23, 2020 at 15:27
In a sense, actually, yes, but not in the sense you think, because you're also confused about philosophy. Are there genuine moral questions? Questions...
October 23, 2020 at 15:23
This is actually your problem, right here. Anti-natalism is not a moral position at all. It is, as I said before, a logical paradox. It might also wor...
October 23, 2020 at 08:34
In: Platonism  — view comment
See there you go. Your post is a mix of cognitive psychology (Chomsky) and evolution and Kant and empiricism. And it's a bad mix. "Kant because that's...
October 22, 2020 at 17:58
Suppose while I was at the store you finished building a model of the Eiffel Tower out of popsicle sticks, and left it sitting on the kitchen table so...
October 22, 2020 at 17:33
It's pretty clear I don't believe it drifted anywhere. I know. I quoted you. What is your claim anyway? You must consider parents responsible for some...
October 22, 2020 at 02:20
I'm afraid my comment is not based in Kant, but what if this is just false? Or, rather, what if it is false given a disambiguation of the word "percep...
October 21, 2020 at 21:14
In: Bannings  — view comment
Less than a day. I thought of pointing out to him that this is not a social media platform and that responding with a meme is not a good idea here, bu...
October 21, 2020 at 19:40
I'm not sure there's any grounds for making "facts" the exclusive province of rationalization. Even if the reasons we give for a decision are generall...
October 21, 2020 at 19:31
In: Platonism  — view comment
I'll take this as a synecdoche for the whole post. This is not a problem I can solve but I'll tell you roughly why I think you're wrong. This is the w...
October 21, 2020 at 19:11
There is only one thread. The manyness of threads is an illusion created by the PlushForums software.
October 21, 2020 at 18:34
It's actually a very curious experience going over things like fractions and exponents with someone who has a very rich conceptual apparatus -- he's a...
October 21, 2020 at 18:32
If you thought Ray was only holding up the VGPS to ridicule, you could not have more totally missed the point of that record. I take umbrage, sir! On ...
October 21, 2020 at 18:14
The only classrooms my children have ever been in were part of "co-op" programs -- homeschooling parents who form groups to have something like school...
October 21, 2020 at 16:34
Yes thanks but I already know who Richard Dawkins is. What I didn't know, and am frankly gobsmacked to learn, is that Mary Midgley attacked Dawkins ba...
October 21, 2020 at 16:14
That all sounds fine, and pretty typical for how science, ahem, evolves, particularly the Portin quote: What I don't see is 1. Any evidence that Dawki...
October 21, 2020 at 16:04
Completely agree! My youngest son even learned how to read with no formal instruction at all. Meaning, we never worked on reading as a separate thing ...
October 21, 2020 at 09:17