You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Srap Tasmaner

Comments

But you‘re asking, “How I can know where I am?” aren’t you? And that’s another thing entirely. So far we have: (1) Where is everything? (1a*) Where is...
November 14, 2021 at 18:25
The question itself is “Where is the universe?” and so fails because it’s like asking “Where is everything?” or “Where is everywhere?” and neither of ...
November 14, 2021 at 17:16
I had forgotten about Olber’s paradox, so thanks for that. I like this question very much, even though it’s clearly incoherent. You could read up on c...
November 14, 2021 at 16:12
That sounds like you’re invoking the ‘rule’ against explaining something in terms of itself — not so much a rule as a definition of failure — but you’...
November 12, 2021 at 20:09
Because he said it himself, in “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, and when asked about it over the years, he shrugged a lot. I think he was kind of drawn to ...
November 12, 2021 at 16:42
You can defend the existence of the state without accepting some libertarian’s equating of the state with socialism. You can also defend socialism, bu...
November 11, 2021 at 20:02
I don’t think you did, at least not here. I think it is true that the state can guarantee your ability to advocate for there being no state, among oth...
November 11, 2021 at 18:21
Really? When FEMA shows up and gives you a trailer to live in because your house was destroyed by a hurricane, that looks a lot like help.
November 11, 2021 at 18:16
This ‘genealogical’ critique specifically doesn’t speak to whether libertarianism is a sound political philosophy. If you could show that the ideas of...
November 11, 2021 at 17:52
Which goes to my point that we often distinguish — and need to distinguish, for conversations to make any sense — the literal, conventional meaning of...
November 08, 2021 at 01:38
I'll grant you can get that out of §246. But there's a couple peculiarities to that remark I'd like to ask about. One is that Wittgenstein suggests th...
November 08, 2021 at 00:53
Yes, I wasn't explicit about it, but I meant to imply that when I said I saw this as reinforcing your sense, if this is the right way to put it, that ...
November 06, 2021 at 05:10
I think it's a good question, but so long as we're speaking very broadly, I'd be tempted to distinguish roughly between before and after Darwin. Newto...
November 05, 2021 at 21:22
Alright, so imagine I claim I can play the tuba, but there's not one handy to *prove* it. (Have to come back to this.) Suppose someone else says, "No ...
November 05, 2021 at 17:18
Right. The standard Grice 101 examples are nearby: I ask if you want to stop here to eat and you say, looking at your phone, it's more than two hours ...
November 04, 2021 at 16:03
I meant it just in the sense of 'has a meaning', 'can be understood', and, for these cases of indicative sentences, 'can be assigned a truth-value'. O...
November 04, 2021 at 15:04
No, it doesn't, and I'm not wedded to the "necessarily true" bit. I'm not sure how else to characterize sentences that we seem unable or unwilling or ...
November 04, 2021 at 06:06
Consider saying "2 + 2 = 5". Is that meaningless, is it utterly unclear what someone would mean if they were to say this, or is it just false? Or cons...
November 04, 2021 at 06:00
As I understand the usual take on LW, if a sentence has a use, if it's useful, if it's a valid move in a language-game, then it's meaningful, because ...
November 04, 2021 at 02:48
Right. If you can sensibly say one, you ought to be able sensibly to say the other. Negation also comes up here: if you can sensibly say you know you ...
November 04, 2021 at 01:33
It's not like Wittgenstein had nothing to say about meaning, and he's widely read as endorsing a kind of functionalism: the meaning of a word, perhaps...
November 04, 2021 at 00:54
Was it meaningless when originally said here a few pages back? Looking in your wallet is how we would verify that you have $5; how would we verify tha...
November 04, 2021 at 00:05
Except it is a specific claim that you should not have children, isn't it? That to do so would be wrong, would be blameworthy. Benatar does not just s...
November 03, 2021 at 16:33
I think there's some room for debate there, but let's say you're right about all of that. What I'm more interested in at the moment is this sort of cl...
November 03, 2021 at 16:23
That's roughly my instinct, that theology is a motor spinning alright but not hooked up to a drivetrain; I just don't really trust that instinct. Thin...
November 03, 2021 at 05:11
That sounds reasonable, but leaves me wondering why you might think religions and theologies, which @"Janus" had asked about, aren't language-games. W...
November 03, 2021 at 02:54
Or 'I remembered my own name again,' when filling out a form. Grant that it is pointless to say, 'i know I have a headache'; is there also something w...
November 03, 2021 at 02:09
I'll just say again that, it seems to me unlikely that Wittgenstein had the same understanding of "language-game" as someone inclined to ask, 'Is such...
November 02, 2021 at 23:45
Oof. I hope we can aim a little higher than that. Maybe, for comparison, something more like this: You can speak plainly and simply without thereby si...
November 02, 2021 at 22:19
It's a start. There's little point in speaking Russian to me, for instance. And you need to be mindful of what your audience is likely to know and not...
November 02, 2021 at 21:14
I think I would include in 'common sense' the precept that an utterance ought to be understood as it was intended and not some other way. On the other...
November 02, 2021 at 20:24
The word "its" there is odd, though, isn't it? Why isn't it, "our ordinary criteria"? I'm not convinced by this "clinging" image, or by pointing the f...
November 02, 2021 at 18:47
I think so, yes. If there's uncertainty or confusion, explanations will have to be made, and those will have to come to ground somewhere. There is, it...
November 02, 2021 at 17:16
In: Bannings  — view comment
Wikipedia is your friend: Yes. Either can destroy a community we intend to preserve.
November 02, 2021 at 16:10
In: Bannings  — view comment
But it can still get you banned.
November 02, 2021 at 15:53
But is it a problem with Wittgenstein or with this way of reading him?
November 02, 2021 at 15:29
Wearing my 'moral sentiments' hat, I would add that doing good for another or preventing harm to them gives rise to a feeling that you have done good....
November 02, 2021 at 15:15
In: Bannings  — view comment
Flaming is insulting someone in an online discussion, and is much older than social media. As practiced here, I consider it an attempt at bullying rat...
November 02, 2021 at 14:40
If I'm robbed at gunpoint and pistol-whipped, I feel wronged by the guy that did it but I don't feel wronged by my parents. My parents will sympathize...
November 02, 2021 at 05:22
In: Bannings  — view comment
So far as I know, everyone banned in the last few days was Marco.
November 01, 2021 at 21:54
Why is context the point of debate here? What does the context in which @"TheMadFool" made the statement 'add' in this case? You agree with TMF that w...
November 01, 2021 at 15:13
Would you care to elaborate?
October 31, 2021 at 23:03
I get that. To you it's like answering "Why didn't you do the dishes?" with "Why are you trying to make me feel bad?" You see it as a rhetorical move ...
October 31, 2021 at 21:36
I claim that we can and do have a well-founded expectation that a person whose life we start will wish for their life to continue and they will, insof...
October 31, 2021 at 18:55
(1) Why do the sensations of futurity and pastness become less and more intense in God? Why does their intensity change? Is it so because this just is...
October 31, 2021 at 03:19
Or before! John Cook Wilson said, back in the previous twenties, that to him the phrase "theory of knowledge" looked like a fallacy.
October 30, 2021 at 20:48
But it's a little more complicated than that. Was it said as a philosophical conclusion, or as an example of the sort of thing someone might say, when...
October 30, 2021 at 19:59
"Everyone else", a phrase that here means "about 100 billion human beings."
October 30, 2021 at 16:39
There's an old story about the committee deciding what to put on Voyager to represent mankind, and a mathematician said, "We could send some Bach, but...
October 30, 2021 at 14:09
I'm taking a break from this. Thanks for the conversation.
October 28, 2021 at 16:07