You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Philosophim

Comments

I have a potentially interesting question for you Bob. Lets say it wasn't some other person, but yourself. You are presented with the following choice...
June 07, 2024 at 21:32
Espero que no te importe que haya usado el traductor de Google para que lo lean nuestros angloparlantes. I google translated for our curious English s...
June 06, 2024 at 12:59
I don't mind answering, just wanted to point out that we can make an infinite number of variables problems like the trolley problem, but the OP is try...
June 04, 2024 at 00:23
I believe those are both of the variables involved. You have to figure out if you do, or do not value one life over five. The second part is responsib...
June 04, 2024 at 00:19
The key to a thought problem is to solve it within its limitations, then afterward extend it into interesting discussion. None of the factors are rele...
June 03, 2024 at 21:29
If you change the thought experiment, then its a different question. Is what I'm stating wrong within the confines of the basic trolley problem? Equal...
June 03, 2024 at 18:42
Which is fine. I can acknowledge that smoking is immoral, but do it anyway. We can say that lying is wrong, yet lie when it conveniences us. The quest...
June 03, 2024 at 17:26
That's fair. If you're looking for a more complete moral theory, the trolley problem is useless. Proper philosophy is built upon several small argumen...
June 03, 2024 at 17:01
No worry! Its not my OP. I didn't think it was off topic though.
June 03, 2024 at 16:17
Because morality is extremely complicated, and you can start with a very simple example that's easy for others to comprehend. In a proper philosophica...
June 03, 2024 at 16:08
Yes, because this is again, not an emotional problem. Morality is not about our emotions. If you can save 1000 over 999, in this very restricted situa...
June 03, 2024 at 16:04
To me, yes. Because the problem as presented is a math problem, and nothing more. We don't know the value of the people on the tracks. So at that poin...
June 03, 2024 at 15:51
Yes, in the context of his example. You mistakenly assumed I meant for all examples, which is normal mistake. If you reread my entire passage however,...
June 03, 2024 at 15:50
Just like they would have condemned the declaration that Earth orbited around the sun. Or many other superstitions and examples of ignorance over the ...
June 03, 2024 at 15:17
Unfortunately this isn't a good example. The situation adds an extra variable of expertise involved. The participants didn't fully understand the situ...
June 03, 2024 at 15:13
I think our differences are that I'm not declaring a principle. I'm declaring, "In X scenario, this is the correct answer". You seem to think I'm exte...
June 03, 2024 at 13:56
That's a statement, not an argument. Please explain how the arithmetic is not crucial when the example only indicates the number of the people on the ...
June 03, 2024 at 12:57
Its not the same, its a variation with a similar theme. My answer is to the specific scenario they gave. Of course the answer is different with a diff...
June 03, 2024 at 12:51
That is a different scenario. What you have is one person on the tracks that can walk away vs five tied down. You're asking to switch the track and te...
June 03, 2024 at 12:38
Here's a fun little game to play that might answer your question. https://trolleyproblem.io/ If of course its simply a matter of numbers, the answer i...
June 03, 2024 at 12:28
I was an American high school algebra math teacher for five years. One of the problems with the way we teach math in the West is we teach formulas for...
June 03, 2024 at 12:25
Genuinely rare. We're freaks of nature. Intelligence at our level is highly difficult to achieve when you consider all of the demands of basic surviva...
June 03, 2024 at 12:03
Just letting you know I read it. I got my gloom shot in the arm for the day from it! Yes, I'm aware of all of these things, but humanity finds a way. ...
June 02, 2024 at 22:59
Timothy, I'm not really seeing you address the idea of innate ideas. You're more addressing the idea of innate nature. Locke doesn't deny we have inna...
June 02, 2024 at 22:52
Thank you for the kind words T Clark! I am trying to cut some of these larger ideas into more manageable pieces, and the feedback really helps. :)
June 02, 2024 at 00:15
I have no idea. He put two incoherent sentences together, and I've been trying to get him to explain what he meant by them. Instead he wants to climb ...
May 21, 2024 at 16:48
Didn't you tell me earlier you believed what was moral was for humans to flourish? How exactly are you helping that right now? Enough trolling my thre...
May 21, 2024 at 05:46
To note again, there is a previous post that puts out the proof that existence is good in any objective morality. Its the link at the top. Feel free t...
May 21, 2024 at 00:50
The quote is an opinion that does not address the logic that I wrote which lead to the conclusion. Here is the original logic if you were unaware of i...
May 20, 2024 at 19:29
How is it not necessarily so? Where's the fallacy? If all are true, then the logic is true no? If you have an issue with one being true, which one? If...
May 20, 2024 at 18:52
If good = "What ought to be" and Existence = good then More existence = more good
May 20, 2024 at 18:37
No, that's not a fallacy. Feel free to challenge the definition. If you can give a reasoned counter why that should not be the definition of what is g...
May 20, 2024 at 18:02
Absolutely. Its partly why I'm posting it here. Looking for criticism and challenges. Thank you, those are kind words. I don't want to leave the intro...
May 20, 2024 at 18:00
Did you read the original post? https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/15203/in-any-objective-morality-existence-is-inherently-good/p1 This is wher...
May 20, 2024 at 16:58
The conclusion I made is not an opinion. According to the conclusion, no.
May 20, 2024 at 16:54
I would say our opinions do not determine what is objective. Objectivity doesn't care. However, society does not have to accept objective conclusions....
May 20, 2024 at 16:49
No doubt our prejudices incline us towards wanting certain outcomes. But I try to hold myself to a higher standard than that. If you read the OP, you'...
May 20, 2024 at 16:42
Perfect! Yes, I have no way of proving that there is an objective reality. Only that if there is, this is a logical result. So if you decide to believ...
May 20, 2024 at 16:40
This is all a fine opinion, but did you read and understand the OP? Because I show through the argument that if there is an objective morality, existe...
May 20, 2024 at 16:13
Not a problem, ask questions as needed. There's a tiny bit of math and this is a new concept.
May 20, 2024 at 14:54
Alright, I've been polite and you insist on trolling. What a waste of an intellect.
May 19, 2024 at 19:15
If you would expand on your points a bit, I might be able to engage with you. I've tried responding based on what I thought you were trying to say, bu...
May 19, 2024 at 19:03
I continue with the next steps here. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/15217/if-existence-is-good-what-is-the-morality-of-non-life I'm not sur...
May 19, 2024 at 18:45
Statements like these are subjective opinions and don't address the OP. Feel free to point out where the logic of the OP is flawed and we can discuss ...
May 19, 2024 at 18:43
As I noted in the OP, if you have an issue with existence being good, please go back to the previous thread to discuss.
May 19, 2024 at 18:10
So then its possible. Do you see you keep making contradictions to yourself? So we can imagine without an image. Which is still just imagining somethi...
May 16, 2024 at 23:24
Just because you cannot imagine it, does not make it impossible right? So it is imaginable then. And an eternal existence can still be empirical, so t...
May 16, 2024 at 22:59
You too Bob! I'll have the second part posted this weekend, we can touch base again for the second part to see if that resolves your issue.
May 16, 2024 at 22:40
1. Where is your proof that an objective moral good could not possibly be an empirical existent? 2. What is a transcendent guarantor and what is your ...
May 16, 2024 at 22:00
I didn't think I sidestepped. I thought I addressed this with the grandfather and the grandson next to the explosion, and only one being able to live....
May 16, 2024 at 21:35