You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Galuchat

Comments

You have my attention. Please elaborate upon the connection. Thanks.
September 14, 2017 at 17:01
Being is an English language present participle (i.e., present tense verbal form used as an adjective) which refers to something that actually exists....
September 14, 2017 at 12:57
I previously noted one relevant fact: consciousness exists. Criterial evidence: the conscious behaviour of animals. From this: 1) What are some exampl...
September 14, 2017 at 10:41
In resolving conceptual questions, fact should be the starting point for Philosophy. It is the remit of Science, not Philosophy, to establish fact. Th...
September 14, 2017 at 10:04
Cheers.
September 13, 2017 at 18:31
Fair enough. Thanks. So, just to clarify: it's "mind" which is "the creative force that permeates the universe"? And do all living organisms have mind...
September 13, 2017 at 17:50
If so, do you have an answer for the OP (i.e., "how one can logically go from inanimate matter to conscious agency")?
September 13, 2017 at 17:23
Definitions aren't labels. What is "the creative force that permeates the universe"?
September 13, 2017 at 17:08
Is this your definition of consciousness? And is it a panpsychist conception?
September 13, 2017 at 16:39
Thanks for the link. Javra has mentioned similar research in previous posts. I'm not sure whether the explanations offered are analogous or metaphoric...
September 13, 2017 at 15:44
I would say that sentence is meaningless because I connected awareness with mental (i.e., mind) experiences, not with brains. In any case, you are cor...
September 13, 2017 at 14:02
I agree. It's obvious to me that plants and bacteria are at least responsive to their environments. But are plants sensitive in that they have mental ...
September 13, 2017 at 12:50
Another good question. Answer: No. But since it doesn't cost much to establish the fact that not only conscious, but also semi-conscious and non-consc...
September 13, 2017 at 12:40
Good question. Given the following tentative definitions: 1) Conscious: fully responsive and fully aware. 2) Responsive: receptive and/or reactive. 3)...
September 13, 2017 at 11:20
And as viewed apart from space and time. Both immanent and transcendent. Perhaps immanently perfect because also transcendent?
September 12, 2017 at 11:10
ego eimi (Greek present tense): continuous self existence. Conscious agency (i.e., creative power)?
September 11, 2017 at 10:49
The subject is pansemiosis, not semiosis. Sorry, I'm not interested in playing word games. Enjoy yourself!
September 10, 2017 at 11:07
What are you not understanding?
September 10, 2017 at 10:48
Most scientists should be "into" complete explanations which transcend spatiotemporal domains. Since human beings are natural, living, psychophysical ...
September 10, 2017 at 10:25
Good point. Quite plausible. I agree with Hoffman to this extent: conscious agency is a creative power and fact of human nature. I agree. To address h...
September 09, 2017 at 11:41
Lower levels of description always underdetermine higher levels. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University P...
September 08, 2017 at 21:19
Thanks for your careful reply. Surely, even a process can be defined. And the value of defining consciousness lies in the fact that it is the topic of...
September 08, 2017 at 11:28
Donald Hoffman has a religious background. So, I think that Conscious Realism only works as part of a theological system. What I find interesting abou...
September 07, 2017 at 14:18
Your scientific knowledge base is (at least) extensive, and your scientific understanding is, in many respects, profound. So, I suspect that you are m...
September 07, 2017 at 10:15
Why always retreat to pansemiosis as if it were some type of panacea when it is apparently only capable of defining conscious experience as a feeling,...
September 07, 2017 at 07:00
So, mind is a feeling? Is this a general definition of mind, or just a definition of human mind?
September 06, 2017 at 14:43
It's true that if brain anatomy has been injured, or brain physiology is not functioning normally, psychological function will also be abnormal. That ...
September 05, 2017 at 21:56
This is an engaging introduction to semiotics, written by an acknowledged leader in the field (cheers, darthbarracuda): Sebeok, Thomas A. (2001). Sign...
September 05, 2017 at 12:54
It's a fair question. I have obviously not used the term "dual aspect" as it is traditionally used in philosophy of mind, but have applied it to Arist...
September 05, 2017 at 11:25
Yes. That is the debate within the semiotics community apokrisis and I have been referring to. http://biosemiosis.blogspot.co.uk/2008/07/re-pan-and-bi...
September 05, 2017 at 10:37
Incorrect. Dual aspect monism: form+matter=substance (i.e., genetic predisposition plus living matter produces a living being having a set of powers)....
September 05, 2017 at 09:43
I don't see a gap to bridge. Your equation is an expression of Aristotle's form (species-specific genetic predisposition to develop and exercise a par...
September 04, 2017 at 14:07
Because it works?
September 03, 2017 at 12:28
Bohm2 mentioned Hoffman in a post on the old site about 15-18 months ago, complete with a link to a fascinating YouTube video where Hoffman demonstrat...
September 03, 2017 at 11:42
Psychophysical unity makes sense to me; some might call it dual aspect monism. But what is sentience? A capacity for sensation? And what is sensation?...
September 01, 2017 at 16:10
I agree. Of course, most are aware that the global economy is currently experiencing an engineered "prosperity" which will be subjected to a natural c...
September 01, 2017 at 13:16
It would be a useful public policy tool to have a model which predicts the optimal number and type (age range, religion, academic and professional qua...
September 01, 2017 at 09:20
The largest and most complex type of human social group is the stratified society, which is composed of nested complex systems (e.g., political, econo...
August 31, 2017 at 16:48
How is the tag example oddly individualistic? If the problem is presented in terms of game theory, isn't it applicable to many types of behaviour (inc...
August 30, 2017 at 12:16
Good point. But, if a learning game, then not applicable to political economy?
August 29, 2017 at 14:08
I agree. I think each boy decides what type of game it is, and how they will play it, before the game even begins. I think any game which doesn't have...
August 29, 2017 at 11:18
Is temperament correlated with motivation?
August 28, 2017 at 20:51
Thanks for the clarification. Inasmuch as the game of tag you described is a display of aggression (specifically, dominance) by an individual, the sit...
August 26, 2017 at 22:05
And this: "The shift from Newtonian determinism to statistical science is what makes a physics of society possible." - Philip Ball (Critical Mass, 200...
August 26, 2017 at 15:53
It's social-ethical behaviour; so, analogous to many (if not most, or all) instances of social group dynamics (e.g., a philosophy forum). Or, consider...
August 26, 2017 at 08:18
If you're genuinely interested, read the referenced book carefully. I don't have time to explain the same thing 10 different ways. Good luck!
August 23, 2017 at 10:59
It never seemed like a game to me; blood sport, yes. Neural atypicality seems to be an advantage.
August 22, 2017 at 16:50
"Mind" is the name of a verbal concept which can be described as: the set of faculties exercised by a psychophysical being which produce natural and a...
August 22, 2017 at 10:58
I agree. Generally, the cause of motivation is dissatisfaction. Specifically, dissatisfaction due to: 1) Negative affect produced by unpleasant sensat...
August 21, 2017 at 15:54
In my current conception: 1) The domain of Cognitive Psychology explains natural behaviour. 2) The domain of Social Psychology explains acculturated b...
August 21, 2017 at 10:01