Oh no! Here's another "clear concept" for you: ’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: All mimsy were the borogoves, And ...
I mean, there's very little to disagree with here... Your point is that Dostoevsky was a Christian philosopher? It's like writing an essay to prove Ei...
To play devil's advocate (heh...) Satanism seems to have begun as LaVey's atheistic pseudoreligion, but over time the word "Satan" has come to mean va...
You know those facehuggers from the Alien movies, which lay eggs in your throat which then hatch and burst out your chest? I always wondered where the...
Sorry, I should have been more clear; I'm using "noumenon" in the Kantian sense. Here's a brief mention of Buddhist influence on Heidegger in Wikipedi...
Thank you for the clarifications @fdrake My understanding of Heidegger, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is as follows: 1. Cartesian ontology prove...
This is violence against logic. What you're attempting to say is: \forall x ( \neg p \implies p ) \forall x (\neg p) \therefore \forall x (p) Translat...
That is a very thoughtful post. Some responses: The critique of logic you mention-- that we have to explicitly state relationships such as that the se...
Because if an opinion is logically unsound, then it is obviously inferior? Hence why I am asking for help understanding why this would not be the case...
Comments