You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Have some tea

['Member']Joined: July 13, 2020 at 12:20Last active: August 19, 2020 at 06:20None discussions5 comments

Comments

Ahhhhh, ok, now I get it. Thanks for the explanation! I have to say this is a very positive and optimistic view :up:
July 15, 2020 at 15:10
Ok, I agree, but the fact that he rejects answering unanswerable questions raises another question for me. How does he define whether a question is un...
July 15, 2020 at 11:02
:up: :up:
July 14, 2020 at 13:08
hahahah, that's a really good point. When I first read this post, my first thought was that "Bill" was in denial, but I wasn't sure if that was an acc...
July 14, 2020 at 13:01
I think Bill is what is known as a skeptic, philosophically. They look at a philosophical question carefully, but once they find out that it's "unansw...
July 14, 2020 at 09:12