You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

RussellA

Comments

True. My saying that "thoughts exist" is a raw assertion without any definition of either "thoughts" or "exist". But considering books have been writt...
February 27, 2025 at 13:04
EPP = existence is prioir to predication. It depends whether existence is referring to 1) the existence of the Universe prior to the predication of an...
February 26, 2025 at 17:33
Yes I agree. Whoever sees a broken window can use all their senses, reasoning and available evidence, such as a rock lying on the floor inside the roo...
February 26, 2025 at 16:51
Direct Realism I would guess that half of everyone on the Forum are Direct Realists. Some of your comments suggest that you are a Direct Realist page ...
February 26, 2025 at 11:04
Meinong For Meinong, the unicorn, being mythical, makes it subsist, rather than the horse, which exists. From the Merriam Webster Both the horse and u...
February 26, 2025 at 10:16
:up:
February 26, 2025 at 09:42
The EPP (existence is prior to predication) may refer to things other than objects. Thoughts exist in the mind. Are thoughts objects? Rain exists in t...
February 25, 2025 at 15:46
Properties are predicated of something. From SEP - Properties Our only belief about things-in-themselves comes from experiences in our five senses. Fo...
February 25, 2025 at 14:57
For Meinong, exist, subsist and absist are part of a hierarchy. Round squares absist but cannot subsist or exist. Sherlock Holmes can absist but not e...
February 25, 2025 at 13:57
There is another aspect that is critical to the difference between Indirect and Direct Realism, and that is the direction of flow of information in a ...
February 25, 2025 at 13:30
From Wikipedia - Direct and indirect realism Suppose someone sees a red, rectangular brick. Both the Indirect Realist and Direct Realist would agree t...
February 25, 2025 at 09:24
We directly see the consequence of pain, such as someone grimacing. We don't directly see the pain. Suppose I see the colour red. If I were a Direct R...
February 24, 2025 at 18:19
For Meinong, existence is a property. For the EPP, existence is prior to properties. It seems that two senses of "exist" are being used. Meining seems...
February 24, 2025 at 17:47
Meinong's Theory That objects that subsist, such as numbers and Sherlock Holmes, are logically possible and objects that absist, such as a square circ...
February 24, 2025 at 10:37
Both the Indirect and Direct Realist believe that there is a direct causal chain between the thing-in-itself in the world and the experience of it in ...
February 24, 2025 at 09:55
Existence I thought I knew what was happening until I started to read www.ontology.co/meinonga.htm For Meinong, Tom Sawyer would be an example of "sub...
February 23, 2025 at 13:53
Knowledge As an Indirect Realist, I don't know that some mind-independent thing-in-itself caused my (EDIT) experiences, but I believe that they did. T...
February 23, 2025 at 13:40
Properties For Meinong, the target of a mental act, an intentional act, is an "object" (Wikipedia - Alexius Meinong) Suppose I thought about the objec...
February 23, 2025 at 13:35
It seems to me that, when discussing Meinong, the word "exist" is only used when referring to the world, not the mind. I would say that thoughts exist...
February 22, 2025 at 12:59
For Meinong, in the world an object may exist, such as a horse, may subsist, such as a number or absist, such as a round square. Objects have properti...
February 22, 2025 at 12:44
The impossibility of knowing the thing-in-itself Everything we know about the "world" comes from our experiences. From these experiences we can make a...
February 22, 2025 at 11:43
Does Meinong's "being" mean anything? For Meinong there are three kinds of objects. Those that exist, those that subsist and those that absist. All th...
February 22, 2025 at 11:34
Is a lack of properties a property? The statement "a lack of properties is itself a property" breaks the Law of Non-contradiction. From the Law of Non...
February 22, 2025 at 11:30
In case a moderator is reading this, the OP needs an understanding of what is true and what is false, what is better and what is worse. The OP is abou...
February 21, 2025 at 14:59
Yes, on the one hand Keir Starmer said 4 January 2024 that he would clean up politics. On the other hand, he accepted gifts from Labour peer Lord Alli...
February 21, 2025 at 11:32
The will of the majority is the worst form of government there is apart from for all the other systems of government which have been tried. "Democracy...
February 20, 2025 at 17:40
If in a room of 100 people, 1 person says that they see the ghost of Napoleon, but the other 99 say that they don't, then this is objective evidence t...
February 20, 2025 at 16:22
But how can you know about the properties of a thing-in-itself if you have no knowledge of the thing-in-itself? Our only knowledge comes from mental a...
February 20, 2025 at 10:49
I agree, as long as society thinks that a strict legal system is moral. The Argument from Hallucination against Direct Realism is making an objective ...
February 20, 2025 at 10:08
I don't think that it is grammatically correct to say that a lack of properties is itself a property. Both the EPP and Meinong accept that properties ...
February 20, 2025 at 10:03
Hardly highly unlikely. "In the 21st century, hudud, including amputation of limbs, is part of the legal systems of Brunei, Iran, Nigeria, Saudi Arabi...
February 20, 2025 at 09:17
Being an extreme case doesn't in itself make a logical fallacy. I agree that an extreme case, where an argument is exaggerated to such a hyperbolic de...
February 19, 2025 at 17:09
I don't think that society would willingly accept a legal system that was immoral. I have no evidence, but I am sure that this is the case. Being an e...
February 19, 2025 at 13:55
The problem is that it is impossible to talk about properties independent of our experiences of them. The question is about the relationship between e...
February 19, 2025 at 13:49
The law could state that the punishment for stealing anything valued up to £50 was the amputation of the right hand. You are right that the law judges...
February 19, 2025 at 11:16
No, as only moral laws are valid. It is not morally wrong to break a law that itself is not moral. I agree that it is the moral thing to do to follow ...
February 19, 2025 at 09:57
What does prior in "existence is prior to predication" mean? From SEP - Existence From Merriam Webster, "prior" may mean i) earlier in time or order i...
February 18, 2025 at 17:06
For humans, humans are more important than cats. For cats, cats are more important than mice. For mice, mice are more important than cockroaches For c...
February 18, 2025 at 14:14
It is the moral thing that morality precedes legality, even if that is not always the case. I don't think the public would accept a legal system that ...
February 18, 2025 at 14:01
That means that philosophical questions about the nature of time, space and the Universe are less important than philosophical questions about the hum...
February 18, 2025 at 12:46
Perhaps, but as you correctly wrote:
February 18, 2025 at 10:09
Why is the ability to judge of "special" importance? I agree that it is an important philosophical question, but why more important than other philoso...
February 18, 2025 at 09:50
A very good philosophical question. The philosophy of particle physics is an academic topic. For example, the Cambridge University press has a series ...
February 18, 2025 at 09:40
I believe that for Bertrand Russell, there is something that is an apple and is red. Being an apple is a predication in the same way that being red is...
February 17, 2025 at 17:13
Moral absolutism is a meta ethical view that some or even all actions are intrinsically right or wrong, regardless of context or consequence (Wikipedi...
February 17, 2025 at 16:57
I agree that once the criminal laws have been established, it then becomes a legal rather than moral judgment. But the criminal justice system will on...
February 17, 2025 at 16:34
Yes, legal judgments are different to moral judgements. But as bread is different to wheat, bread is made from wheat. Legal judgements are founded in ...
February 17, 2025 at 15:12
Moral Relativism rather than Moral Absolutism.
February 17, 2025 at 14:19
OK, lets consider 2025 and avoid anachronism. Stoning to death is a legal punishment for adultery in Iran, and therefore normative within Iran today (...
February 17, 2025 at 14:14
Slavery was normative in Ancient Rome and played an important role in its society and economy (Wikipedia - Slavery in ancient Rome) It may well be tha...
February 17, 2025 at 13:10