You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Kenosha Kid

Comments

Actually even without inflationary theory that's fine. Good old-fashioned "where did that come from?" Big Bang gives you an infinite past, from a poin...
June 22, 2020 at 21:10
Okay you kinda edited out the bit that was clearly talking about lengths. A ruler does not change in position between one end and the other. A mountai...
June 22, 2020 at 20:54
Why? If it is infinite and expanding, then in the past it was still infinite and expanding. No start required. Gravity is a requirement for life, true...
June 22, 2020 at 20:44
I've mentioned one in every post, yes! It'd be most fraudulent to say it was mine though. I am agnostic on it too. It is a fallacy that I can reject a...
June 22, 2020 at 20:29
Plumbers and carpenters do work for someone else for the money they need to feed their families. It's just nicely abstracted now. Communists have plum...
June 22, 2020 at 20:22
The inflation field can cause something and is self-driven. That's rather why I mentioned it. Your body is fine-tuned as a walking bacterium habitat. ...
June 22, 2020 at 20:09
Yes, technology is not kind to peasants. No, I'm a peasant only insofar as I must labour for someone else in order to feed and house my family. I may ...
June 22, 2020 at 19:42
Again, according to the creationist mindset which ascribes agency to anything it doesn't understand. There is still no reason why a first cause needs ...
June 22, 2020 at 19:35
A creationist may not be able to abide the lack of an intelligent first cause. That does not necessitate an intelligent creator. Yes, something can be...
June 22, 2020 at 19:22
I think this is less about property, though, and more the way we personalise space as extensions of ourselves. It is because the burglar was in my hom...
June 22, 2020 at 19:01
What Aquinus regurgitated was that there must either be a first cause or an infinite regress of causes. The failure of his logic was to suddenly shout...
June 22, 2020 at 18:57
I'm not sure I'm familiar with it. I know that the left here is very decentred, with everyone being a Nazi to someone else. The socialist, largely ath...
June 22, 2020 at 17:09
Obviously this kind of data is going to be sprawling. One is the historic exit poll data from US elections, which shows that the predominant religious...
June 22, 2020 at 16:20
I have seen some, yes. When I put my PC back together I will dig it out. The Hitler/Stalin thing, I guess. I don't see much difference between religio...
June 22, 2020 at 14:45
Yes. We might colloquially say that a ruler goes from one end to another, but nothing is really going anywhere: it just occupies that space. It is a s...
June 22, 2020 at 13:42
Did you really think I'd be pro-inheritance with that viewpoint?
June 22, 2020 at 12:45
Eh? You think peasants owned the land they farmed? What?
June 22, 2020 at 12:37
It can, yes, e.g. the distance travelled by a hiker. But does that necessitate a hiker in order to have some concept of distance? No. So does somethin...
June 22, 2020 at 12:36
Nationality has some importance. It is important to acknowledge that local customs when travelling differ from those you are used to at home, for inst...
June 22, 2020 at 12:32
Does a distance represent some change in spatial location? It's the same thing. Just that, in relativity, an object is said to be moving through time....
June 22, 2020 at 11:39
I don't see any religious element to my response. I am one of the multitude who must labour for others in order to provide for my family. I am a peasa...
June 22, 2020 at 11:26
Or a rich bastard obvs.
June 22, 2020 at 09:04
But there's no going back. It just goes from thieving bastard to either offspring or another thieving bastard. It's still theft.
June 22, 2020 at 09:03
The precise history will depend on the place you're talking about. Here in England, land was seized by force by Roman forces and distributed among Rom...
June 22, 2020 at 08:19
A "change" in temporal position, as referred to by myself, meant nothing more than an interval of time over which we can consider different positions ...
June 22, 2020 at 07:54
https://i.pinimg.com/236x/2a/e1/44/2ae144b9ae6ee8417826c1030d60fa13--monty-python-funny-people.jpg No, but people who find information in them that is...
June 21, 2020 at 23:22
So being a genius female lawyer would not increase the average IQ of women because there's no Nobel prize for it? Dude, seriously! You've anchored you...
June 21, 2020 at 20:44
So you're actually agreeing that if there had never been a female scientist, their lack of Nobel prizes would show they were less intelligent?
June 21, 2020 at 20:27
Wow! So if there were no female scientists, the fact that none could win Nobel prizes would make men more intelligent?
June 21, 2020 at 20:10
Aye, but this phone is really crap. I can hit the edit button a hundred times and nothing happening.
June 21, 2020 at 17:10
I have that idea, the analogy is fit for that purpose. What I want to know is the sorts of things preserved to ensure causality in the moral dimension...
June 21, 2020 at 16:48
I hate this phone. That's what I meant by it being more collaborative.
June 21, 2020 at 16:10
Yeah that's what I meant by it bei
June 21, 2020 at 16:10
:up: What's shameful looking at that is that no woman has won the Nobel prize for physics solo, which means that even when women are doing great resea...
June 21, 2020 at 15:52
I'm screaming out some tunes at the recording studio to no obvious purpose :)
June 21, 2020 at 15:40
Absolutely! As the editor of New Scientist once said: "We think science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can *&!# off!" :rofl: But none of t...
June 21, 2020 at 14:58
Ahhhhh okay, sorry. Sure! Science is a mode of reason.
June 21, 2020 at 14:36
No worries Luke. I'm glad we persevered even when our tempers strained. Kinematics holds in eternalism and presentism. That is, it doesn't care how yo...
June 21, 2020 at 13:34
The stars are hotter than I am, so what?
June 21, 2020 at 13:25
I don't think that makes sense. If reason and logic are emergent phenomena, than their modes are reasonable and logical. It doesn't become unreasonabl...
June 21, 2020 at 13:24
It is not the scientist's view that explaining something is the same as dismissing it. A non-materialist may well, due to prejudice against material s...
June 21, 2020 at 12:42
I wasn't posing an example that involved sight generally. The example was more specific. This is starting to feel a little like sophistry tbh. A scien...
June 21, 2020 at 11:57
Yes, I don't mean an answer that needs a particle accelerator and complex of fizzing beakers and tubes. "How was the Earth created?" is a scientific q...
June 21, 2020 at 11:06
It was probably an incorrect use of terminology on my part (I'm not a cognitive neuroscientist). I just meant whatever the visual cortex does. No spoo...
June 21, 2020 at 10:59
It's not about overriding your own moral values, but the morals of others. Living inauthentically is being how others want you to be instead of being ...
June 21, 2020 at 10:53
Unless you are L. Ron Hubbard risen again, no I am not. It was for completeness that I pointed that a religion does not need an original believer. You...
June 21, 2020 at 10:40
It is the definition of velocity in kinematics. If position depends on time, position has a gradient with respect to time in the exact same way altitu...
June 21, 2020 at 10:38
So they context of that was questions formulated into a mutually-comprehensible schema, such as phenomonology, that made both philosophical and scient...
June 21, 2020 at 10:35
:up: My first thought too.
June 21, 2020 at 00:30
No, not at all, as per the mountain example. You don't need a hiker to have a gradient. You don't need a temporal hiker to have a gradient either.
June 21, 2020 at 00:27