I don't know what this god is that you speak of could you define what that is with clear attributes, no semantics, equivocations, contradictions, asse...
You are having such a difficult time understanding ignosticism and likewise probably in trying to understand meta-philosophy (another field of study) ...
What is this god you speak of? If its the universe were all theists, if its a square circle were all atheists, if it's a deistic variety by definition...
If I cannot will you bury me with an Argumentum ad populum? This is non-cognitivism. At least with respect to religious discussions but because its fo...
No, it exists and I'm not exactly sure why you think it's a relative nothing. It contains inherent geometrical properties and perhaps is even affected...
Why do you indulge him when he seems to intentionally ignore that an anecdotal (perhaps second to even third hand or more) stories relaying true facts...
Well actually its rather popular for physicists now to elaborate on spacetime being a substance in its own right perhaps dualistically coexistent with...
Then I would wonder why there is a field of philosophy (meta-philosophy) that even discusses the primary reason to study philosophy or if it does actu...
Not exactly a definite answer but a collection of answers. Intriguing perspective. . . I wouldn't have thought to dive right into the semantic end but...
The first is direct personal admittance of ignorance and the latter comments a form of epistemologically successful deduction on your part. A respecta...
I'd be rather careful with extrapolating physical theories as such given their parasitic assumptions on certain space-time philosophies. In this case ...
F-it. I'm done, this is giving me anxiety with your constant convolution of the discussion or constant re-adjusting of positions/lines of argumentatio...
Are you being jokey/sarcastic, pedantic, or really wondering about the grammatical/language/philosophy that goes into a proper definition? Though, if ...
I can stand up and move my arms. Yes, you can do two things at once and here you are doing one thing (daydreaming) while not doing another as efficien...
Partially. What you mean consciousness can do two things at once? It can only be conscious of experiences and those it isn't are called unconscious. I...
You should know that a lack of imagination or scientific knowledge on the matter should only subscribe you do at the most a sense of indifference/agno...
Now you are truly a creationist who doesn't understand that evolutionary theory and cosmology/physics are different scientific disciplines or here you...
Depends on what parts of brain were responsible for correct motor control and what parts were responsible for daydreaming as well as whether you would...
The mind would be studied in metaphysics whether it was purely idealist or arose in an emergent sense from physical processes (which you haven't defin...
I'm asking why you only want to seem to discuss language? But you also wrote that something is or isn't metaphysical when you really mean't is it some...
Exactly certain things are studied by metaphysicians such as the mind or physical reality but there is nothing that is metaphysical only studied by me...
You're playing a semantics game like calling the universe god and not defining what you mean by god or merely just having the word "god" be a place ho...
No, that metaphysics may or may not encompass what was called natural philosophy but we call today the sciences including physics, chemistry, biology,...
How about you watch this. It literally goes over many misconceptions creationists such as you have about evolution including mentioning that lots of t...
Yes, so if call a tree a truck then a truck is a tree and vice versa. Basically you are fucking language raw if I may put in less appealing or rather ...
Yes but it's not a substance it's a discipline of study. That may or may not include scientific methodology or the natural sciences which DEPEND on ou...
So it's just as ontologically irrelevant to everyday experience just as a mirage is not a bunch of palm trees and a pool of water. (If you are going t...
I'm starting to realize that you are pretty much just a troll who doesn't understand evolution or hold such a straw man view of it that it would alway...
It would contradict your abhorrent abuse of a term "metaphysical" which stands for a discipline of study. Why would (AFTER DEFINING WHAT A PHYSICAL TH...
No some parts of consciousness may be non-reductive to their physical counterparts or be entirely different substances (or have different ontological ...
Define god. Try defining consciousness without appealing to science or losing sight of our personal experience/everything in scientific psychology to ...
I guess ignostic would usually best describe my true position but having people call me an atheist is easier as well as more well known. Most of us ar...
You haven't defined what a god is so I can't specify whether it doesn't exist, it's improbable, or the arguments for it are lacking. At this point i'm...
Are you talking about epistemology (what method), personal philosophy and introspection (why do I keep living), or psychology/evolutionary biology? Ag...
Most of these questions seem to concern the scientific study of psychology, personal arbitrary convictions that may not possess a "best answer", or co...
Then don't bring up the philosophy of religion or ethics. Sociology goes hand in hand with these. It literally didn't post quotes for some reason. I c...
Why suppose this definition of atheism rather than the Dawkins scale or a four scale one in which we split atheists into two evidential claims of conf...
I'd say this is a rather respectful position to partake in as it's probably rather a common intuition among both relationists/substantivalists that al...
We need to make a distinction between abstractions/quantitative theories of our reality and the interpretations of those theories (from metaphysics) t...
How do not know this? It's the time measured by a clock that remains in your frame of reference or world line in special relativity. Philosophical int...
Comments