You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

Very good. Point well made.
November 22, 2024 at 01:33
Why do you think the first articulation of the is/ought problem came from David Hume, the 'godfather of positivism', and a principal of the Scottish E...
November 21, 2024 at 23:55
The silver lining is that Gaetz is out of the game. No doubt he will join the rogues' gallery that will comprise the Trump Regime, but him being out o...
November 21, 2024 at 23:06
It's a pretty carefully put-together OP, but on an unpopular topic. The first forum I signed up to was on Richard Dawkins website, around 2008, which ...
November 21, 2024 at 22:37
a reference for the benefit of anyone interested.
November 21, 2024 at 22:32
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262553032/the-blind-spot/
November 21, 2024 at 22:19
You mentioned that a collection of three sticks can make a triangle - which is a form. It signifies. A simple example, but the same principle is behin...
November 21, 2024 at 21:15
Funny, my mail still gets delivered regularly.
November 21, 2024 at 11:02
Let me ask you - is your knowledge of your own being knowledge of something objectively existent?
November 21, 2024 at 10:58
My first reply gives some detail - 'substance' was used to translate ousia in Aristotle, meaning 'being' from the Greek verb 'to be'. So whereas subst...
November 21, 2024 at 10:42
When I did undergrad studies, Heraclitus (everything changes all the time) and Parmenides (the real never changes at all) were presented as two poles ...
November 21, 2024 at 10:16
'You can never eat dinner off the same plate twice' ~ Paraclitus
November 21, 2024 at 10:05
Perhaps they have little idea what they actually were voting for. Already, true to form, the headlines are being dominated by ethical scandals and cov...
November 21, 2024 at 08:42
I'm sorry, I don't understand the question.
November 21, 2024 at 08:42
I suppose in line with what Schumacher says, 'more real' in the sense of possessing a greater degree of organisation, and a greater degree of agency a...
November 21, 2024 at 08:06
Yes, I suppose that is a poor example. I suppose what I was driving at, is the various degrees of the grasp of reality, not degrees of reality per se....
November 21, 2024 at 07:46
Really no idea, at this point, why this OP got started.
November 21, 2024 at 07:31
Luke Barnes refutes Victor Stenger. 'The will not to believe is just as strong as the will to believe' ~ Prof Ian Stevenson.
November 21, 2024 at 04:38
Oh, we have plenty. And therein lies a considerable proportion of semiotics, among other things.
November 21, 2024 at 04:15
Not that aspect, more that the individual as the arbiter of value, and that all individuals are equal in principle. Within an heirarchical ontology, t...
November 21, 2024 at 00:45
Not yours, in particular, but the general tendency towards reification of 'forms' such that they are depicted as existing in a platonic realm. My revi...
November 20, 2024 at 23:57
Splendid idea! The source of the quote is 17th Century Theories of Substance in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Substance My understanding is...
November 20, 2024 at 23:49
See the newly-started thread Degrees of Reality, which will mention Heidegger in the forthcoming post.
November 20, 2024 at 23:36
Yes, that David Stove, under whom I studied Hume. I didn't learn about his 'gem' until much later, but I can't say I think much of it. (See a critique...
November 20, 2024 at 21:59
There are many interesting practical philosophy writers on Medium and Substack. Too many to follow, really. Masimo Piggliuci is one. Many of those wri...
November 20, 2024 at 06:13
Facing the Great Divide, Bhikkhu Bodhi. Beyond Scientific Materialism and Religious Belief, Akinko Weber. There really is such a thing as 'the unitive...
November 20, 2024 at 05:02
The conflict, if it is a conflict, between secular and sacred readings of traditional and pre-modern culture, is also a factor in Buddhist modernism. ...
November 20, 2024 at 04:10
Surely. I suppose a traditionalist way of putting it, would be the relationship of scientia and sapientia, which don’t conflict, but have a different ...
November 20, 2024 at 02:23
Why thanks, that means a lot, coming from you. :pray:
November 20, 2024 at 02:17
It’s because there’s a kind of unspoken prohibition on certain topics or attitudes in the consensus view. I’m reminded of a clause in the founding cha...
November 19, 2024 at 23:54
As pointed out, the texts lend themselves to a variety of interpretations. That is part of their inexhaustible nature. But nevertheless I presume at l...
November 19, 2024 at 23:20
There is no collapse. That's why I differentiated myself from Penrose's account. No ghost, and no collapse.
November 19, 2024 at 22:58
Depending on what happens, I think the US is approaching the point where it simply has to acknowledge that Donald Trump is above the law. If he succee...
November 19, 2024 at 22:51
Instructive that you think that I think there are any. But thanks for the explanation.
November 19, 2024 at 22:43
Ah yes. With the magical supervenience, which fills all manner of explanatory gaps.
November 19, 2024 at 22:34
But isn't it also possible that traditionalist interpretation of Plato - the mystical side of Plato, if you like - has been deprecated by secular cult...
November 19, 2024 at 22:16
You complimented my essay on it. You will no doubt recall the citation: What do you make of this criticism from the above-mentioned SEP article on met...
November 19, 2024 at 22:13
Portentious, then, that Albert Einstein himself felt obliged to ask his friend Abraham Pais 'does the moon continue to exist when we're not looking at...
November 19, 2024 at 21:41
I rather like to think that philosophy is concerned with reality as lived. It's in that sense that it is concerned with the nature and meaning of bein...
November 19, 2024 at 20:57
Time comes into existence with minds. Outside minds there is no time. You and I understand what pulsars are, and remote stars, and planets, because we...
November 19, 2024 at 08:47
I am questioning that 'x can be the case even if nobody knows it'. It doesn't mean that in the absence of any knowledge of it, 'x' does not exist or c...
November 19, 2024 at 07:35
I do now. Thanks for the reminder, I will re-visit it.
November 19, 2024 at 06:32
And the reason I'm impressed with that book is that I think it is one of the many in that emerging area of cognitivism and cognitive science, which pr...
November 19, 2024 at 06:05
The passage that is being commented on was from the abstract of a book I mentioned, Charles Pinter, Mind and the Cosmic Order. It is of course difficu...
November 19, 2024 at 06:04
Which neither you nor anyone would ever know, were we not around :rage:
November 19, 2024 at 05:47
That was never at issue, but please let's leave it there.
November 19, 2024 at 05:44
But as I said, that is the case for any empirical fact whatever. You're loosing sight of what 'mind independent' means if indeed you ever had sight of...
November 19, 2024 at 05:30
We might imagine that it would continue to exist, but whatever existence it possesses would be unrecognisable to human intelligence. I did mention Wit...
November 19, 2024 at 05:19
The 'forms of intuition' - namely, space and time - and the world of appearances exist only in relation to the subject's cognitive faculties. If the t...
November 19, 2024 at 05:01
The same can be said for any empirical fact whatever, but that is still not the point at issue. Incidentally, the passage I quoted was the absract of ...
November 19, 2024 at 04:42