You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

I think the answer starts with 'learn Ancient Greek' :-| So, no, I don't expect that I could give any account of the 'idea of the intelligibility of t...
August 25, 2016 at 02:36
I took that to be the gist of your remark 'Whether it be 'things fall towards the Earth because of Newton's inverse square law of gravity' or 'the wor...
August 25, 2016 at 02:23
No, because I think within Platonism there is, I think, a terminus of explanation or a vision of the intelligibility of the Cosmos, which originated w...
August 24, 2016 at 23:22
@andrewk - your definition of 'intelligibility' is a perfectly normal one in day to day terms. But that's not what I was referring to. I was referring...
August 24, 2016 at 22:54
There's also the neat fact that, in sub-atomic physics, you can collide two things and end up with more than two, as the energy of the collision gets ...
August 24, 2016 at 22:28
What Darwinism has actually done is provide an explanation where there was none. A biological explanation - but at the cost of the devaluing of reason...
August 24, 2016 at 21:15
Here's the thing - 'intelligibility' basically means that something makes sense. And, since about, oh, I don't know, sometime in the 19th Century, the...
August 24, 2016 at 11:34
The reason 'science cannot tell us these things' is because it is not omniscience.
August 24, 2016 at 11:02
You've been saying such things for millenia.....
August 24, 2016 at 10:23
The qualifier ruins it. In the traditional understanding, something is either intelligible or it isn't.
August 24, 2016 at 09:31
Isn't that just plain relativism? Whatever suits you? You can dress it up with all manner of learned references but I think that is all you mean.
August 24, 2016 at 08:02
They don't take any care whatever. In their view, as all religion is reactionary superstitious nonsense, then it doesn't deserve any real analysis or ...
August 22, 2016 at 21:00
Harmony comes at the cost of all being in the same key, for starters. Nowadays, that is regarded as authoritarian.
August 22, 2016 at 10:35
Isn't there any empirical data?
August 22, 2016 at 09:17
Quite right! But imagine this scenario: before becoming a firefighter, there was another choice. Her father was a firefighter, and had impressed on he...
August 21, 2016 at 10:32
The first question is an example of inductive logic. The second is an example of deductive or a priori logic. It's a textbook example. You could perfo...
August 21, 2016 at 08:52
I wonder if it can be integrated with Quantum Darwinism:
August 21, 2016 at 05:35
you will notice that the post you're quoting was deleted by me, actually about 30 seconds after dashing it off, because I had second thoughts about be...
August 21, 2016 at 05:07
hey don't sweat it and I apologise also if I seemed brusque.
August 21, 2016 at 02:18
You toss these phrases off, as if it is all settled, as if understanding the issues is really simple. But it really is not, all you're communicating i...
August 21, 2016 at 00:34
What does 'form meaning' mean? The nature of meaning is far from obvious. There is a subsection of books on the subject 'the metaphysics of meaning' a...
August 20, 2016 at 23:08
'Computers outstrip any philosopher or mathematician in marching mechanically through a programmed set of logical maneuvers, but this was only because...
August 20, 2016 at 12:05
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNfGyIW7aHM
August 20, 2016 at 11:18
I already said that! That is what you were responding to already. You said 'could we create an artificial "I"', and I said, 'you would have to know wh...
August 20, 2016 at 10:35
It is true a priori.
August 20, 2016 at 10:12
These are two different arguments. I was referring to Hume's articulation of the is/ought problem, not his assertion that reason is the slave of the p...
August 20, 2016 at 09:56
if you think it's a dodge, how are you going to answer the question? X-)
August 20, 2016 at 09:12
When you say 'in the sense that a human is a being' - what other sense is there? Pick up a dictionary or an encyclopedia, and look up 'being' as a nou...
August 20, 2016 at 08:31
I still say, that if you think of it in terms of whether the device or neural network, or whatever, is actually a being, then you have answered the qu...
August 20, 2016 at 07:26
There is a famous New Age book called The Secred which made it's author a multi-millionaire. I don't believe in that kind of woo, either, but I don't ...
August 20, 2016 at 06:04
The 'slave to the passions' is a different subject. The passage I was referring to is this one: Emphasis added. The underlined phrases are the key to ...
August 20, 2016 at 05:55
The reson I 'don't understand' your posts are that they are totally unintelligible, they don't, and never have, made a lick of sense. The sooner every...
August 20, 2016 at 00:27
deleted. D'oh.
August 19, 2016 at 23:53
Awareness of the distinction between objective and subjective is very much bound up with the rise of modernism; I don't think that the medievals or ea...
August 19, 2016 at 23:33
Yes - but then one would fall foul of the thought police. You know this how? You confidently proclaim what others do and do not realise, do and do not...
August 19, 2016 at 21:57
Is the device a being? Because if it were, then you would have to recognize its rights to self-determination - you would have to ask it how it felt ab...
August 19, 2016 at 11:23
1 The words of the Teacher, a son of David, king in Jerusalem: 2 “Meaningless! Meaningless!” says the Teacher. “Utterly meaningless! Everything is mea...
August 19, 2016 at 11:15
The first paragraph contains the gist!
August 19, 2016 at 10:57
I didn't care too much for S's conception of will or his notorious pessimism but I thought the 'vorstellung' was profound.
August 19, 2016 at 10:34
Hey I agree that the Magee videos are great, I'm definitely a Magee fan. I have his Schopenhauer on all my devices.
August 19, 2016 at 10:21
actually the Magee videos are very stodgy....black and white TV, men wearing ties speaking in very BBC accents. I like them but it would never draw a ...
August 19, 2016 at 10:09
The forum before the one that just died - the old forum that got absorbed into Ask2Know - had an excellent collection of Youtube videos on philosophy....
August 19, 2016 at 08:51
I find most of the new atheists are engaged in 'straw God' arguments - they take what is the most caricatured version of the idea, namely that of youn...
August 19, 2016 at 08:47
My orientation was very much 'seeker' - convinced there was a 'higher state' which certain very special and rare individuals had realised. Very 60's. ...
August 18, 2016 at 09:57
I hear you. Hadn't thought about it from that perspective.
August 17, 2016 at 11:21
I think something like 'the great chain of being' - bearing in mind that particular terminology, and the Western model of it, are particular instances...
August 17, 2016 at 08:48
By the 'nature of order', one might be referring to, for example, the sequence of prime numbers or other such intellectual objects and formal laws, wh...
August 16, 2016 at 10:53
Went upstairs to watch TV only to hear f****ing Brian Cox declaring that 'the whole marvellous universe is just built out of very simple building bloc...
August 16, 2016 at 10:41
I know a lot of what I say is non-PC and it gets on a lot of people's nerves, but I don't have a tenure to defend or anything in print. I spend my day...
August 16, 2016 at 10:33
You're reading many things into my posts that I never say. Any religious philosophy would say that 'nature doesn't contain it's own cause' (although, ...
August 16, 2016 at 10:06