You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

In: Mysticism  — view comment
Well when I took it, it was still legal! (Now I'm showing my age.)
September 23, 2016 at 06:36
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Not for nothing that Timothy Leary call his book 'The Politics of Esctacy'.
September 23, 2016 at 06:22
the latter contains this gem:
September 23, 2016 at 05:51
I've got that book. Are you sure the author is Catholic? I have a strong feeling it is actually by Stephan Hoeller. @Hoo - will respond later, I'm *su...
September 23, 2016 at 04:15
As I said before, it's 'the finger and the moon', i.e. 'religion' is the sign. And religion doesn't have a single meaning, either, there is brutal, re...
September 23, 2016 at 03:26
I don't believe in a Jehovah.
September 23, 2016 at 02:50
In: Mysticism  — view comment
I don't know! I don't have any particularly ideas here, it's just an observation. I do notice that at Dharmawheel, where I also post, there is essenti...
September 23, 2016 at 02:20
In: Mysticism  — view comment
That's as good a statement of cultural relativism as we're likely to see! To bastardise Voltaire, 'though I may disagree with what you say, I see no r...
September 23, 2016 at 01:52
Mormons believe a lot of crazy stuff in my view. When a schoolchild, we used to sing Jerusalem, by Blake - stirring hymn, but never believed for an in...
September 23, 2016 at 01:15
My thoughts exactly. incidentally, I have told this anecdote before - some years back, there was a sensational news story that an archeologist claimed...
September 23, 2016 at 00:42
In: Mysticism  — view comment
This is in line with the 'culture of consent' i.e. the only criterion for ethical worth in sexual relationships is consent and mutual enjoyment, the o...
September 22, 2016 at 23:43
In: Mysticism  — view comment
'Integral spirituality' is Ken Wilber's terminology. Not that I'm a Wilber acolyte, but it's an indicator of a genre.
September 22, 2016 at 22:44
In: Mysticism  — view comment
It is an approach that would be quite compatible with today's 'integral spirituality'.
September 22, 2016 at 21:19
In: Mysticism  — view comment
A paragraph from Hegel and the Hermetic Tradition which captures many important ideas in mysticism: (Y) Bolds and come comments added. source
September 22, 2016 at 11:40
But then, what drew me to Buddhism was the 'finger pointing at the moon' analogy - that any religion is simply a signpost, or a finger pointing at the...
September 22, 2016 at 08:42
Well, it is true that if what even a fraction of what is said about religions in today's world were actually true, then you would have to be intellect...
September 22, 2016 at 08:41
Thank heavens for small mercies. X-) I am sure 'religion' recognizes that, in fact, is built around it. Certainly, that insight is often corrupted and...
September 22, 2016 at 04:00
Relate that to OP. From the viewpoint of secular philosophy the Christian story can only be understood symbolically. But, talking in philosophical ter...
September 22, 2016 at 01:51
My whole interest in the question grew out of a rejection of organised religion, but what has happened in Western culture has changed my attitude. I t...
September 22, 2016 at 01:18
To those who believe there really is a life beyond, and that you do in this life has consequences, then it's no longer a hypothetical question but som...
September 22, 2016 at 01:13
Trying to rationalize the basis of the Christian religion on the basis of 'what I can figure out' is surely a definition of futility.
September 22, 2016 at 01:04
If you abandon all faith then you would not be able to use currency or insurance. Such conventions only operate on the basis of faith. When the stockm...
September 21, 2016 at 10:22
I suppose I should add, in respect of Hume's observations about the divergence of facts and values, that this still holds, in fact more so now than ev...
September 21, 2016 at 04:40
It is a false dichotomy, insofar as what is objective and what is subjective are inter-connected - they're not ultimately separable. Within convention...
September 21, 2016 at 04:32
Wasn't it Thomas Jefferson who embarked on a project to 'naturalise' the life of Jesus? There's a summary here, saying that he was reticent about disc...
September 21, 2016 at 03:50
What I said is, if you're not wedded to physicalism - physicalism being that belief that reality is solely physical - then you're not inclined to rule...
September 21, 2016 at 03:25
In: Mysticism  — view comment
I hear you but I think an awful lot gets written off nowadays against 'judge not....'
September 21, 2016 at 02:05
In: Mysticism  — view comment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lives_in_the_Shadow_with_J._Krishnamurti I agree with the point about gnosticism not being a single school, or even a sc...
September 21, 2016 at 01:18
In: Mysticism  — view comment
these "accidents of biochemistry" are very abstract and distant from the world I live in... Ask the proverbial man-in-the-street what is the basis of ...
September 21, 2016 at 00:37
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Apologies, written in haste. My first encounters with the literature of mysticism, were with the Indian 'advaitins'. Advaita is a philosophical school...
September 21, 2016 at 00:01
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Second the above. I went to some of the Science and Nonduality (SAND) conferences in California - some of the speakers were genuine, but there was a l...
September 20, 2016 at 23:39
In: Mysticism  — view comment
That it is a discussion of exceedingly subtle matters. Personally I find it a bit unseemly. Sartres' dissertations on alienation and meaningless are d...
September 20, 2016 at 23:27
In: Mysticism  — view comment
From the quoted passage above: 'For so long as someone is not equal to this truth, he cannot understand my words'.
September 20, 2016 at 22:46
Regarding whether God exists - belief in God isn't, or ought not to be, a proposition about something that exists. It is an interpretation of the natu...
September 20, 2016 at 21:17
There's been a lot of work done over the last few centuries by critical scholarship, which re-assessed the sources, the chronology of the accounts, an...
September 20, 2016 at 21:09
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Some Meister Eckhardt quotes: 'He is your being, but you are not his' 'The eye with which I see God, is the same eye as with which God sees me'.
September 20, 2016 at 11:28
Kantian - 'thoughts without content are empty, intuitions without concepts are blind'. Regarding 'all states being material', explain this: a set of m...
September 20, 2016 at 10:25
Philosophy is neither religion nor science. It drops you at the border. Incidentally, I differ with the first line in the OP Existence (metaphysics) T...
September 20, 2016 at 10:01
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Sartre was a highly educated man, heir to European philosophy, and he well understood subjects such as the nature of being, in a way that the facile '...
September 20, 2016 at 09:32
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Sartre has got zero to do with mysticism. If you wanted an anti-mystic, you'd be hard pressed to find a better example. Hell is other people, and all ...
September 20, 2016 at 08:08
In: Mysticism  — view comment
From the SEP entry on Sartre:
September 20, 2016 at 06:50
In: Mysticism  — view comment
The trouble is, in this context, that Sartre and Nietzsche were avowed atheists. (I wrestled with Being and Nothingness as an undergraduate, I literal...
September 20, 2016 at 02:17
In: Mysticism  — view comment
The difference is that in Christian thought, the idea of 'becoming God' would be a grave heresy. There is the idea of theosis, or divine union, but th...
September 20, 2016 at 01:35
In: Mysticism  — view comment
ahem, I think not. He got charged with heresy for saying much less. 'Divine union' is not the same as 'apotheosis'.
September 20, 2016 at 00:44
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Right. But in all seriousness, it is a discipline, and it does have roadmaps and routes, even though from the outside it seems like complete anarchy. ...
September 19, 2016 at 23:51
In: Mysticism  — view comment
That's why it's called 'mystical'! X-)
September 19, 2016 at 22:56
In: Mysticism  — view comment
That's a fair question so I'll stop being facetious and try and explain it. The problem is going to be that to try and explain it, I will have to appe...
September 19, 2016 at 11:11
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Old title but (like the title) a perennial.
September 19, 2016 at 10:37
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Non-conceptual is what 'the direct path' is about, and of course we can't 'make sense' of it, because to make sense of it, is to try and process it in...
September 19, 2016 at 10:04
In: Mysticism  — view comment
I really hate to pick nits, but it's not about 'feeling'. Mystical insight might be accompanied by feeling but it is first and foremost noetic. //edit...
September 19, 2016 at 08:58