You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

The point I’m trying to articulate is a very general one. As I said, I think ‘intelligibility’ had a specific meaning, and a different meaning, in pre...
November 18, 2018 at 03:40
I had the feeling it was connected. When you ask 'specifically, what are cognitive distortions', then I think the answer is something along the lines ...
November 18, 2018 at 03:14
And I’ve responded in various other threads. I think it takes a real effort to get out of your own head-space. In my case, one key element became phys...
November 18, 2018 at 01:49
by persuading you to identify with them.
November 18, 2018 at 01:36
I think philosophy always had an element of therapy to it. In fact (I might have mentioned this before) the very word 'therapy' is derived from a Jewi...
November 17, 2018 at 22:37
It's worth noticing that 'intelligibility' has a very different meaning in what we might call classical philosophy than it has in the modern world. Th...
November 17, 2018 at 21:51
Leaving Aside your Questions, You Don't need to Randomly Capitalise Words. Do you believe in God, or is that a software glitch? An article about the p...
November 17, 2018 at 21:32
*
November 17, 2018 at 07:25
TLP It's also significant that this is the sequence of aphorisms that ends with the one that is often said to be reminiscent of Zen: cf: The Buddha //...
November 17, 2018 at 04:20
I will try and enlarge on that. What I have in mind, is the role of the brain (or mind, mind/brain, whatever) in synthesising perception and data in t...
November 17, 2018 at 02:24
none of which contradicts what I meant to say, but I will have to enlarge on it when not typing on an iphone. (Incidentally, as it happens, I’m workin...
November 17, 2018 at 01:32
There was an insightful essay years ago on BBC’s online magazine (can’t find it since) about the powerful appeal of Inception, Matrix, and other such ...
November 16, 2018 at 23:20
It’s a metaphor with obvious appeal in our technological age. Nothing more. But it would suit the technocracy if a lot of people were to believe it.
November 16, 2018 at 09:21
:ok:
November 16, 2018 at 09:13
I think your post is based on a fundamental mistake about what philosophers, prior to modernity, thought that science was. Aristotle’s physics was not...
November 16, 2018 at 07:05
But with no light at the end of the tunnel.
November 13, 2018 at 09:10
Goodnight. And FWIW I think the depth of your posts has improved considerably over the years. ;-)
November 13, 2018 at 08:34
:up:
November 13, 2018 at 07:18
What motivated my initial interest in philosophy was the possibility of spiritual illumination or enlightenment. Actually when I first went to Uni it ...
November 13, 2018 at 06:56
Splendid post. I had pasted a quote from earlier on in the thread in my scrapbook and compared it to a snippet from Aristotle. Although it could be st...
November 13, 2018 at 06:40
Quite. Shouldn’t be forgotten that the rejection of metaphysics was a characteristic of both Protestantism - Luther called Aristotle a ‘son of the dev...
November 13, 2018 at 06:33
We determine what symbols mean. They have no intrinsic meaning. That is why they can't be physical - because a physical mark is not capable of meaning...
November 10, 2018 at 22:32
That is really illuminating and useful post, thank you. I had read one or two papers from Meillassoux in years past, mainly due to promptings from thi...
November 10, 2018 at 22:22
OK, I’ll re-phrase - ‘a stance which a great many people advocate’.
November 09, 2018 at 21:55
The context is a thread about idealism, and then about idealism as opposed to scientific realism. It wasn’t really about reductionism as such, so how ...
November 09, 2018 at 21:42
Done that. ‘Philosophy of Matter, Keith Campbell, University of Sydney. HD for essay on Lucretius.
November 09, 2018 at 21:26
Sign on the door says 'philosophy forum'. :smile: Except that science still does frequently don the (lab) coat of moral authority.
November 09, 2018 at 21:18
Right - this is the point that I have realised also. When we imagine the world from the viewpoint of scientific realism, then we just picture an empty...
November 09, 2018 at 20:00
:up:
November 09, 2018 at 19:46
That is solipsism, not idealism. It is one of the consequences of Cartesianism, that I can only be certain of *my* own existence. Here's a passage in ...
November 09, 2018 at 07:16
It would be hell. I think the spiritual meaning of ‘eternity’ is not that one lives forever in physical form, but that the real nature of the human be...
November 09, 2018 at 06:43
The thing which most realists don’t see, is how the human perspective is smuggled into their worldview and then forgotten. Realism speaks of ‘the vast...
November 09, 2018 at 02:20
Agree that the world is in some basic sense mind-created. But the way I now put it, is that there is an irreducibly subjective pole, or to put it anot...
November 08, 2018 at 20:58
Apparently Mattis hates that nickname, and actually he's been a beacon of sanity in the schemozle of the Trump White House.
November 08, 2018 at 10:38
You all seen the guy who’s replacing Sessions? 6’4”, shaven head, looks like a cage fighter. Trump wants to sick him on Mueller. It’s about the only l...
November 08, 2018 at 09:29
I think you’re a mistake in regarding the noumenal and the phenomenal as radically distinct or utterly other. My view of Kant’s claim about things in ...
November 07, 2018 at 06:57
It’s a tremendously important point. The whole notion of objectivity and exactness is basic to the success of science. But it’s the attempt to extend ...
November 05, 2018 at 22:45
That is at least partially due to the definition of modern science, in particular. It’s here that the emphasis on precisely quantifiable data becomes....
November 05, 2018 at 21:20
Right. Then you get a 'sufficiently advanced method of brain scanning' - but some experts cast doubt on their veracity. In the end, the experts are de...
November 05, 2018 at 10:24
You could feed me anchovies, and I could say ‘yum’, hundreds of times, whilst actually hating them. Whereas there’s no way I could lie about being 6” ...
November 05, 2018 at 09:25
Knowing that you don’t know something is vastly preferable to thinking you know something you don’t.
November 04, 2018 at 21:51
I believe in liberalism but not scientific materialism.
November 04, 2018 at 20:58
Domains of discourse are just as the name implies - a cultural milieu within which terms and concepts have an agreed meaning such that participants in...
November 04, 2018 at 20:01
Not if they’re explored in the context of a ‘domain of discourse’. The reason they’re ‘inchoate’ is because of the chaotic state of culture.
November 04, 2018 at 19:53
Wasn’t being entirely serious, I must admit, but will always love the story about the lemon juice. :wink:
November 04, 2018 at 09:44
Sam’s problematic revolves around objective validation of something which can only ever be known first-person, that being the reality or otherwise of ...
November 04, 2018 at 09:43
I was criticized on this forum several years back because I suggested that the jailing of the Christian Governor of Jakarta, Ahok, on blasphemy charge...
November 04, 2018 at 02:44
Actually that passage I quoted from Davies was in response to the point in the OP about ‘what is objective is mind-independent’. I know it seems far o...
November 03, 2018 at 22:34
Looks great! Are you relation to Arthur, by any chance? :smile:
November 03, 2018 at 22:01
Fair enough, but it's the tip of an iceberg. In any case, a google search on the etymology of 'objective' yields the following: One point I notice abo...
November 03, 2018 at 21:59