You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

Agree. Really glad to see someone here who appreciates this. Are you familiar with philosopher of science Michel Bitbol? He has some very interesting ...
January 09, 2020 at 06:50
Welcome. I thnk part of the problem is that 'god' has been turned into a concept, a word with a set of historical associations. And as it's mostly ass...
January 09, 2020 at 06:01
There are no facts in Trumpworld.
January 08, 2020 at 04:28
On the noumenal: I actually think Kant's use of the term is rather confused. Early in his career he wrote a thesis on Plato's forms, but then later re...
January 07, 2020 at 10:17
Here:
January 06, 2020 at 23:29
What I mean is, that to say that there's a representation of, or a representation and, is suggestive of representative realism, which is more like Loc...
January 06, 2020 at 22:17
This is Locke’s representative realism, not Kant.
January 06, 2020 at 21:20
That’s because you see it a through the materialist paradigm, that mind is an output of brain. What if there are biological fields (like Sheldrake’s m...
January 06, 2020 at 19:52
Beware the dark side, Luke ;-)
January 05, 2020 at 10:32
:up:
January 05, 2020 at 10:24
To be honest, my initial reaction to this event was not another ‘oh what has Trump done now’. It seemed to me the kind of action that any US President...
January 05, 2020 at 09:49
I voted climate change, but if I had two choices over-population would have been #2.
January 05, 2020 at 09:32
Well, that’s just not so. Maybe you’re not a native English speaker? Buildings and furniture are structures and artefacts. The point is that beings ar...
January 05, 2020 at 07:57
Wouldn't disagree. But I am hoping nevertheless to probe that construction, rather than simply assume it. I am interested in the role of the observing...
January 04, 2020 at 23:49
Oh, I'm sorry, then. I thought this was a philosophical discussion. I will, however, be edified in my newfound knowledge that buildings are beings. So...
January 04, 2020 at 23:01
Don't you think that the issue of the 'hard problem of consciousness' and Chalmer's and Nagel's arguments as to why the natural sciences can't suffici...
January 04, 2020 at 22:55
What I’m arguing is that to place 'beings' on the same plane as 'objects', is to overlook their fundamental nature as beings. But if you ask what it i...
January 04, 2020 at 22:21
Note this qualification in that Wikipedia article: Which is the point I'm making. We do not, in common usage, refer to inanimate things as 'beings' - ...
January 04, 2020 at 20:50
The dictionary is ample evidence for a simple point.
January 04, 2020 at 11:31
:up: You and I are designated 'beings', and buildings are not. It's simple English. You plainly misunderstood the passage you quoted from me. Would yo...
January 04, 2020 at 11:22
You must have misunderstood what I was writing about. In no way was I 'denying empathy'. Maybe read through the previous comments in this thread to se...
January 04, 2020 at 09:35
And which branch of science is primarily concerned with empathy?
January 04, 2020 at 09:06
This goes back to a point I have raised in the past about the etymological derivation of the term 'ontology'. I pointed out that, according to an onli...
January 04, 2020 at 07:21
I never claimed this. I have said 'being' in the noun form refers to living creatures. The noun form - as in ‘a being’ - is not used in relation to in...
January 04, 2020 at 06:58
In English, the word ‘being’ applies to living creatures. Chairs and other object are artifacts, objects, tools, etc, but they’re not designated as ‘b...
January 04, 2020 at 00:11
This is a commentary on Sondland's testimony to the impeachment enquiry adapted from media sources. So, NOs, I'm not going to waste time on bullshit g...
January 03, 2020 at 10:46
Sondland’s overall overheard call from Trump and his subsequent testimony that there was a quid pro quo. In other words Sondland’s presumptions were p...
January 03, 2020 at 10:35
Which was attested by several thousand pages of witness testimony. It's a Ming vase, by the way.
January 03, 2020 at 08:34
All of this was in order to coerce President Zelenksy to announce an investigation into the Bidens so as to undermine his 2020 campaign. So, as always...
January 03, 2020 at 05:52
There's a book called The Case for God, Karen Armstrong, 2009. It's not a book of religious apologetics, but an essay in the history of ideas. She tra...
January 03, 2020 at 04:26
Major NY Times story from a few days back - an inside look at what was happening in the back rooms during Trump’s 84-day illegal hold on Ukraine aid f...
January 03, 2020 at 04:22
*
January 03, 2020 at 04:21
'Common way of putting it 'where? Living creatures are defined as ‘beings’. It would incorrect to describe minerals or manufactured artefacts as 'bein...
January 03, 2020 at 04:18
:up: However, there's something that this glosses over: that if Bob is hit by the branch and injured, he's rushed to hospital and cared for, whereas t...
January 03, 2020 at 01:46
You might have a 'concept of language' but I don't see how that advances understanding of language. It's too multifaceted to reduce to a concept. Perf...
January 02, 2020 at 21:53
Light is not composed of atoms. Regardless of the physical components of experience, there is an element that can’t be understood in physical terms, w...
January 02, 2020 at 21:18
Reason is not a concept, but a faculty, which allows for the development of concepts.
January 02, 2020 at 21:06
Not at all. What does 'supernatural' mean? It means, can't be brought within the ambit of current science, can't be objectively validated or proven or...
January 02, 2020 at 09:33
Burned alive underwater! Must have taken some powerful magic. However it’s false, the burning of heretics didn’t start until many centuries later, med...
January 02, 2020 at 07:20
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
Well, glad we sorted that out!
January 01, 2020 at 22:58
I understand the expression 'sentient beings' to mean creatures endowed with sense. So I would take the expression 'beings' to include all sentient cr...
January 01, 2020 at 22:57
Even in your apparently simple construction, there's something unstated, which is that 'Bob' is an object for Alice, whereas Alice is an object for Bo...
January 01, 2020 at 22:04
‘Miracles are not against nature, only what we know about nature’ ~ St. Augustine.
January 01, 2020 at 20:43
More fool them.
January 01, 2020 at 10:15
Not true. Voters rejected labor on many grounds but climate change hardly figured. (Might have been different had the vote been held now.) But the bac...
January 01, 2020 at 09:25
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
Actually in that reference you give, Pauli says, ironically, that one should no more rack one’s brains about whether something one cannot know exists ...
January 01, 2020 at 08:55
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
Thanks. That was the rhetorical point I was working towards.
January 01, 2020 at 08:27
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
The issue is, why Einstein, and why that question. It's related to a point that Jorn Doe picked up on, but is not really related to this thread, so I ...
January 01, 2020 at 05:25
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
You know that Albert Einstein famously asked that very question. The exact quote is: As recalled by his biographer Abraham Pais. Why did Einstein, of ...
January 01, 2020 at 03:45
Right. Let's all pray for a super-volcano, then. Maybe Yellowstone. It might make a lot of North America uninhabitable for a century or so, but consid...
January 01, 2020 at 03:42