You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

Well, I’m starting to hope that Sander’s turnout is going to be a factor, and that a large number of would-be Trump voters will stay home because even...
February 24, 2020 at 00:56
He's a threat, because he constantly attacks the legal system and uses the justice department in the pursuit of his own political ends (which are his ...
February 23, 2020 at 13:54
If you can't see it, there's no point trying to explain it.
February 23, 2020 at 10:34
In anthropology and other forms of study of culture, there are etic and emic perspectives. Etic perspectives function within the domain of discourse, ...
February 23, 2020 at 09:41
I'm interested in the supporting dogmas for this assertion.
February 23, 2020 at 09:35
I think that's pretty right. We can't 'experience a priori truths by our senses' because by definition, they're not what Kant called 'sensible truths'...
February 23, 2020 at 09:27
What if it’s not a ‘collapse of a sector’ but a legitimate redistribution of resources? Why should shareholders profit from healthcare? They’re arguab...
February 23, 2020 at 07:39
Bloomberg’s performance the other night was profoundly depressing. I think it really damaged his cred. As an outsider, I had been hoping that he would...
February 23, 2020 at 05:55
Well, that's very interesting, but my brief perusal of Christina Schefer's books leads be to believe that they're untranslated, and also exceedingly e...
February 22, 2020 at 22:14
I don't know if they're 'great' in many respects at all. Philosophy, philo-sophia, was originally grounded in something like 'saving wisdom' i.e. an i...
February 22, 2020 at 06:41
The problem is your framing of the issue. And it's far from clear that those who describe themselves as 'religious' themselves would agree that this i...
February 22, 2020 at 06:36
The comment that provoked the firestorm was that dark matter is a metaphysical conjecture. Terrible thing to say. Which is the subject of Hempel’s dil...
February 14, 2020 at 21:43
I rest my case.
February 14, 2020 at 11:27
Your concern is touching, but I get by.
February 14, 2020 at 11:26
This is a ‘philosophy forum’. I think it’s interesting that all of this grew out of my suggestion that the nature and existence of dark matter might b...
February 14, 2020 at 10:45
The ontology of the probability wave and so also the atom is still one of the outstanding problems of physics, and the particle accelerator has still ...
February 14, 2020 at 10:34
‘Abductive reasoning (also called abduction, abductive inference, or retroduction) is a form of logical inference which starts with an observation or ...
February 14, 2020 at 10:12
:up: And the reason for that is not a matter for physics.
February 14, 2020 at 09:45
The purported EFFECTS can be observed. But dark matter itself cannot be and hasn’t been observed. This is fact.
February 14, 2020 at 09:44
In the paradigm cases that have been brought up - radio waves, wind, and germs - there is a clear correlation in theory and observation between cause ...
February 14, 2020 at 09:37
Ask a stupid question.....
February 14, 2020 at 09:04
Yes, there's the question of 'the nature of perception and observation' but that is not what is at issue in the discussion of dark matter. That sounds...
February 14, 2020 at 07:39
You're confusing two kinds of explanation here. Of course one can question the nature of observation itself - that is the task of philosophical analys...
February 14, 2020 at 05:49
I just can't help being reminded of epicycles and crystal spheres. The placebo effect doesn't have a naturalistic explanation, or at least a physical ...
February 14, 2020 at 05:46
Science has no idea what 'it' is, or even if 'it' exists, and it's never observed any such thing. That would be a huge headline! Dark matter is used t...
February 14, 2020 at 05:14
Mistaken. In the case of radio waves, wind, and germs, we have a precise physical description of these, even if they're not visible to the naked eye. ...
February 14, 2020 at 03:17
Data collected from radio-telescopes of distant stellar objects is direct - you're seeing the light waves or radio waves emitted by the object. It's n...
February 14, 2020 at 01:33
I don't think that in before modernity it was ever assumed that suffering was something that could be completely avoided. If you can imagine what our ...
February 13, 2020 at 23:49
The scene in the oval office after the Barr interview: https://thumbor.forbes.com/thumbor/960x0/https%3A%2F%2Fblogs-images.forbes.com%2Fdanidiplacido%...
February 13, 2020 at 22:53
Check out this OP. Meanwhile, sudden outbreak of sanity from an unexpected source: https://nyti.ms/2tVh4jH] Trump's meddling in the judiciary is yet a...
February 13, 2020 at 22:25
Coming into existence, then. Hard to imagine how this could be observed, isn't it? Or what kind of physical theory could account for that? I think tha...
February 13, 2020 at 22:03
They have *never* been observed. There's an inference that they must exist because of their effect, but nobody has a clue about their nature. Dark mat...
February 13, 2020 at 19:30
Not sure that I can. It’s a one-sentence paraphrase of an argument I read about but I don’t have enough information to elaborate on it. But it makes i...
February 13, 2020 at 09:59
‘If you’re a star, you can grab ‘em by the pussy. But if you’re a President, you can grab ‘em by the Justice Department.’
February 13, 2020 at 06:41
but no. that's the least real aspect of experience. basically you're appealing to common sense. I value hedonic experiences like anyone else, but they...
February 12, 2020 at 10:48
You're writing from the perspective of ego - one ego amongst others - which is perfectly natural in an individualist culture. And the basic orientatio...
February 12, 2020 at 10:03
Do not feed the troll.
February 12, 2020 at 09:39
I had drafted a response along those lines but Jamalrob beat me to it. So, you're basically against those things which most differentiate humans from ...
February 11, 2020 at 08:28
It’s not supported by Plush Forums.
February 11, 2020 at 06:18
:up: :cry:
February 11, 2020 at 05:45
The distinction is fundamental to Kant. Sorry, no, that was unclear on my part. Yes, Kant used the term 'transcendent' to mean 'beyond the scope of em...
February 11, 2020 at 02:56
I don't see how anyone can watch that Helsinki performance and still believe that Trump is acting in American interests. Not possible. As for the Demo...
February 11, 2020 at 01:17
Matters of law, and the abuse thereof, are not decided by public elections, but by the penal code. Those who flout the penal code ought to be subject ...
February 10, 2020 at 23:59
'"I call all cognition transcendental that is occupied not so much with objects but rather with our mode of cognition of objects insofar as this is to...
February 10, 2020 at 23:57
But you say: What I said was you’re misrepresenting transcendental idealism, in that you don’t convey an understanding of what Kant means by ‘transcen...
February 10, 2020 at 22:39
I think that philosophically, the question comes down to the rejection of the possibility of intentional action at a fundamental ontological level. On...
February 10, 2020 at 22:28
I think it's generally assumed that in the absence of the purportedly intentional act of creation by a divine intelligence, then the alternative must ...
February 10, 2020 at 19:27
there's a basic point of Kant's transcendental arguments that I think you have missed. This is the idea that the intellectual faculties which render e...
February 10, 2020 at 09:26
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBtsNNXjBPw Fake news, eh? I suppose it must be, in the alt universe.
February 10, 2020 at 07:25