You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

But the challenge is, how can any kind of 'either/or' thinking or logical argument, in general, be explained in terms of the kinds of physical causati...
May 31, 2023 at 08:36
May 31, 2023 at 08:17
I actually offered an argument, not an 'intuitive preconception'. If you would like to address the argument, then I might respond.
May 31, 2023 at 08:13
The wave particle duality may well be an heuristic device, but anyway, doesn’t have any bearing.
May 31, 2023 at 04:15
‘House Rules Committee voted to clear the way for a debate on the plan on Wednesday,’ - NY Times. First hurdle cleared.
May 31, 2023 at 00:56
@"Fooloso4" - you have said there are no immaterial minds - how would you even go about looking for such a mind (I hesitate to say 'phenomenon')? We h...
May 30, 2023 at 22:36
The Freedom Caucus are vowing to torpedo it - have a listen to the video in this NYT article. I knew there'd be calls for McCarthy's head. Hakeem Jeff...
May 30, 2023 at 22:30
Not what I had in mind. The philosophical question is, how could you account for propostional content in terms of brain-states. The brain-mind identit...
May 30, 2023 at 22:13
What about the computer you're writing this on? The house you're sitting in while writing it? The products you use every moment of every day? How were...
May 30, 2023 at 21:59
Agree. I also think that rationality is often deprecated by modern philosophy, due to the animosity towards the idea of innate abilities on the part o...
May 30, 2023 at 11:44
I agree, with the caveat that ‘truth’ ought to be replaced with ‘objective fact’ or ‘measurable outcome’ as the sole arbiter of reality. However I als...
May 30, 2023 at 09:43
Pretty darned close. I first learned about Kant in a 1955 book, The Central Philosophy of Buddhism, T R V Murti, which draws many comparisons between ...
May 30, 2023 at 08:11
Yes, I do see the point. Kind of a placeholder for when nobody’s around, as the limerick says. But I don't think you need to introduce a spooky mind-a...
May 30, 2023 at 08:04
Yes, well what ‘everything’ do you have in mind when you say that?
May 30, 2023 at 07:33
Such ideas are not remote in principle from various formulations of panentheism or the kinds of cosmo-psychism found in Advaita Vedanta and is also no...
May 30, 2023 at 07:08
The brain is undoubtedly the most complex phenomenon known to science - but that is not the point. The point is, there are philosophical objections to...
May 30, 2023 at 03:03
But that is reductive physicalism, which I'm constitutionally averse to. The argument against it is that it somehow has to posit that these neuologica...
May 30, 2023 at 02:21
However, the rational intellect is capable of grasping purely abstract ideas, and even using them to construct novel inventions, such as computers.
May 29, 2023 at 23:14
I don't agree with others here that information can be thought of as the raw material of existence, because the word itself is polysemic - it has many...
May 29, 2023 at 22:57
The quote I provided summarises his view - which is why I provided it. I know it seems incredible, but there it is. It is the view that David Chalmer'...
May 29, 2023 at 22:30
That is the whole point of the thought-experiment. It's an argument against reductive physicalism. Compare it to this statement: So Dennett is arguing...
May 29, 2023 at 22:13
There is a factual difference between 'data' and 'information'. 'Data is an individual unit that contains raw materials which do not carry any specifi...
May 29, 2023 at 21:46
Data is not built, it is the raw material. What is built is interpretation, what the data means - that is the difference between data and information....
May 29, 2023 at 10:05
the answer I was looking for was: you can’t find it, because it’s not there. The perspective is always outside.
May 29, 2023 at 08:59
Ah, and follow-up question - where, in the objective data, is ‘the perspective’?
May 29, 2023 at 08:53
You win the lucky door prize (or you would, if I had one to give out :yikes: )
May 29, 2023 at 08:52
There is something that ‘the observer‘ brings to bear, without which it is meaningless to talk of distance, duration or scale. And without distance, d...
May 29, 2023 at 08:48
There is something that the observer brings to bear, without which it is meaningless to talk of distance, duration or scale. And without those it is a...
May 29, 2023 at 03:51
But the point of the hard problem of consciousness argument is precisely that no amount of objective analysis can capture the first-person experience....
May 28, 2023 at 21:38
That the meaning could be separated from the symbolic form, on the basis that the same number can be represented in many symbolic forms.
May 28, 2023 at 21:33
Update - agreement reached, sent to Congress https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/27/us/politics/debt-limit-deal.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSourc...
May 28, 2023 at 02:25
Still no agreement. McCarthy is making noises about ‘progress’ and ‘optimism’ but the hardliners in the GOP back-office are still holding out. I would...
May 28, 2023 at 02:12
Daniel Dennett is Chalmer’s foil. He puts it like this: ’ The objection to Dennett remains that no third-person account of even something as simple as...
May 28, 2023 at 00:38
Glad someone noticed it! As you may recall, I myself have disputed the necessity of positing mind-at-large. The way I put it is simply that, if you ar...
May 28, 2023 at 00:29
I think some formulation of Aristotelian matter-form dualism might be quite in keeping with anything that science turns up. Remember, it doesn’t posit...
May 28, 2023 at 00:21
I’ve found this précis to be quite accurate: Further to that, scientific method embodies a great many axioms, at least some of which are metaphysical,...
May 27, 2023 at 23:54
Subjective and relative.
May 27, 2023 at 23:28
Isn’t Aristotle (and his teacher) one of the main reasons the ‘scientific revolution’ happened in Europe and not India or China? (Excellent undergrad ...
May 27, 2023 at 23:00
Unless they turn out to be fallacious. Ideas have consequences.
May 27, 2023 at 09:23
I got that. It should be added that while speculation about the next life was never encouraged, it was also understood that, should one not practice o...
May 27, 2023 at 08:43
It’s not a defense if common-sense realism. It’s an admonition that speculative views are not conducive to living the holy life, which is the aim of t...
May 27, 2023 at 06:54
May 27, 2023 at 01:25
It's a precis of a chapter in Philosophy as a Way of Life. N?g?rjuna said that all spiritual teachings are like a stick you use to poke the fire. When...
May 27, 2023 at 01:10
Your background understanding of the nature of the world will have a bearing on your practice. If you accept the materialist attitude that the Univers...
May 26, 2023 at 23:19
Right. See https://www.jstor.org/stable/3654247
May 26, 2023 at 23:00
Of course not, but it has been widely observed that his ideas were precursor to the discovery of both evolutionary theory and DNA.
May 26, 2023 at 22:55
Try googling Aristotle and DNA....you may be surprised....
May 26, 2023 at 22:37
:up: Yes, that was an eye-opening excerpt, but not surprising. The military-industrial complex has Washington on a string. The thought has often occur...
May 26, 2023 at 22:23
I tried making the point earlier in this thread that the 'idea of the One' in Greek philosophy is not something that is amenable to discursive analysi...
May 26, 2023 at 22:23
No object without subject. That’s my final offer. :wink: Pinter goes on to make the case that without subjects, there are no facts. Facts are not self...
May 26, 2023 at 21:51