You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

_db

Comments

I might have already asked this question, but are there any KOTOR fans here? I just started my fifth play through of the series. Some of the best game...
October 19, 2016 at 04:55
And during a large sequence in the former half of the twentieth century, it looked as though fascism was to become the dominant form of government on ...
October 19, 2016 at 04:10
Yes, I suppose I agree then. Thank you for clarifying. Antinatalism is indeed an ethical position and not a rational hypothetical.
October 19, 2016 at 04:03
I'm not sure if I follow what you are saying here, Willow. Why call material arguments for antinatalism shallow? If suffering exists, and we apply a v...
October 19, 2016 at 03:23
I try to make a distinction between religion as a cultural and social phenomenon and religious philosophy, like theology, eschatology, soterieology, e...
October 19, 2016 at 00:00
The good is sentient welfare, as viewed through the eyes of sentients themselves.
October 18, 2016 at 21:34
Fuck Richard Dawkins, the intolerant dumbass. Entertaining story.
October 18, 2016 at 07:00
Just because they don't work doesn't mean they aren't candidates for morality. They don't work, not because they aren't good, but because there's some...
October 18, 2016 at 04:54
Probably because we are able to conceive of realities that are not.
October 18, 2016 at 02:39
Please respond with an argument and not just a handwave. I have clearly shown to you how your emphasis on "natural-ness" is derived from a prior appro...
October 18, 2016 at 02:22
No, you also give emotional arguments because you have placed value upon the "natural" state, thus making it susceptible to moral discussion. Nothing ...
October 18, 2016 at 02:01
Yes, but you still have to argue for what the standard should be that we should attempt to strive for. Yes, but why should we consider communal best i...
October 18, 2016 at 01:32
Right, so you are under the framework that what has been done, and what we currently do, is what we ought to continue to do because it's natural and r...
October 18, 2016 at 00:18
I'd like to see you attempt.
October 17, 2016 at 23:32
A scientific belief is a type of philosophical belief. To attempt to separate the two is to drive a nail in a complex and symbiotic relationship betwe...
October 17, 2016 at 23:22
You're conflating hypothetical imperatives with categorical imperatives. You use "rational" (i.e. self-interest) as the motivating reason to adopt a m...
October 17, 2016 at 23:18
Umm...ok?
October 17, 2016 at 20:49
But there needs to be a justification for why humans are special. Perhaps we're special because we can vote or do philosophy. In which case, yes, we s...
October 17, 2016 at 17:31
So you're appealing to the historic application of rights to argue that we ought not to apply these rights to other creatures. "Human", in the case, c...
October 17, 2016 at 17:24
Quite the contrary. If there is any doubt in our mind that an organism is capable of suffering, then it is the skeptic that must provide evidence that...
October 17, 2016 at 16:42
Thank God Chalmers cut his hair.
October 17, 2016 at 08:00
Certainly it would be an ad hominem to attack Schopenhauer's philosophy simply because he was a dick - but it really was the case that good ol' Arthur...
October 17, 2016 at 07:52
Well, sure, but we'll have to have solid evidence to show that they can't feel dread. In any case the murder of a non-human sentient would be similar ...
October 17, 2016 at 05:27
I mean that it is not consistent or rational. Well, because having a feeling mind carries with it certain liabilities, like the capacity to suffer. An...
October 16, 2016 at 22:24
Hot damn, that was a fantastic rant.
October 16, 2016 at 21:24
Yet we can refine our moral considerations and reject the notions of common sense morality that make no sense. But why should we limit these rights to...
October 16, 2016 at 21:03
Or rather, you should see this as your problem and look into why the constraints of common sense morality are largely arbitrary and defenseless.
October 16, 2016 at 20:58
In which case, I would urge us to reconsider our prior beliefs. Ancestor worship is irrational, the deceased are no more and cannot be harmed. Only th...
October 16, 2016 at 19:16
When I say empathy is a starting point, I mean that empathy gives us an initial motivation to help another person. We need no extra justification to h...
October 16, 2016 at 18:56
:-} In any rate, pessimism is an argument for pessimism, so it's not too surprising to myself that there exist people who are discontent with the syst...
October 16, 2016 at 17:37
Oh sure, I agree, it was cliche. But it talked about relevant pessimistic themes that people ordinarily would not look into. Ooooo, a whole planet.......
October 16, 2016 at 02:00
You claim that pessimism is a reaction to modernism, yet pessimism was around long before modern society emerged. The Wisdom of Silenus would have bee...
October 16, 2016 at 00:02
In any case, apo's appeal to the majority doesn't even make sense because it fails to account for other majority views that contradict his own. A curs...
October 15, 2016 at 20:47
Because they weren't capable of doing so. But now humans have entered the stage, and I'm arguing that it's time we put down the mirror of narcissism a...
October 14, 2016 at 17:28
I agree completely. Oh, they're "familiar", just not in the way you're using them. Yes, which is why I asked him to make a thread on this that would r...
October 14, 2016 at 05:31
Point being I think you should make a thread (I meant thread not post) on this because talk of enlightenment vs romanticism, absolutism vs relativity,...
October 14, 2016 at 03:27
Then it's mutual. Because I see no problem with it. Maybe you should actually make a post on this instead of having a assert it every single time.
October 14, 2016 at 03:07
Freud's theories are more often rejected than accepted, but he legacy spawned a quite respectable psychodynamic field that is systematically misinterp...
October 14, 2016 at 02:32
How psychoanalytic of you... :-} Calling people desperate, it seems to me, is a sign of desperation. Right. The goal is what we're arguing out. And I ...
October 14, 2016 at 02:26
Bingo.
October 14, 2016 at 00:30
Yet a scientific ethics does not necessarily satisfy what we perceive to be moral. Tell a person whom you're helping that you're helping them because ...
October 14, 2016 at 00:27
Way to misrepresent my position. Animal starvation is a prime example of what we ought to NOT allow. The only way to cut down on this, and other sorts...
October 14, 2016 at 00:08
No, it's not genocide. It's humanitarianism. Animals cannot take care or advocate for themselves in the way humans can. They live more on instinct tha...
October 13, 2016 at 21:57
You literally just said that our morality should be based on scientific discoveries. Doesn't get any more naturalistic than this. But why? Why should ...
October 13, 2016 at 21:53
Benefit, in this case, is defined as the minimization of harm - harm that is more significant than the harm being applied to the lab rats. The doing/a...
October 13, 2016 at 04:52
It's not absolutism. If lab rats are being used to cure cancer, and this is only way to do it, then I'll support the effort. After all, I am a consequ...
October 13, 2016 at 01:42
No, it's not anthropomorphic nonsense. These penguins are acting in what we perceive to be distinctly human. We should view them as capable of sentien...
October 13, 2016 at 00:38
Species are made of individual organisms that have a family resemblance to each other. They are fluid and ever-changing, yes, but we can organize them...
October 12, 2016 at 22:20
I'm talking about radical restructuring of the ecosystems of the world in the same way first world countries restructure the political and economic st...
October 12, 2016 at 22:12
As soon as someone leaves the realm of the intelligible then they deserve to be ignored. Post-modernism has, by and far, left this realm.
October 12, 2016 at 18:41