You're picking out the wrong thing. And yes, what does "both" mean here? We have a horse moving in 1878. We can pick out pairs of frames, but that hor...
Motion is necessarily what this horse did in 1878: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEqccPhsqgA ...whether the horse "exists at both times" (whatever "...
In what sense? The object is at (1,1) at t=1; therefore the object is at t=1. The object is at (2,1) at t=2; therefore the object is at t=2. So O is b...
Because it's still at (1,1,1). That didn't change. Sure. It's motion from (1,1) to (2,1). That is a change. No, I'm saying it moved from (1,1) to (2,1...
This was explained already. You're confusing a change in place over time with a change in place-and-time over time, the latter of which makes motion i...
I'll try to compress your wrongness here... Luke, you are very confused; possibly hopelessly so. Exhibit A: What the heck is an a-pixel? And what do y...
What do you mean by "no"? You asked me what an increase in x coordinates means in terms of space. I gave you a full specification of the coordinate sy...
Are you trying to ask how the coordinates are laid out in graphics? The coordinates are labeled x and y thusly: (x,y). For any a and b, (a+1,b) is one...
Not sure what you're looking for; if it's analogous, it's the same property. But okay. Given an ordered sequence of values v1, v2, v3, ..., vn, and a ...
Fundamentally speaking, you're trying to illustrate a problem with the notion of a change-over-place as opposed to a change-over-time. Your questions ...
We have some crossed wires here. I've shown that a change in t coordinate does not correspond to a change in color. You respond to that by trying to d...
But why is that relevant? O is at x,y,z,t=(1,1,1,1) and at x,y,z,t=(2,1,1,2). A change in time coordinate here from t=1 to t=2 results in a change in ...
t is irrelevant; it doesn't matter if you "keep it constant" or not. Banno's image doesn't change over time. What gave you the idea that it means that...
There's a lot of repetition here so I'm going to cull my responses down to focus. No, it refers to a change in degree of difference of the color over ...
I have not used that phrase in this thread. Reading through your post, the only match I get to what you might be referring to is the fact that I said ...
Sure. Using x,y,z,t coordinates, A=(1,1,1,1), B=(2,1,1,1), C=(1,1,1,2), D=(2,1,1,2). A to B is a change in place. A to C is a change in time. A to D i...
Yes. Contrast change-over-place now with change-over-time. Forget the concept for a moment and look at those those two phrases. In the phrases, what's...
Because it has nothing to do with the claim you're objecting to. Metaphorical motion is not motion; literal motion is motion. I repeat the question......
And likewise it's your responsibility to ask a sensible question, not mine. The question you asked is invalid: I live on a hill. There is a neighbor d...
Depends on what you want to ask, but it certainly isn't the question of how I can do what I do not actually do. I'm certainly not literally walking le...
Best I can tell that's illusory. I'm just calling the entire array the image, and referring to the colors of pixels at specific locations in the image...
That's the wrong question. Certainly you don't think when I "move from left to right", I'm actually walking on my monitor along that path, right? I do...
Non-sequitur. The pixels on the left of "the image" are not the same pixels as the pixels on the right of "the image". But there's not just a differen...
You don't even understand the point (I can say that with the hindsight of reading your entire post... oh boy, is it broken). The point was an extensio...
I don't see how either of those things follow. If I discover a new route to work, I believe it to be a new route to work. Not even remotely a contradi...
Revision: In the ordinary sense (of folk language games, of the type we would play when we say "the table is solid"), "R murdered W" can only be true ...
Argument: Counter: In the ordinary sense (of folk language games, of the type we would play when we say "the table is solid"), "R murdered W" can only...
I'm not sure I understand your question. When you claim that it's obvious that thinking is involved, to what are you referring? If you're referring to...
I think you have this backwards. According to Isaacian theory of truth, truth is determined by community beliefs. If truth is determined by community ...
Sufficient to warrant Michael's belief. Michael, btw, is not a community. That is not the task at hand; it cannot be. Michael can't establish Isaacian...
All I'm arguing is that your notion that T is just more J fails to describe what T is in regards to JTB. How you apply that to your understanding of d...
But "truth" does not (generally) describe justification in the first place. It describes a state of affairs. I can describe what must the case (i.e., ...
Correct. The criteria for truth (for claims such as the ones being discussed) is that some state of affairs is as described by the proposition. Consid...
Yes. T is a description of a state of affairs. I'm having severe problems parsing what you mean here (a positive declaration, that you're arguing the ...
There would be if you responded to the points rather than dredging up drama. The "what I'm saying" being this?: ...that bold being yours? Are you sure...
The principle of charity only calls for a reading of a speaker's statement in the most rational way possible; it does not call for fantasizing. What y...
Here: You were very explicit not only in saying this, but in specifically saying that you were saying it. "The claim presumes x" is an anthropomorphic...
Maybe you're being fuzzy with your concepts? Both "it's raining" and "the actual weather condition" are asserted to be beliefs. Presumably we have "di...
Just slipping in here. This was considered as a thought experiment in Everett's paper "The Theory of the Universal Wavefunction"; in particular the in...
Rewind... we have this: Paraphrased, "It's raining" is hocus. "What's happening outside my window" is pocus. Hocus can't be pocus because I don't have...
Not without begging the question. What model? You've given me nothing meeting the conditions I've outlined. The flower that is not inside the box? ......
That doesn't explain this: If "it's raining" describes what's inside my skull, and (2) is inside my skull, and atmospheric molecules are inside my sku...
I think you have the wrong room. This is philosophy. The argument clinic is down the hall. Here in the philosophy forum, you made an argument tracing ...
There was no argument in that cartoon... just as there was no argument in the thing it responded to. The cartoon was just a way to respond to the smok...
Bell Inequalities are constraints on probabilities that you would expect given classical probability theory. I gave an example in another thread of a ...
Why? I'm not committed to a QM interpretation, but there's no rule I know of that says that entangled particles can't be separated by a light year. Th...
This is my takeaway from the above paragraph: https://i.ibb.co/1mv6zGj/indexing.png Your argument does nothing for me, because I disagree with the pos...
Your explanation in my mind is defaulting on the promises. The huge distance versus the time scale involved is simply an example of non-locality. You ...
Still not getting what you're saying here, so I'll punt and try my best. There are three parts to this I'll highlight with underlines: ...that is part...
Comments