You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Voyeur

['Member']Joined: February 24, 2017 at 06:27Last active: July 05, 2023 at 19:01None discussions37 comments

Comments

Exactly. This is the point I made previously, glad we can agree. You clearly have a fundamental misunderstanding of the opinion that no amount of disc...
July 05, 2023 at 19:13
An actual decision is useful for more than just it's legal impact. Even concurring and dissenting opinions are valuable barometers for where the legal...
July 01, 2023 at 17:16
The part of the decision you cited lays out EXACTLY how that determination is made. They use the passage you quoted to EXPLICITlY clarify that experie...
July 01, 2023 at 04:49
I look forward to the time when all the esteemed legal scholars in this thread actually engage with the written decision instead of tossing about the ...
June 30, 2023 at 17:06
The reality of causation “needs” no jargon for the exact same reasons I laid out for the cosmos. Yes, but it’s quite a burden for me to be uninteresti...
August 30, 2020 at 05:22
The issue of your claim that the cosmos needs a jargon? A moderate one at that? The same cosmos that existed for billions of years before any sentient...
August 30, 2020 at 04:44
I said they were arbitrary, not accidental. Arbitrary choices can still be deliberate. The “truest” model (whatever that means) is the most pragmatic ...
August 29, 2020 at 16:38
Because it's useful to do so. The language is the abstraction in the first place. "painting" is by definition abstracting. Causes and effects were occ...
August 29, 2020 at 01:21
To a weary traveler, the purpose of trees, or a particular tree, might be shade. To Siddhartha Guatama, a tree serves as the setting for the transform...
August 28, 2020 at 18:15
Purpose is a language game we play to try to make sense of the world. It's useful, and it's value extends only as far as it's usefulness.
August 28, 2020 at 01:19
I am now and was then in agreement. However, that's not a point I was arguing. I focus on the following premise: I disagree with the thought that a th...
August 15, 2020 at 02:15
Clearly. To which I'll reply again:
August 15, 2020 at 01:51
Who said I think it doesn't? Distinction without a difference. But, to avoid a needlessly semantic discussion, use good or bad if you like, it changes...
August 15, 2020 at 00:34
I guess the issue would be with the idea of "intent" being the watchword for "purpose". But I'm content with the idea of decoupling purpose from any s...
August 14, 2020 at 22:37
I don't think the question is about replacement, to me it seems that thermodynamics gives us further context and insight into understanding what ethic...
August 14, 2020 at 16:05
Sure. Doesn't change the point. What makes you think an ethical dimension applies to the possible unraveling of nations?
August 14, 2020 at 15:37
I think my main issue with this line of reasoning is that "purpose" is a construct of rational minds, whereas it's perfectly reasonable to imagine the...
August 14, 2020 at 14:55
Even thermodynamic outcomes are probabilistic, which gives rise to the possibility of chaos. And indeed, in our journey toward higher entropy, the hum...
August 13, 2020 at 19:15
I (mostly) find myself in that same camp, but interestingly: I tend to agree. I tend to disagree. Anyway, whether America is unraveling or not, evolut...
August 13, 2020 at 03:32
"Is" statement "Ought" statement Seems the conversation jumped an awfully large chasm in just two lines. Not saying you aren't allowed, merely asking ...
August 13, 2020 at 03:20
A multi-polar world certainly seems to be an inevitability. Whether that state of affairs carries ethical consequences/connotations... that seems less...
August 12, 2020 at 15:37
Why assume an ethical dimension?
August 12, 2020 at 01:46
"It is a delusional fantasy to think that COLONIAL citizens can stand against the BRITISH government." How unpleasant this idea would have been if it ...
October 13, 2017 at 03:11
At its core, this position is Hobbesian. I'm sure you can see how many Americans would view it as anathema, especially as the US was founded upon core...
October 05, 2017 at 15:37
Ironically, Socrates' unwillingness to part from (his concept of) rational action is one of the most unreasonable things about him. Who else would wil...
October 03, 2017 at 01:55
Where the Greeks strove for a moral duty to reason, Jesus (and later his Christian followers) strove for a moral duty to God. Perhaps both quests are ...
October 02, 2017 at 22:58
I think Plato got the cause and effect wrong, which seems to be what you are pointing out. From that passage in Romans it does appear like Paul is int...
October 02, 2017 at 21:39
Their concepts may not have been exactly congruent to ours, but I would disagree with the idea that Plato did not conceptualize the will. https://en.w...
October 02, 2017 at 20:28
This all rings true (a good example of intuitive emotion governing my purportedly rational response), especially as I am in the middle of "The Righteo...
October 02, 2017 at 19:39
It's interesting because I think it's often overlooked that the point of Zeno's paradoxes isn't to prove that motion is impossible, it's to reduce to ...
February 24, 2017 at 21:08
True, but in order to progress to a logical analysis, I think metaphysically defining our subject is a worthy cause. But in comparison, wouldn't Zeno'...
February 24, 2017 at 21:02
If your statement is true, then the next question is whether motion is a supertask. And if it is, doesn't that mean motion is logically impossible?
February 24, 2017 at 18:33
Depends if you think the sequential distances or steps required to traverse a distance are countably or uncountable infinite. They both have seemingly...
February 24, 2017 at 18:27
I hate to keep stealing my comments from Wikipedia, but there is another interesting version (at least I would call it a version) of Zeno's paradoxes ...
February 24, 2017 at 18:17
I agree that most of the time discussions on this topic tend to descend rather quickly and that’s what I was trying to point out, but you’re quite rig...
February 24, 2017 at 18:11
This, incidentally, does not appear far off from what Zeno was arguing for in the first place. Would you consider yourself a Parmenidean? Maybe a Neo-...
February 24, 2017 at 17:18
Moving back toward the original question of this thread, I'm eager to introduce the notion of Supertasks to the conversation. A great summary with exa...
February 24, 2017 at 06:53