You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Svizec

['Member']Joined: February 17, 2017 at 05:52Last active: February 20, 2017 at 12:411 discussions20 comments

Discussions (1)

Comments

Good luck, because it's a fact. No, it's not. Once you will understand that it's not, you will see the light. I can't help you anymore. Have fun, gent...
February 18, 2017 at 21:37
No. Counting and moving is not the same and can not be considered the same. You can move "through" any number of uncountable points that you wouldn't ...
February 18, 2017 at 21:25
Yes... however the time it needed to travel between those infinitesimally small distances is infinitesimally short as well. That's why when you "add" ...
February 18, 2017 at 17:59
Ok I'll try one more time. I am not talking about moving through physical space, like travelling from Earth to Mars. I am only talking about moving in...
February 18, 2017 at 17:39
Ok but what are these coordinates if the movement is just between point (2,0) and (3,0) in real number space. You were mentioning something about Plan...
February 18, 2017 at 17:27
Could you provide an actual example of that? Are you talking about 2 sets of discrete points?
February 18, 2017 at 17:21
You don't think that we can leave Planck constant out of this trip between points 2 and 3 on the real number axis though? If not, are you basically sa...
February 18, 2017 at 17:18
Ok... but did it pass through ANY rational number? Are you saying that it was at point 2 at the beginning and after that it ended at point 3 without p...
February 18, 2017 at 17:10
This is possible if we are talking about discrete sets. It's a bit cheeky definition of distance there, though.
February 18, 2017 at 17:05
I think I need clarification, because I don't know anymore. Suppose that you are right and that motion can only be discrete (this IS what you are argu...
February 18, 2017 at 16:50
I still think we are missing the point though, because the discussion is mostly about a space of numbers, there is nothing quantum or physical in Q or...
February 18, 2017 at 16:39
Counting does not equal movement. Counting can only equal movement if you have a discrete topology (for example when you are explicitely ordered that ...
February 18, 2017 at 16:27
I'm afraid this is the end of the road, Michael. It does matter, you will have to be more precise here and make a solid counter argument. How would yo...
February 18, 2017 at 16:19
I did clarify that I was talking about the Achilles racing turtle paradox, which is not the one from the OP. Are you still claiming that it makes no s...
February 18, 2017 at 15:25
At this point I am not sure which of the Zeno's paradoxes everyone is discussing. I've discussed both anyway. Michael, you are discussing the one from...
February 18, 2017 at 15:23
Ok, I actually forgot to reply to OP. Let's see... So it's a different Zeno's paradox, but logically it's almost identical to the turtle vs Achilles p...
February 18, 2017 at 15:06
I will quote several posts here but I will start with the only thing where I think Michael is wrong. Every other posts he writes is spot on. The Planc...
February 18, 2017 at 14:39
Can you elaborate on this? From what I know, music and its effect on us can be completely scientifically explained. You can play same tune in differen...
February 18, 2017 at 09:40
Yes, I am almost certain that's it. Thank you.
February 17, 2017 at 22:24
Very good question. The problems were not ethical dilemmas or paradoxes of physics. Instead they were presented in a way that we often see these puzzl...
February 17, 2017 at 06:32