More like a Schrodinger's cat is either dead or alive makes more sense than to say it's a combination of the two just because you, as an observer, no ...
Ok, I think I have to admit I was wrong all the time, after all you are two, so the majority wins. But I'll be less sad if you explain me how "...ever...
They just validate their own theories and it's really not that hard to do that. Again, science has to be objective and there are many scientists who d...
He simply says nature isn't material (he literally said that) and in numerous other videos he states that experiments only show that there's aparently...
No, it isn't. Regarding the forces that govern the matter, I actually almost agree with you, except 2 things: 1. You've mentioned space matter curvatu...
Ok, found it. It clearly states: "...the world is entirely immaterial ", "...there is no material, there is no physicality". YOUTUBE: Noam Chomsky Min...
4. There is an immaterial abstract part of the world that actually governs the material world, by laws of physics or chemistry, biology (we don't know...
More or less: Newton didn't exorcise the ghost, he exorcised the machine. ... he (Newton) had a ghost all the way down, wasn't just the mind, but all ...
- 0 evidence for it, tons against. - this is why it is so unscientific to say science can explain everything. Science looks at the brain and say there...
As Noam Chomsky suggests, what if those fields and molecules have a sort of counsciousness? After all, a combination of elements create consciousness,...
Seeking refuge from something silly that denies all my obvious perceptions, feelings ang pure logic? This is the old excuse of materialists when they ...
Could you be more specific about this statement? Science is science, it does not recognize philosophical notion as its basis. It's the same as saying ...
- yes, but when you suggest that thoughts are material and actually everything is matter, you should come up with some really good arguments. All I ha...
- I don't know much about dualism and I do not think that if dualism is wrong. therefore materialism has to be right. - Science, religion, or magic ex...
You confirm my belief: materialists are just atheists whose basic purpose is not science itself, but using science for disproving God. Why did you say...
Materialism did not invent, but appropriated all the elements of science that do not actually belong to it and denies absolutely everything that scien...
I have intelligence, thoughts, purposes, moral values, intentions, perception, feelings, and maybe a soul. In the worst case, I have an illusion that ...
Me neither, but I am searching for arguments for that. I will meditate on this topic and I will write to you if I draw some conclusions. I hope to fin...
Exactly, there are things and notions like finite space or infinite, the beginning with no cause or no beginning at all that gives us plenty of troubl...
Will those future humans invent new science fields that we, ''early humans'', wouldn't be able to comprehend even by being taught? To be more specific...
The lack of understanding in QM comes from the paradoxes of it and from the lack of willingness to admit that the way we're dealing with science from ...
Yes, I have thought about it many times. For example if humans were blind, would we ever think of inventing seeing? My answer to that is actually yes,...
But being present in two universes at the same time is something that makes sense to us, we would understand this state, while a dog cannot understand...
Why I do not agree: I believe that humans or any other super-evolved creature follow the purpose of surviving and fulfill their desires and for this t...
Debating imagination vs desire is irrelevant to the topic, and this is the last time I bring arguments. But first things first. -WRONG EXAMPLE - the c...
I totally agree. But the substance of my question lies exactly in the issue of our capability to comprehend every comprehensible thing of the reality,...
Maybe there's more to he reality than physical and abstract. Maybe there are things incomprehensible to human mind, but comprehensible to a more evolv...
So things like traveling from a universe to another or even create universes, understand the infinite and live forever are simply ''a dog bark'' for a...
Ok, let me give you an example: if you traveled back in time and met Ceaser your smartphone and explained to him that this tool is based on electricit...
No, I mean evolution (technological or natural) will make something that our current brains could not comprehend. For example, they would invent scien...
- Screaming is a reflex and it is totally related to calling for help. I could agree it could have other functions as well, like scaring the animal or...
The desire of human being to have his door/gate opened without the effort of the owner is OLD AS HECK!!! Come on dude, really? Of course King Richard ...
No man, it isn't. When I was a kid I have a sexual desire for a girl in my class in the form of erection, but I had no idea what sex was and how it wa...
I didn't say people would imagine the shape of the technology (eg. a box containing apps), I said that in the end, the cellphone is nothing more than ...
Now I totally disagree! Not only your statement does not follow a logical path, but there's an abundance of evidence that ideas as communicate with ot...
Well, that is a good point. I agree on the torture part, but the part with nature is a bit more complicated in my view. Probably immortality will be a...
I don't see it that way. The cell-phone was just a step ahead towards pre-existing goal: to communicate with others from distance wherever you are. No...
- Agree, but I was talking about the evolution of technology, not the technology itself. What you say about the environment and culture is perfectly t...
I do find your answer challenging. I have thought about this many times. But what makes something to become irreversible? It's like having infinite po...
Comments