You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

softwhere

['Confirm Email']Joined: December 07, 2019 at 20:51Last active: December 18, 2019 at 10:23None discussions111 comments

Bio

Heidegger
Hegel
Husserl
Hume
Hobbes
Feuerbach
Derrida
Debord
Marx
Wittgenstein
Nietzsche
Kojeve

Comments

If by workable you mean conformity to your private intuition of the continuum, then actual mathematicians have famously wrestled with this. https://pl...
December 18, 2019 at 07:07
I'm trying to tell you that maybe you shouldn't take this old view for granted. Apply this to 'knowledge.' We learn how to use it as children. We don'...
December 18, 2019 at 06:37
Hegel and Feuerbach came earlier. Feuerbach is largely remembered as the bridge between Hegel and Marx, but I think he's underrated. Wittgenstein and ...
December 18, 2019 at 02:29
Well put. And, for what it's worth, I think that philosophy makes and has made progress. 'Know thyself' can be understood as directed at the 'global' ...
December 18, 2019 at 02:20
Yes, this makes sense to me. At the same time, I think symbols are necessary for conceptual sophistication. I'm guessing that some primitive unformali...
December 17, 2019 at 23:43
I think this forum is great for discussing our readings away from this forum, but I don't at all think that online debate is a substitute for that rea...
December 17, 2019 at 23:41
Perhaps there's a clue, found in a previous post. To me the 'realm of meaning' which includes noetic objects like 7 is related to the 'ideality of the...
December 17, 2019 at 10:06
I added to original post above.
December 17, 2019 at 09:41
I found this. https://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/03/books/all-language-was-foreign.html Fascinating! Thanks. A human being without language would seem to...
December 17, 2019 at 09:26
I agree. To be more blunt, strong cases have been made (later Wittgenstein, for instance) against thinking that knowledge is something definite like a...
December 17, 2019 at 09:23
Even a rough sketch might help me locate what you're getting at. I do think that there's no clean separation of word from deed. Much of our language u...
December 17, 2019 at 09:08
I've had a love-hate relationship with Heidegger for years. I'd write him off and yet be pulled back. For me a decisive moment was reading translators...
December 17, 2019 at 08:56
That's what I love about philosophy. It goes for the biggest picture and also the deepest picture. I agree, and some of my favorite philosophers are f...
December 17, 2019 at 08:06
.
December 17, 2019 at 05:13
Sure. Understood. I'll just reply a couple of points you made. Respond when you have time. I happen to have lots of free time lately. Right. So there'...
December 17, 2019 at 04:03
I highly recommend A Thing of This World by Lee Braver. It weaves Heidegger into narrative that stretches from Kant to Derrida. I read it for free as ...
December 17, 2019 at 03:37
The important thing to grasp is that math doesn't ultimately work with mere intuitions of what a point 'really' is. Such intuitions can guide the cons...
December 17, 2019 at 00:52
Nicely put. These are also themes I'm interested in. Mystique and Nothingness would be the kind of philosophy I like. Great project. I think the trans...
December 17, 2019 at 00:40
Well I can try to explain what I find valuable. But I don't read German. For me studying Heidegger further illuminated Hegel and Feuerbach and Wittgen...
December 17, 2019 at 00:31
I bumped into Eckhart in Caputo's book on Heidegger. Also Angelus Silesius. I think this is what Hegel wanted to rationalize. Also this: This reminds ...
December 16, 2019 at 23:29
I like the poem. It reminds me of Whitman, and I love Whitman. That's how I tend to view it. There is no enduring escape, but moments of insight and e...
December 16, 2019 at 23:24
I tend to agree, I guess. I think theology should be rational or just confess itself as poetry. I enjoy this input. I know the ecstasy of music and ra...
December 16, 2019 at 22:51
At this point I withdraw from our conversation.
December 16, 2019 at 22:47
I figured you'd know Feuerbach. 'All must pass through the fiery brook.'
December 16, 2019 at 22:22
I completely agree. I just emphasized (by exaggerating, let's say) the historicality and sociality of human existence. In this context, nature was bei...
December 16, 2019 at 22:19
Perhaps. But 'history is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake.' People learn by talking as well as reading. That people on this forum vary in t...
December 16, 2019 at 09:53
I got into Hegel via Kojeve, translated by Allan Bloom. I thought the English prose was great, and it was Hegel from an atheistic point of view, influ...
December 16, 2019 at 09:44
I might use different words, but this roughly gets the joy of reading and writing right. A person should of course exercise and eat well, but beyond t...
December 16, 2019 at 09:16
OK, thanks. I've mostly read the continentals, though I had a long Rorty phase. I'm glad you joined the forum. Your posts have been illuminating.
December 16, 2019 at 09:01
I think I understand this, and I think that's why various philosophers have more or less identified God with all of reality. To ensure that God remain...
December 16, 2019 at 08:58
Food for thought. It's one of the annoying things about specialization. Who has time to keep up with it all? And scientists have to eat too. I have no...
December 16, 2019 at 08:46
I like this, but skills is perhaps better than beliefs, in that 'beliefs' casts the whole thing as more explicit than I think it is. Have you looked i...
December 16, 2019 at 08:41
Good answer. And that's because the divine predicates are familiar human virtues. Who made who? We created God in our own image, unconsciously, automa...
December 16, 2019 at 08:34
But it's still good! It's like Husserl blended with Hegel and Heidegger. It's strange though that even a PhD in math is still suspicious when he gets ...
December 16, 2019 at 08:31
While I understand where you are coming from, I also think the evolving idea of g/G has been and remains important. Why this monotheism? Why this God ...
December 16, 2019 at 08:05
How can one violate the laws of nature? I think you're framing nature Nature as another god.
December 16, 2019 at 07:45
That naturalism Naturalism (our demonic protagonist) would find homosexuality 'unnatural' is...absurd. Homosexuality has probably always been with us....
December 16, 2019 at 07:44
I would just switch from information to interpretation. This is an active process. Metaphorically speaking, we are readers, readers, readers making se...
December 16, 2019 at 07:16
I relate, if I understand you correctly. I love phenomenology. I fear that some will categorize it as mysticism, while the mystical-religious types mi...
December 16, 2019 at 07:06
I think this connects to one's conception of philosophy. Should it be poetic and/or 'spiritual'? Personally I think that it must be. We care about the...
December 16, 2019 at 04:45
Excellent post! Not that 'we' always do a good job, but I think the ideal is that we protect young people from their own impulsiveness.
December 16, 2019 at 04:38
I think I know where he's coming from. When I first read Kojeve on Hegel, I was filled with intellectual ecstasy. I understand him to be sharing a bea...
December 16, 2019 at 04:32
I understand where you are going. But how sensible is this time before time? I find it as questionable as intuitions of actual infinity. Personally I ...
December 16, 2019 at 04:24
At some point I think this leads us into the philosophy of language. How do the signs 'actual infinity' function in our community? Is there ever some ...
December 16, 2019 at 04:18
This is a beautiful post. Thank you.
December 16, 2019 at 04:14
An interesting position. But what of great music, great art, great poetry? While I like the idea of silent monasteries, I'd also like an entire cultur...
December 16, 2019 at 04:12
Logophilic/logiphilic philosophers should perhaps consider how language itself and human rationality have properties traditionally associated with the...
December 16, 2019 at 04:08
For practical reasons. We abstract from the totality because it's instrumentally valuable. When I just need a chair for a guest, I don't need to under...
December 16, 2019 at 03:56
I really enjoy our friendly and sincere conversation. Thanks for being a charitable conversationalist.
December 16, 2019 at 02:38
We probably agree that secular culture is largely dominated by selfishness and materialism. I'd say look to leftist thinking (at its best) for the hum...
December 16, 2019 at 02:37