You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

The Great Whatever

Comments

He looks both white and black to me. It shows in his accent and mannerisms as well. He can affect both white and black English, and he affects either ...
November 12, 2016 at 04:26
"people of color" stopped watching lol
November 12, 2016 at 04:09
Obama as a black president is a media creation, and I'm skeptical about that as a litmus test because the media can claim whatever it wants with virtu...
November 12, 2016 at 03:57
One, I think it's just counterfactual that anyone abides by a 95-5 rule. Two, I agree that there's a notion of white as the absence of ethnicity rathe...
November 12, 2016 at 03:28
The problem is, the only way to make the conversation interesting is to equivocate: if you emphasize that it's a social identity, then you can't actua...
November 11, 2016 at 14:20
Marchesk, again, you're confusing the application of words as social construct with that they denote as social construct, which is a use-mention error...
November 11, 2016 at 14:16
Again, this doesn't strike me as interesting. The confusion of what words are used for what things, and what those things are, is a pedestrian one.
November 11, 2016 at 05:03
Seems the same to me. The use-mention distinction is a first test of decent philosophy, IMO, and failure to grasp it is the start of a lot of bad thin...
November 11, 2016 at 04:44
Which chunk of land you consider a continent is arbitrary. But the continents themselves are obviously not. You could have considered Europe three con...
November 11, 2016 at 04:40
Shame is an important motivating force in the world today. I think it's a (post-)Christian thing.
November 11, 2016 at 04:31
Yes, the European continent is objectively real. Hahahahaah
November 11, 2016 at 04:30
I thought I already showed you why that was nonsense? Or where was the train of thought? I agree except I think that we are in a post-enlightenment ep...
November 11, 2016 at 03:51
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize that was all that counted. Are you white btw?
November 11, 2016 at 03:45
So were white people. Or did you not know that or something?
November 11, 2016 at 03:37
I think they never began or ended. It's because of vanity that white people focus on their own exploits -- being the best at being evil gives them som...
November 11, 2016 at 03:34
No, it wouldn't be. The idea of being dark would be the same. People would just think different things about dark people.
November 11, 2016 at 03:32
In such a world, there would be light and dark skin, and black and white people, as much as there are in this world. See how that works?
November 11, 2016 at 03:30
I think ethnicities exist, and are traceable to where your ancestors came from. I think they're not a social construction, that white people are an et...
November 11, 2016 at 03:28
White people are utterly delusional about race, and all minorities know this and exploit them for it, so their opinions don't matter on the subject. A...
November 11, 2016 at 03:23
Which is not the same thing as saying that whiteness is a social construct or was invented to justify colonialism and slavery.
November 11, 2016 at 03:21
Well, considering I am an American minority...maybe I should ask myself?
November 11, 2016 at 03:17
So people thought that those of European ancestry were superior to those who weren't. OK, how does that mean that being of European ancestry was inven...
November 11, 2016 at 03:15
I understand Marchesk's position but am being deliberately obtuse because sometimes that's what it takes to show that a position's dumb. I mean, I wen...
November 11, 2016 at 03:10
How could it have been a social construct? If there was nothing to latch onto, it wouldn't have worked, because you literally wouldn't have been able ...
November 11, 2016 at 03:09
In what way can one express racial superiority/inferiority, if there is no race to be inferior or superior to?
November 11, 2016 at 03:04
And what is the reason?
November 11, 2016 at 03:01
Yes it does. It may also be that being of European descent puts you in a historically privileged class. That does not mean that this is the meaning of...
November 11, 2016 at 02:58
It doesn't matter. Maybe neither. Using the vagueness of categories or exceptions of categories is not grounds for the dismissal of a category – again...
November 11, 2016 at 02:51
I mean that "black" and "of sub-Saharan African descent" are roughly synonymous, at least as I understand the words in my idiolect.
November 11, 2016 at 02:49
In the case of ethnic identity? Clearly not. No amount of expression will make it so that your ancestors originated from somewhere other than from whe...
November 11, 2016 at 02:48
OK, but people from sub-saharan Africa are black. So what you say makes no sense. They wouldn't be considered inferior or enslaved, but that wouldn't ...
November 11, 2016 at 02:41
OK, but having European heritage is just having ancestors that lived in Europe. So what you're saying makes no sense.
November 11, 2016 at 02:40
If it weren't for the slave trade, there would still be black people, obviously. Why would you say something so clearly false?
November 11, 2016 at 02:37
Not at all. Who belongs to a group depends on the qualities of the person and the qualities composing the group. We can change labels for groups, and ...
November 11, 2016 at 02:36
So being white is being of European descent. But being white was invented to justify colonization and slavery. It therefore follows that being of Euro...
November 11, 2016 at 02:35
Except I wasn't talking about colors, obviously, but categories of people metonymically named on the basis of those colors, so this is irrelevant.
November 11, 2016 at 02:27
No, it meant being European. Being European meant you got to dominate, yes. But you're committing a fallacy. Notice that no one not from Europe become...
November 11, 2016 at 02:24
They would be "white?" Well, they would be black ex hypothesi, as you just said. We could use the word "white" to mean what we now mean by "black," su...
November 11, 2016 at 02:23
What does this even mean? Does it mean that we talk about them? Okay, yes we do. But that is a weird way of saying that. Does it mean that ethnicity i...
November 11, 2016 at 02:12
OK, but 'white' means roughly 'of European descent.' To be of European descent is not a social construct, nor is it somehow equivalent to evil ethical...
November 11, 2016 at 02:10
...Yes, the Portguguese and Ukranians are genetically related, not as closely as the Spanish and Portuguese, and more closely to each other than the P...
November 11, 2016 at 02:01
OK, I legitimately can't tell. Are you serious?
November 11, 2016 at 01:55
Yes, there were many groups, which were more closely related to their neighbors than those farther away. This correlates with physical traits, the mos...
November 11, 2016 at 01:52
So you're denying that people who descended from European ancestors are part of a group? What do you mean by 'racial group,' and how does that differ ...
November 11, 2016 at 01:43
Marchesk, please tell me where you begin to disagree: 1) There are different groups of people who originated in different parts of the world. 2) These...
November 11, 2016 at 01:42
What exactly do you think is absurd? That there are ethnic groups? I seriously don't know what you're trying to say here, nor how protesting that clas...
November 11, 2016 at 01:38
Not at all. Identity politics is a driving force in modern Western politics, and is being exported to the rest of the world.
November 10, 2016 at 22:41
Not quite. It views white people as without identity. Although the moderate right does evoke the 'colorblind' position.
November 10, 2016 at 21:58
No, it stems from the fact that people come from different places and look different ways based on where they come from. There would still be white, b...
November 10, 2016 at 21:55
Nah. The idea of being white is the idea of roughly being from Europe ancestrally. It's true that that ancestry has been used to justify slavery and c...
November 10, 2016 at 18:35