You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

fdrake

Comments

Another feature this highlights is that explanations need not tell the 'whole story', whereas reductive explanations, when right, must.
October 19, 2019 at 04:50
Yes! That's a good way of putting it I think.
October 19, 2019 at 04:48
I've gotten real fucking high a few times, and it has impacted how I think about things, but I would never believe that the intuitions and sensations ...
October 19, 2019 at 04:38
I'm glad you sorted this out. For a sketch of reductionism, my take on it anyway: I understand an explanation; of X by Y; as an asymmetric epistemic r...
October 19, 2019 at 04:30
I don't think capitalism ended?
October 19, 2019 at 03:55
I just wonder why you'd reject that homo sapiens (and our minds) are descended from our homo ancestors (and their minds), when you're so happy to acce...
October 19, 2019 at 03:27
The Concept of Enlightenment 21
October 19, 2019 at 01:30
You're speaking like the classification of humans as a hominid is an arbitrary one. As if the grouping of organisms into families is not evidence base...
October 19, 2019 at 01:05
You are not addressing it, yes, you are bracketing it as if it's irrelevant. I don't believe it is as you emphasise: an importance of non-reduction. W...
October 18, 2019 at 21:49
This is so lazy. I think you're speaking from a place of ignorance about how science studies humanity. I read a paper about traumatic stress yesterday...
October 18, 2019 at 13:23
Are you sure you're not over emphasising the role of sensate values by basing your worldview off of experiences of revelation? You seem fundamentally ...
October 17, 2019 at 11:58
But you do think they're over emphasised in our understanding of the true nature of reality? I do not. (1) A human mind requires its associated human ...
October 17, 2019 at 09:22
I can guess what you believe, but I don't think you'd ever publicly assent to any of it. (1) Reality is a collective idea, everything in it is an idea...
October 17, 2019 at 09:05
Actually yeah it does. Catholicism is an old religion with a storied history, it's worldwide, commonly accepted, has had professional theologians for ...
October 17, 2019 at 08:52
So, charitably, you argue in a way in which you do not seek to demonstrate the truth of your beliefs to others. You use the trappings of rational argu...
October 17, 2019 at 08:17
L. Ron Hubbard is a recognized luminary of Scientology, a profound expert on the practice of dianetics, and articulated a fully self consistent cosmol...
October 17, 2019 at 08:04
You can't become an expert; cognizable, articulable understanding; on that which cannot be understood; the mystical; affective, non-articulable unders...
October 17, 2019 at 07:49
Yes, but you have not reasoned. There aren't domain experts on that which cannot be understood.
October 17, 2019 at 07:38
It's hard to criticise because it's arational, when noncognitively derived frameworks impinge; as premises, framings, inferences; on cognitively const...
October 17, 2019 at 07:24
I think that's a very important thing to highlight. A philosopher's worldview has dual aspects: it operates as an association of perspectives and idea...
October 16, 2019 at 18:43
Theology's always rubbed me the wrong way. I think if you 'let god in' to your thinking it has disastrous effects. It isn't really the god that does i...
October 14, 2019 at 22:50
Actually no, not once in this thread have you ever asked what I thought a social construction is. I checked. There are no questions like "fdrake what ...
October 09, 2019 at 19:02
So just because I find this interesting. I take a naturalistic view on social construction. That might seem like a contradiction in terms, but it's qu...
October 08, 2019 at 17:56
In: Bannings  — view comment
Loyalty, familiarity and appreciation of their good points are the reasons S was treated with such leeway.
October 08, 2019 at 12:48
Wait. Waaait. You think a person's identity is just about what they think?
October 08, 2019 at 12:06
Oh I get it maybe, you think gender is about anatomical/natal sex, and not just influenced by it (as part of a complicated system of bodies and social...
October 08, 2019 at 11:32
In: Bannings  — view comment
There's a teething period. You'll find out who you find worthwhile to engage with and who you find worthwhile to read. In my view, we don't restrict d...
October 08, 2019 at 11:31
Ok! How do you think someone gets an identity? Or do they just 'have' it from when they're born? And how do you think someone becomes influenced by or...
October 07, 2019 at 11:47
Harry, I've never thought that sex is a social construct.
October 06, 2019 at 14:25
I'm glad. I was also half seriously apologising for the worst sin.
October 06, 2019 at 01:33
Forgive me for intentionally being an idiot.
October 06, 2019 at 01:30
How dare you assume yeast derivatives' identity is not persistent across cultures. But point taken.
October 06, 2019 at 01:08
You lot who hate tribal signalling and infighting sure do have the same talking points.
October 05, 2019 at 16:16
I'm standing right where I was.
October 05, 2019 at 14:42
Maybe if I moved to Australia and kept eating marmite, the magical Australia juices would fill me with their succour and I would come to love the thic...
October 05, 2019 at 14:39
People don't like the taste of marmite. Therefore no one can develop a taste for marmite.
October 05, 2019 at 14:38
Forget about intersex people and the other proposed gender identities for now. People with male natal sex never have female natal sex. People with fem...
October 05, 2019 at 14:28
/uploads/resized/files/oj/hjbfgfv48e6rseh1.png I made a thing for you.
October 05, 2019 at 14:10
Sex characteristics are associated with gender archetypes. Gender archetypes are associated with sex characteristics. Clearer?
October 05, 2019 at 13:56
Yeah I figured. I think it's obviously false. Though social-body interactions do obviously happen (passing/not passing and avoiding/having resultant f...
October 04, 2019 at 21:46
I think it's a pretty interesting philosophical issue though. There's certainly a subtext of 'so they're not really women/men! Aha!' from related disc...
October 04, 2019 at 21:31
Just gonna close the thread.
October 04, 2019 at 19:16
I'd do the same thing with accord, socially mediated feelings of accord with one's sex characteristics etc... But point taken. You really don't care h...
October 04, 2019 at 18:37
I think you're privileging gender over sex; specifically, I think you're making gender conceptually dependent upon sex illegitimately, whereas sex and...
October 04, 2019 at 16:51
Fair enough! Maybe anyway. Sensations associated with bearing = sensations associated with felt disaccord with one's sex characteristics which are not...
October 04, 2019 at 16:22
No. Sex is anatomical. Gender is social. Sex and gender correlate. The processes that give someone a gender are not the same as the ones that give the...
October 04, 2019 at 14:32
Just so you know, I'm very open to the possibility of your proposed structure of the feeling, but I don't think I can take any views/sensations of dis...
October 04, 2019 at 08:46
So, I hope you believe that I understand what you mean by bearing. I am trying to. I'm perfectly able to imagine that being trans or gender non-confor...
October 04, 2019 at 06:26