You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

NilsArnold

['Member']Joined: October 18, 2019 at 10:25Last active: October 21, 2019 at 15:121 discussions18 comments

Discussions (1)

Comments

yes, i know he made great progress with phenomenology but didn't get all the way, he concluded that at some level we construct our own intention but t...
October 18, 2019 at 15:21
what was your question, sorry
October 18, 2019 at 14:30
your a cheap date mate
October 18, 2019 at 14:01
because he works on the proof that we do not construct reality for ourselves which is my aim
October 18, 2019 at 13:57
sartre aims at the proof no good starting in the middle pal, you'll never get anywhere
October 18, 2019 at 13:56
intention or aim or desire, "progress" is the word used in the first sentence. By progress he must mean that there was some sort of aim that was being...
October 18, 2019 at 13:21
intention is key how to define it? is it simply the implication of any action or does it require a series of actions which all point in the same direc...
October 18, 2019 at 13:16
apparently that is not true
October 18, 2019 at 13:01
i would disagree with that, i think b+n is pure truth, it's called the phenomenological method and it describes existence here's something that defini...
October 18, 2019 at 12:58
i don't think so
October 18, 2019 at 12:54
very funny
October 18, 2019 at 12:54
not really
October 18, 2019 at 12:50
the problem of existence is addressed by Sartre in the introduction of Being and Nothingness what is it? it's a God-given feeling that comes from acti...
October 18, 2019 at 12:46
it's literally the hardest writing in the world to understand
October 18, 2019 at 12:43
it depends if you have a passion for truth or not
October 18, 2019 at 12:42
God is not an atheist
October 18, 2019 at 12:39
i think the approach is to understand that there is a guiding method being used which is the "phenomenological" method. It is a case of applying the m...
October 18, 2019 at 12:36
it's the ontological proof which is contained in the introduction, it seems that the rest of it is an expansion
October 18, 2019 at 11:13