You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Pfhorrest

Comments

The issue isn't that R2 supposedly contradicts R1. Nobody thinks it does, not even Popper. Popper's whole falsificationist program is saying that "con...
January 22, 2020 at 06:28
Correct so far. Not so correct according to a falsificationist like Popper. A claim being scientific has nothing to do with whether it is true or not:...
January 22, 2020 at 05:40
The pursuit of wisdom. Wisdom, in turn, does not merely mean some set of correct statements, but rather is the ability to discern the true from the fa...
January 22, 2020 at 01:17
:100: :party: We have a winner!
January 21, 2020 at 23:49
Can I color it both pink and invisible?
January 21, 2020 at 23:37
I think philosophy is much like martial arts for the mind: as the practice of martial arts both develops the body from the inside and prepares one to ...
January 21, 2020 at 23:17
Nobody is saying black things EQUAL ravens. Black things are a SUPERSET of ravens; at least, that's the claim in question. That claim might be false; ...
January 21, 2020 at 22:55
Take a look at this image: https://uploads.desmos.com/activitybuilder/722f70e4dfcd9e0c9e174fc45a22c1f4 Everything in B is in A. Everything that is not...
January 21, 2020 at 22:37
It does. We can symbolize "all ravens are black" as "R -> B". That's equivalent to "~(R ^ ~B)" or "~R v B" or "~B -> ~R", which we would say as "nothi...
January 21, 2020 at 22:06
It couldn't, which is the point. Confirmationism implies that it could, which is absurd, hence disproving confirmationism.
January 21, 2020 at 18:34
Nope, it's falsifiable by finding a non-animal that is a cat. "All cats are animals" = "if cat then animal" = "not (cat and non-animal)" To falsify it...
January 21, 2020 at 18:05
Hypothetico-deduction is confirmationist, not falsificationist.
January 21, 2020 at 18:01
I just added to the OP this for clarification of the intent behind this poll: The impetus behind this question is reflecting on how at different stage...
January 21, 2020 at 17:53
Is your username "A Seagull" because you're just here to shit on everything?
January 20, 2020 at 23:13
I think you understood my example backwards. This isn't about you or me arguing with a creationist. This is about what if you or I are like the creati...
January 20, 2020 at 23:12
That is my usual approach, which is what makes circumstances like this interestingly problematic to me: when I can’t follow the line of argument, but ...
January 20, 2020 at 21:05
Other way around: knowledge is a form of belief. Justified true belief, traditionally, but it's recently come into question whether that is enough. Bu...
January 20, 2020 at 18:34
This isn't meant to be passive-aggressive toward him, I don't have any problem with him personally, and it's not just about him. I genuinely thought t...
January 20, 2020 at 07:16
I find it interesting that this thread has been derailed into exactly one if the examples of this phenomenon I had in mind (math proving things about ...
January 20, 2020 at 05:53
Kant was using what contemporary philosophers would consider slightly ambiguous language. "Predicate" is a linguistic term, and existence is certainly...
January 20, 2020 at 03:31
First question lacks the reasonable answer: housing is ridiculous overpriced (due largely to rent-seeking activity on the part of the rich). Even aver...
January 20, 2020 at 02:44
Art is anything presented bu an artist to evoke a reaction in an audience. No qualities of the thing presented or the kind of reaction evoked or the c...
January 19, 2020 at 03:17
Are there true sentences involving colors as objects of them? If so, then colors exist.
January 18, 2020 at 23:56
Murder is a subset of killing, not an alternative.
January 18, 2020 at 23:09
I didn't create this thread to talk about one specific argument, but more about the general type of question that an argument that I've seen repeated ...
January 18, 2020 at 22:41
We can always just rephrase it as the Paradox of Gentle Killing and still have the same formal problem to sort out. It actually works out a little bet...
January 18, 2020 at 19:44
I don't really want to share a specific example because I don't want to cause drama calling out the main person I've encountered this phenomenon with....
January 18, 2020 at 19:42
I'll be voting Bernie in the Democratic primaries, but probably whoever wins the Green ticket in the general (living as I do in California; if you liv...
January 18, 2020 at 08:26
Now suppose that Russell, who you probably trust to be a lot better at you than math, claimed that he could mathematically prove, with math too comple...
January 18, 2020 at 05:37
I'm not sure what you're saying here. "Cisgender" is to "transgender" as "heterosexual" is to "homosexual". What's the problem? It can mean both: The ...
January 18, 2020 at 05:30
"Cis" is short for "cisgender", the opposite of "transgender". "Cis" and "trans" are generally Latin prefixes meaning "on the same side as" and "acros...
January 18, 2020 at 05:16
I intentionally picked two things that seem like a huge mismatch to me, because when I encounter this phenonemon in person the field of the premises a...
January 18, 2020 at 04:57
Looks good enough for me. :)
January 18, 2020 at 01:46
The logic as Forrester interprets it means that every murder that was ever done, ought to have been done. That seems like something has gone wrong in ...
January 18, 2020 at 01:45
I don't see why it would be a tautology. As to whether that could be a workable basis for a normative ethical theory, that would depend entirely on ho...
January 17, 2020 at 23:17
I think that last bit has some small errors in the explanation of ?A?B(?x(x?A?x?B)?A=B), and it might be clearer to switch the places of the biimplica...
January 17, 2020 at 23:04
In my philosophy I set out to do something very similar to this. I start out with rejecting two positions that I call fideism and nihilism, the latter...
January 17, 2020 at 22:53
Somehow I missed your post earlier. You make a good point about my formalization of "you murder gently" as a conjunction of "you murder" and "you are ...
January 17, 2020 at 22:36
Yeah, I mentioned that upthread, in my second post. That is correct. If you were in fact obliged to murder gently, then not murdering would be incompa...
January 17, 2020 at 22:22
Anarchy is all about public property. Anarchy is socialism without the state.
January 17, 2020 at 19:56
I think the problematic premise is 1, not 3. It is not the case that we ought to murder gently, for it is the case that we ought not murder at all, wh...
January 17, 2020 at 19:50
Dark matter and dark energy are posited because we see weird things happening in the universe and posit those names for the as-yet-unknown whatever it...
January 17, 2020 at 19:41
Yeah, that is a key rule, but I don't think that that is the source of the problem. It's true that if Smith ought to murder Jones gently, that Smith o...
January 17, 2020 at 18:51
You've got the first part right, but the second part backward. Science is applied philosophy, but philosophy is broader than religion. I would argue t...
January 17, 2020 at 18:27
In: Bannings  — view comment
I think Virgo was making fun of the grammar of that sentence, which is a little unusual.
January 17, 2020 at 17:17
Your point about the hidden premise that it’s obligatory to not murder was a key part of my OP.
January 17, 2020 at 17:12
Coincidentally I came across an old note to myself tonight about this very topic, and I think the conclusion I've now come to upon reading my old thou...
January 17, 2020 at 07:21
This exactly. When I see black people criticize each other for “acting white”, it looks like they’re being racially prejudiced against their own kind....
January 16, 2020 at 22:52
In: 4>3  — view comment
What you're describing there is a composite function with the y-value 4 from x-values 1 to 2, and y-value 3 from x-values 3 to 4. In that case it's tr...
January 16, 2020 at 10:01
In: 4>3  — view comment
Since the functions have non-overlapping domains, they are not simultaneous equations, and x can mean different things for each of them.
January 16, 2020 at 09:26