You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Bartricks

Comments

So moral values are not themselves valued.
September 19, 2019 at 20:44
Yes, to say that something is valuable, I think, is to say that it is featuring as the object of a valuing relation. So there's the valuer - who is th...
September 19, 2019 at 20:41
yes, the first premise does not express the conclusion. I am unclear what it could be for something to be valuable yet not be the object of a valuing ...
September 19, 2019 at 20:36
Well it is nice to have opinions. But yours are all false as my argument demonstrates, doesn't it!!
September 19, 2019 at 19:48
No, the argument is not circular if that's what you mean.
September 19, 2019 at 19:38
I am not watching any videos. Refute my argument and stop expressing your opinions - they count for nothing at all.
September 19, 2019 at 19:33
What would you have me call her?
September 19, 2019 at 19:31
No, not positing, concluding. See the argument for details.
September 19, 2019 at 19:30
Because: 1. Moral prescriptions are prescriptions of Reason 2. Moral prescriptions are the prescriptions of a subject 3. Therefore moral prescriptions...
September 19, 2019 at 19:29
A subject. The one described in conclusion 9 above. The one whose values constitute moral values; the one among whose prescriptions are moral prescrip...
September 19, 2019 at 19:26
What do you mean by an 'ontological context'? What am I not realizing?
September 19, 2019 at 19:21
ONce more, I stress that you and others blankly stating that something is false does not constitute counter-evidence. You're not gods - thank god - an...
September 19, 2019 at 19:20
Yes, that is my position and I think it is well supported. I keep telling you that I am a moral realist. I am unclear how you think you're making a 'c...
September 19, 2019 at 19:18
The argument is more interesting than me.
September 19, 2019 at 19:01
I don't understand the question
September 19, 2019 at 18:59
To be valuing something is to be adopting some kind of positive attitude towards it. So, when you say "ice cream is good' that is not a value, that is...
September 19, 2019 at 18:57
I am not sure I understand your question. None of our values - that is no valuing of ours, no valuing activity that we may be engaged in - are moral v...
September 19, 2019 at 17:22
I think you are an arrogant one, I really do. But to be honest i couldn't care less what you think of me - as should be obvious - and i am surprised y...
September 19, 2019 at 17:11
Ah, because I said that most moral philosophers agree that moral norms and values are categorical and you sought to refute me by, bizzarely, providing...
September 19, 2019 at 08:26
I am a moral realist, yes. That, I think, has never seriously been in doubt. Your point? For I said that most moral philosophers agree that moral norm...
September 19, 2019 at 08:20
I have to be honest, I was initially impressed by all those symbols and I thought I was done and dusted, for they were all Greek to me. And so I repli...
September 19, 2019 at 08:16
No, those aren't beliefs. You can call them beliefs, but that won't make them beliefs. Beliefs have to be believed. And only minds - subjects of exper...
September 19, 2019 at 06:49
I am not playing (you are, as ever, extremely bad at drawing conclusions). But as you are, I am not responding to you any more. And as you've given me...
September 19, 2019 at 03:32
Something is made morally valuable by her valuing it, for what it is for something to be valuable is for her to be valuing it. Crickey. She knows more...
September 19, 2019 at 03:28
Ah, sorry - that was a typo on my part. The first premise, using your ice cream example, would be this: 1. If my values are moral values, then if I va...
September 19, 2019 at 03:25
I have answered your question. A question I have answered numerous times before and that you could have read the argument and seen the answer to. Reas...
September 19, 2019 at 03:22
I have answered numerous times. Yes. You: what do you mean by 'yes'. Do you mean 'turnip'? Answer my fucking question!!!. Me: no, I mean 'yes'. You: I...
September 19, 2019 at 02:47
I don't know what you mean by an 'objective belief'. I am not following you. I have defined 'subjective' as meaning 'made of a subject's mental states...
September 19, 2019 at 02:40
No, I can't do that. Not sophisticated enough - sorry. If water and gold are one and the same, then if I have some gold I necessarily have some water,...
September 19, 2019 at 02:34
But you're not challenging anything I've argued.
September 19, 2019 at 02:04
I know more than you do about how value works. See my argument for details (although take a course in logic first or it won't make sense)
September 19, 2019 at 01:01
I think it is quite clear what I am arguing here - i am defending, indeed demonstrating, that subjectivism about moral values is true. How far the sub...
September 19, 2019 at 00:59
Buddy Rich.
September 19, 2019 at 00:32
i'm not. Dingo Jones is. I am cool as a cucumber. I just think most people couldn't care less where an argument leads if it leads to a view they don't...
September 19, 2019 at 00:31
are you seriously saying I haven't presented arguments? Blimey - do you even know what one is? I have presented arguments - good ones. Sound ones. The...
September 19, 2019 at 00:22
of course it matters. Nothing incoherent about my premises.
September 19, 2019 at 00:13
Some typos there due to my phone presumpively but wrongly predicting my words
September 19, 2019 at 00:12
I assume your working definition of a troll is 'someone I don't agree with or understand yet who argues in accordance with the canons of reason and wh...
September 19, 2019 at 00:10
well you're not coping well are you. Go write my name on a pillow or something and hit it a few times and then see if you can raise a reasonable objec...
September 19, 2019 at 00:04
yes, the subject - the one whose values are moral values - is an experiencer. A subject of experiences. Like me. Like you. And what - what - is your o...
September 19, 2019 at 00:01
Here's a quote from Bertrand Russell that I quite like - it's about why we shouldn't trust Xenephon's version of Socrates' Apology. "“A stupid man's r...
September 18, 2019 at 22:37
And don't start talking to me about the Euthyphro dialogue. You haven't read it, have you? I think I'm the only one here who actually has. What you've...
September 18, 2019 at 22:31
Okay for the umpteenth time - the subject is....wait for it......a subject. A subject of experiences. You know, what you are. What I am. Like, the mos...
September 18, 2019 at 22:30
No, you just don't know what you think you know. You can be a moral realist and deny the categoricity of moral norms and values. You can be a moral ni...
September 18, 2019 at 22:27
You're confusing the expression of a belief with the belief itself. If I write on a piece of paper that "I believe it is Sunday" I have not created a ...
September 18, 2019 at 21:35
Read my definition - the one operative here. Beliefs are subjective, becusae beliefs are mental states and mental states are states of a subject. Agai...
September 18, 2019 at 21:32
You haven't read Joyce. Or you read him in Albanian or something. Joyce believes that it is the mark of a moral imperative that it is categorical. Lik...
September 18, 2019 at 21:28
How on earth can you think that?? Missed completely. I mean, hurled the hammer through the window.
September 18, 2019 at 21:23
Er, no I haven't. The original argument refers to any of your valuings. If it works with any of your valuings, then it is also going to work with a su...
September 18, 2019 at 21:22
That's not the first premise. The first premise expresses the thesis of individual subjectivism. So, using your ice cream example, the first premise w...
September 18, 2019 at 21:21